|
|
Post by gin on Jul 30, 2007 23:44:33 GMT -5
I just noticed they keep raiding people that actually have talent onto RAW. Carlito, Kennedy, King Booker, Paul London, Brian Kendrick, Jillian , Super Crazy (CuriserWeight Wise), and William Regal. Look at all that talent their. They're being wasted in the Mid Card on RAW. Carlito or Kennedy as World Champion could have easily made smackdown watchable. But no they wanted to make them mid carders on Raw. With extremely bad storylines.
|
|
BigT
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 20, 2004 23:10:09 GMT -5
Posts: 3,491
|
Post by BigT on Jul 30, 2007 23:47:27 GMT -5
Because RAW is there flagship show and want all of the main talent there, bar a few to keep the others watchable
|
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Jul 31, 2007 4:31:23 GMT -5
And it's since then that Raw has become pretty good. Or at least very improved.
|
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Jul 31, 2007 5:53:58 GMT -5
To try and boost ratings was the last I heard.
|
|
|
|
Post by cjd15 on Jul 31, 2007 6:03:02 GMT -5
because WWE wants smackdown dead. think about it, theyve done everything they can to make ratings suck, and well its working.
|
|
eso
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 22, 2007 4:44:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,175
|
Post by eso on Jul 31, 2007 6:25:40 GMT -5
because smackdown sucks..
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Jul 31, 2007 8:56:54 GMT -5
Because they dont give a $#!+ about Smackdown. Kurt Angle one said that the WWE spends 5 days planning Raw and one day planning Smackdown.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Jul 31, 2007 9:03:59 GMT -5
As the others stated, Smackdown always has been, and always will be a B show. It's an after thought. Honestly, I wish they would drop it and ECW and stop pretending.
|
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Jul 31, 2007 9:49:55 GMT -5
I'm just amazed at what they are doing with London and Kendrick...which is nothing. After that great run on SD they arent doing anything but singles matches on Raw.
|
|
|
|
Post by vertan on Jul 31, 2007 9:59:48 GMT -5
Being on RAW is way better than being on Smackdown.
RAW is the flagship show, which gets you better exposure as a wrestler. More fans will now know who people like London & Kendrick, Jillian, and Kennedy are.
Plus, it gets stale having the same people every week on shows. Besides that, Smackdown is helpless. RAW or ECW always trades some good stars to them. They've gotten:
Chavo Guerrero (from RAW)
Edge (from RAW)
Gregory Helms (from RAW)
Kane (from RAW)
Kenny Dykstra (from RAW)
Matt Hardy (from RAW)
Ric Flair (from RAW)
Undertaker (from RAW)
Victoria (from RAW)
Chris Masters (from RAW)
Hardcore Holly (from ECW)
JBL (from RAW)
....those are all fantastic wrestlers.
And yes, while RAW may have taken many of the top stars...Smackdown has gained many from RAW and ECW to keep it strong. It's fair, I don't see the problem.
- Vertan
|
|
|
|
Post by timebombversion420 on Jul 31, 2007 10:38:31 GMT -5
I find it stupid they put london an kendrick on raw an now you hardly ever see them on raw ..atleast on smackdown you could see them almost every week...If your a CW if leave you on the show where the CW Title is ..such as Super Crazy & Divari , Booker & Carlito should also been left on Smackdown an if they wanted to put Regal as a Co-GM couldnt they have done that with Teddy Long since thats what there doing with Vicki ..I mean atleast Regal has done it before and hes alot more convinecing ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 31, 2007 11:06:53 GMT -5
Apart from Londrick - all those are better suited to RAW... That, and the fact that if they'd stayed on Smackdown, they were in danger of being eaten by Vickie Guerrero - (sorry - but this Gin seems to be obsessed with Vickie, so I thought I'd humour him, just once)...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 16, 2024 5:41:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2007 11:13:57 GMT -5
Smackdown has Vickie Guerrero. I'm sorry but Vickie>RAW.
|
|
