hbklique1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 8, 2008 23:52:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,300
|
Post by hbklique1 on May 19, 2008 14:05:23 GMT -5
as long as hbk keeps having good matches and making others look good, he's probably not going to go anywhere
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on May 19, 2008 14:05:32 GMT -5
They are better than about 95% of the younger Wrestlers still
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on May 19, 2008 14:16:21 GMT -5
IMO Taker is the best he has ever been as far as in ring skills go, and HBK is almost as good as he was 10 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on May 19, 2008 14:34:52 GMT -5
Honestly, putting appearance aside, both still perform extremely well. I'd dare to say Undertaker is more agile and active in-ring now than he has ever been. HBK is still amazing in the ring too so I don't neccessarily agree with this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman (original) on May 19, 2008 15:31:04 GMT -5
Shawn Michaels is only 1 year older than HHH and Batista is older than both. The only reason he seems alot older is because he has been around since the mid 80's. I don't care if he is balding that doesn't take away from his in ring performace. He still puts on more 5 star matches a year than anyone else. He makes everyone he get's in the ring with better.
|
|
|
|
Post by PhoeniX™: Valoween on May 19, 2008 15:37:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on May 19, 2008 17:13:46 GMT -5
Who the  cares how they look? Do you care more about their look or how their performance in the ring is? Because Shawn Michaels and Undertaker are still the two best the WWE has. |
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on May 19, 2008 17:26:20 GMT -5
Undertaker tried that when he first returned in 2004, it was a disaster and I think it pissed alot of fans off. These two may not be at the top of their game, but they're still two of WWE's bigger draws. They need to be around as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumped on May 19, 2008 17:34:22 GMT -5
Undertaker has gotten better with age, and HBK can still put on one hell of a match. What's the problem?
|
|
Underfaker666
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 23, 2004 11:42:48 GMT -5
Posts: 3,540
|
Post by Underfaker666 on May 19, 2008 19:43:47 GMT -5
shawn should go for hair restoration. he can harvest hair from the back. taker could use a face lift  |
|
MX5
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 10, 2005 0:27:57 GMT -5
Posts: 4,520
|
Post by MX5 on May 19, 2008 19:48:05 GMT -5
Michaels has been balding for quite some time now.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on May 19, 2008 20:54:51 GMT -5
Who the cares how they look? Do you care more about their look or how their performance in the ring is? Because Shawn Michaels and Undertaker are still the two best the WWE has. Look is a lot of the wrestler's gimmick. So of course it matters what they look like. I'd much rather watch a charasmatic, fitting character than an old man with a young man's gimmick any day. |
|
|
|
Post by Slay on May 19, 2008 21:02:17 GMT -5
Last friday I thought Undertaker looked really good actually. (no homo)
|
|
|
|
Post by fallenhero on May 20, 2008 0:29:54 GMT -5
Undertaker has been getting better with age. Every PPV match he has been having are classics now. Yeah, Taker is pretty much at his peak when it comes to wrestling. HBK's still pretty ing awesome for being the balding boy toy, too. |
|
Master Lewpac
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Detroit plays dirty.
Joined on: Apr 12, 2007 1:47:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,890
|
Post by Master Lewpac on May 20, 2008 0:52:38 GMT -5
I dont know what you're watching... But they're better now then they ever were.
|
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on May 20, 2008 1:27:30 GMT -5
Shawn and Taker both will know when the times right to hang up the boots. The bad part is im pretty sure they will both leave at the same time.
but Taker has gotten really old compared to how he was in 03/04. he looks bad compared to just a few years ago, and idk if anyone else noticed, but he cant even to the Last Ride anymore. He tries but struggles on the easiest guys and cant do it anymore.
Shawn is still the best. he wrestles like hes 10 years younger like he is now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wrestlaholic on May 20, 2008 1:34:15 GMT -5
2006 Shawn looked fantastic in the ring, but i feel he isn't trying his hardest these days.. just my opinion. Undertaker on the other hand seems to have slowed down a lot, but then again i've seen so few Undertaker matches really.
|
|
Sandy
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 17, 2004 14:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 5,868
|
Post by Sandy on May 20, 2008 1:41:34 GMT -5
Would anyone look at HBK differently if he completely shaved his head? I wouldn't. I mean Kurt Angle had a similar hairline to HBK....he shaved his head and it looks fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on May 20, 2008 2:34:20 GMT -5
I'd love if they just had 1 last match at WM25, and leave it at that, I mean look at the stats;
Both in thier home state
20year anniversary for HBK
Biggest WM of all time
Classic match
|
|
|
|
Post by rickster627 on May 20, 2008 2:43:31 GMT -5
only catching up between the Two of them is their Balding Pretty Heavily!
if you happened to watch taker's match w/ edge you'll see his top is clear already.
As for Ring Wise nahh... they can give 3* +++ matches in my view
|
|
