|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 28, 2016 22:32:12 GMT -5
Demolition's record should NEVER be broken.
I know it's inevitable that New Day will break it but man that is so wrong on many levels. Just my opinion here but I think New Day's act is overrated and dumb as hell. We went from an awesome team like Demolition to the ''New Day''. That speaks volumes on todays garbage tag division.
I'm interested in what you guys think about it. I can't be the only old school fan that thinks this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Oct 28, 2016 22:34:43 GMT -5
I like the new day, so I'm ok with it
|
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Oct 28, 2016 22:51:35 GMT -5
Demolition is cool as hell. But it wouldn't bother me if their record was broken.
I like the New Day, they're a cool tag team. Kind of like the New Age Outlaws with how over they are and what they can do with a crowd and hoe they act (Enzo and Cass too). I see no problem in them beating Demolition.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Oct 28, 2016 23:06:31 GMT -5
Lol records are made to be broken dude. Didn't grow up with Demolition, not a fan of the stuff I've seen from them. Don't care if New Day breaks the record.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Oct 28, 2016 23:11:33 GMT -5
Doesnt really bother me, even though I love Demolition. Like its been said before, records cant be kept forever
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Oct 28, 2016 23:15:56 GMT -5
Demolition was alright.. but New Day is better. However, I'm bored as all  ing hell of New Day as champs. I wish they would've never lost to the PTP the first time, that way they'd have the record by now. I just want New Day to hit 500 days and then lose it immediately. The Club and Enzo and Cass are both over due for their own runs with the titles. I want New Day to have it, but I'm also so bored of it I wouldn't mind if they lose it at any point. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 28, 2016 23:20:03 GMT -5
I loved Demolition but I am okay with their streak coming to an end. That was in 1988 - 1989, almost 30 years ago! So its okay if a new team are the ones to end the streak.
However, I do feel if Bill Eadie and Barry Darsow weren't on that list to sue the WWE, that their streak of being the longest WWE Tag Champions would probably still be intact.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheLastDude on Oct 28, 2016 23:25:26 GMT -5
Doesnt really bother me, even though I love Demolition. Like its been said before, records cant be kept forever This. |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhawk on Oct 28, 2016 23:34:36 GMT -5
I'm alright with New Day breaking the record, they're actually the most over tag team I've seen in years but I also do agree they are starting to get stale and boring so once they break the record they should immediately lose the titles.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 28, 2016 23:39:13 GMT -5
Like its been said before, records cant be kept forever I don't see Bruno Sammartino's record ever being broken. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 28, 2016 23:46:45 GMT -5
Like its been said before, records cant be kept forever I don't see Bruno Sammartino's record ever being broken. That's a huge difference though! Bruno was champion when Jesus Christ himself was born, and held the WWWF Title for well over 1900 years at least. Okay, I am clearly over exaggerating but Bruno was champion for many, many years. The closest we had in the last 10 years was CM Punk's 14 month reign as WWE Champion. |
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Oct 28, 2016 23:48:12 GMT -5
Like its been said before, records cant be kept forever I don't see Bruno Sammartino's record ever being broken. Yeah but that's similar to old basketball records where the game was totally different. |
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 28, 2016 23:48:31 GMT -5
I don't see Bruno Sammartino's record ever being broken. That's a huge difference though! Bruno was champion when Jesus Christ himself was born, and held the WWWF Title for well over 1900 years at least. Okay, I am clearly over exaggerating but Bruno was champion for many, many years. The closest we had in the last 10 years was CM Punk's 14 month reign as WWE Champion. True but regardless it's a record that will never be broken. |
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Oct 28, 2016 23:57:45 GMT -5
Like its been said before, records cant be kept forever I don't see Bruno Sammartino's record ever being broken. You're comparing a title reign of 480 some days to a 7 year title reign. Yeah you're right, Brunos record could not be broken. Its not impossible to happen since i dont ever see Vince ever agreeing to booking someone as champion for 7 years, even if its Roman Reigns. |
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 29, 2016 0:03:07 GMT -5
I don't see Bruno Sammartino's record ever being broken. Yeah but that's similar to old basketball records where the game was totally different. I understand that but a record is a record no matter how the game is played. Bruno's record will stand the test of time |
|
|
|
Post by TheLastDude on Oct 29, 2016 0:03:45 GMT -5
That's a huge difference though! Bruno was champion when Jesus Christ himself was born, and held the WWWF Title for well over 1900 years at least. Okay, I am clearly over exaggerating but Bruno was champion for many, many years. The closest we had in the last 10 years was CM Punk's 14 month reign as WWE Champion. True but regardless it's a record that will never be broken. But that's a record that CAN'T ever be realistically broken in this day and age. Bruno's FIRST reign was 700 days longer than Hogan's SIX COMBINED reigns. Bruno 4,040 days over 2 reigns Hogan 2,185 days over 6 reigns Cena 1,240 days over 12 reigns See the downward slope there? Most other wrestling records can be broken. It's just a matter of finding the right guy that fans can get behind. |
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 29, 2016 0:08:16 GMT -5
True but regardless it's a record that will never be broken. But that's a record that CAN'T ever be realistically broken in this day and age. Bruno's FIRST reign was 700 days longer than Hogan's SIX COMBINED reigns. Bruno 4,040 days over 2 reigns Hogan 2,185 days over 6 reigns Cena 1,240 days over 12 reigns See the downward slope there? Most other wrestling records can be broken. It's just a matter of finding the right guy that fans can get behind. I agree but IMO New Day is terrible. I understand they're over and all but that's seriously the best team that got to break Demolition's streak? |
|
|
|
Post by TheLastDude on Oct 29, 2016 0:14:26 GMT -5
But that's a record that CAN'T ever be realistically broken in this day and age. Bruno's FIRST reign was 700 days longer than Hogan's SIX COMBINED reigns. Bruno 4,040 days over 2 reigns Hogan 2,185 days over 6 reigns Cena 1,240 days over 12 reigns See the downward slope there? Most other wrestling records can be broken. It's just a matter of finding the right guy that fans can get behind. I agree but IMO New Day is terrible. I understand they're over and all but that's seriously the best team that got to break Demolition's streak? But you have to remember, that's YOUR opinion. Like you said, look at how over the New Day is. Considering the tag division has been so horribly lacking for the last decade plus...then yeah, they really are the best bet. They're over in the way that Demolition and LOD were thirty years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 29, 2016 0:14:32 GMT -5
But that's a record that CAN'T ever be realistically broken in this day and age. Bruno's FIRST reign was 700 days longer than Hogan's SIX COMBINED reigns. Bruno 4,040 days over 2 reigns Hogan 2,185 days over 6 reigns Cena 1,240 days over 12 reigns See the downward slope there? Most other wrestling records can be broken. It's just a matter of finding the right guy that fans can get behind. I agree but IMO New Day is terrible. I understand they're over and all but that's seriously the best team that got to break Demolition's streak? Like I said earlier on in a post, I really don't think the WWE had any real intention of New Day breaking the streak, until Bill and Barry joined that law suit to go after the WWE. I am sure then Vince pretty much said, "screw them" and wanted to erase them from the history books. And what better way than to have their streak of being the longest WWE Tag Champions taken away. |
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 29, 2016 0:18:10 GMT -5
I agree but IMO New Day is terrible. I understand they're over and all but that's seriously the best team that got to break Demolition's streak? Considering the tag division has been so horribly lacking for the last decade plus...then yeah, they really are the best bet. Well if that's the case then that's pretty damn sad. |
|
