|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Jul 31, 2007 13:48:13 GMT -5
You didn't need to lock it, not like there was hundreds of the threads. We should be able to discuss the matter.
|
|
Does that make me bad?
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
I AM A BAD TRADER WOO!!
Joined on: Jul 25, 2007 14:04:20 GMT -5
Posts: 2,143
|
Post by Does that make me bad? on Jul 31, 2007 13:50:41 GMT -5
i call this locked
|
|
|
|
Post by lytus on Jul 31, 2007 13:51:26 GMT -5
We were giving that dude a hard time about his job, but it was becoming more civil and settling down so I'm not sure why it was locked at the time it was.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Jul 31, 2007 13:52:09 GMT -5
Because this won't be locked or anything...  I think Shocker did the right thing in locking the other thread. Once it comes from a more reliable source and more information is known, he might unlock it. - Triple S |
|
|
|
Post by cjd15 on Jul 31, 2007 13:53:23 GMT -5
Agreed, I mean only one site reporting this? I find it hard to believe.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jul 31, 2007 13:54:42 GMT -5
1. There's a PM system. Use it if you need to talk to the Mods.
2. The whole story was speculation from a dirt sheet. WWE.com has no problem announcing when they're done with somebody, and they sure haven't said they're done with Jeff Hardy.
3. 90% of the posts weren't contributing anything useful, it was all "good riddance" and "omg he sucked neway."
If WWE announces that Jeff is done, then it's worth discussing. Until we have the whole story, all we have is speculations, guesstimates, and half-truths.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Jul 31, 2007 13:55:30 GMT -5
These things usually end up being true. Legit or not, one thread is no harm.
|
|
