|
Post by johnnyb on Oct 4, 2014 1:58:30 GMT -5
I feel like this topic comes up every week, and every time I am compelled to say:
There is no comparison between Cena and Hogan. One man is the biggest star in history, who almost single-handedly put wrestling on the map, and the other one is a big fish in a tiny pond.
Cena's name being mentioned with other legends is a marketing tool and total wishful thinking on WWE's part. If Cena was really one of the all-time greats, wrestling wouldn't still be in the holding pattern it was in when they handed him the reins.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 15:37:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2014 7:17:03 GMT -5
I feel like this topic comes up every week, and every time I am compelled to say: There is no comparison between Cena and Hogan. One man is the biggest star in history, who almost single-handedly put wrestling on the map, and the other one is a big fish in a tiny pond.Cena's name being mentioned with other legends is a marketing tool and total wishful thinking on WWE's part. If Cena was really one of the all-time greats, wrestling wouldn't still be in the holding pattern it was in when they handed him the reins. well said Batfleck!!
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 4, 2014 8:28:54 GMT -5
I feel like this topic comes up every week, and every time I am compelled to say: There is no comparison between Cena and Hogan. One man is the biggest star in history, who almost single-handedly put wrestling on the map, and the other one is a big fish in a tiny pond.Cena's name being mentioned with other legends is a marketing tool and total wishful thinking on WWE's part. If Cena was really one of the all-time greats, wrestling wouldn't still be in the holding pattern it was in when they handed him the reins. You know, I may not agree with a lot of what you say, but that is spot on and the best way to describe it. I'm in no way a big fan of either guy, but that makes total sense.
|
|