|
Post by megawarlord on Feb 2, 2008 2:33:22 GMT -5
Me as a personal level no I would never get a micro chip implanted in me.This takes away from your freedom way more then people think.Also many "Christians" believe it might be the mark of the beast.I don't believe it will be but maybe a preview of the one to come before it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 12:29:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2008 2:54:21 GMT -5
Hell no, I am not an animal. Implanting a chip for security is just going way overboard.
|
|
|
Post by megawarlord on Feb 2, 2008 3:53:17 GMT -5
over 35,000 people in Mexico already have these chips inside of them.
|
|
|
Post by onionmaster on Feb 2, 2008 4:36:42 GMT -5
over 35,000 people in Mexico already have these chips inside of them. Yes, but Mexico is a really ed up place. I would not ever do a such thing.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Feb 2, 2008 5:15:22 GMT -5
Definately not. Freedom is better than being traced simple as that. I dont need someone to know every single thing im doing.
|
|
|
Post by Gore on Feb 2, 2008 9:01:24 GMT -5
over 35,000 people in Mexico already have these chips inside of them. If that were true, you'd think they'd be keeping better track of those who are living illegally in our country.
|
|
|
Post by [MJH] on Feb 2, 2008 9:05:17 GMT -5
I don't like the idea of being moitored by the government, so I wouldn't get a chip.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 2, 2008 9:24:31 GMT -5
Not like they can't track you anyway. Between RFIDs in passports, and probably driver's licenses soon enough, not to mention cell phones.
|
|
|
Post by The Sam Kinnison Corps on Feb 2, 2008 9:48:45 GMT -5
Not like they can't track you anyway. Between RFIDs in passports, and probably driver's licenses soon enough, not to mention cell phones. Right. But if I decide to become a hermit and live in Yellowstone for the rest of my life, I don't want the government to know about it.
|
|
|
Post by GreatJunta36 on Feb 2, 2008 10:08:40 GMT -5
I don't even like RFID chips being in passports. I'm completely opposed to them. Sure it's easier to just "read" my information as I walk by but the security risks are astronomical and completely not worth it to me personally. I'd rather wait in line at an airport and talk to a person than rely on a machine to just pick up my data. "Convenience" is Big Brother's mask
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on Feb 2, 2008 10:46:22 GMT -5
No Way.
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Feb 2, 2008 15:53:08 GMT -5
I could care the less. You want to know my every movement? Go ahead, I'm all over the grid anyways. Between a consistent IP address, a cell phone, a telephone, mail delivery, my job and my bank transactions, it's not exactly impossible to figure out what I'm doing or where I'll be going next. It's not like I'm some sort of weapons baron or pedophile. And if I get murdered and all they find is my headless torso rotting in a field in Kentucky, I'd sort of like my family to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's me. You can fool yourself all you want, but no matter where you go, freedom is just a catch phrase for the ability to work, live, and believe in whatever you want. Having the government know that you were at your girlfriends house last night isn't infringing on those freedoms.
|
|
Austin McLane
Superstar
Beer City by way of Flavor Country
Joined on: Jul 13, 2005 21:18:02 GMT -5
Posts: 811
|
Post by Austin McLane on Feb 3, 2008 16:02:30 GMT -5
Hell no and anyone who would is a ING DUMBASS! I dont even like being tracked by the cameras that moniter your eery move in big citys, much less having a Tom Tom in your head.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 3, 2008 16:15:35 GMT -5
Whats the benefit?
|
|
|
Post by uzerx on Feb 3, 2008 22:09:55 GMT -5
over 35,000 people in Mexico already have these chips inside of them. You mean 35,000 people in America then....
|
|
|
Post by Blazer034 on Feb 3, 2008 22:47:39 GMT -5
I would never implant anything inside of me!!
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Feb 4, 2008 11:31:39 GMT -5
There's no way I would do that.
|
|