|
Post by The-Rated-Welsh-Superstar on May 20, 2008 7:25:47 GMT -5
So on Raw Regal got fired.......so i was thinking what was the hole point of doing the king of the ring in the frist place?
I mean for one i loved regal as the GM and King it just brought somthing new to raw and now with him gone whats he going to do cos he cant still be the king on smackdown or ECW cos the angle wont work .
I just think wwe could of push this more but like so many things they have just craped all over it.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on May 20, 2008 8:35:54 GMT -5
it was going forward to being one of the best things on RAW regal was suspended for violating the drug policy thats the only reason he was "fired" he screwed it up for himself
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on May 20, 2008 8:44:41 GMT -5
Now, I bet WWE is kicking themselves in the ass for having Regal win the King of the Ring. They should've had Punk win instead. They would've been better off.
|
|
leafs911
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 18, 2007 22:56:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,004
|
Post by leafs911 on May 20, 2008 9:33:31 GMT -5
regal screwed regal
|
|
|
Post by hbk4champ on May 20, 2008 9:36:44 GMT -5
well it used to be when you won the king of the ring you got a wwe title shot but in 2006 booker t had to earn his shot in a battle royal and regal didn't even get a title shot.
|
|