|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 22, 2024 0:24:56 GMT -5
More Rumble stuff during Rumble season... Does anyone else agree? I'd say it's as bad as 95,96,99,2022,2015,2012 etc... just bad stuff overall. It should have been Daniel Bryan winning or at least have Batista throw em out in the final two... they didn't even let him compete in the match ffs. I'd even say CM Punk deserved to win it. I know we all dislike smarky / Mark crowds but I cant blame em for hijacking the show... what a lame Rumble. Why do you need an individual thread for every Rumble. You're crowding the page and it is getting a bit redundant. You could easily make one thread regarding the best & worst rumbles, or, at a minimum, make one thread about the best rumbles and a second thread about the worst rumbles. Enough already. People seem to enjoy it anyway. Was only gonna do about 2 more. Down in the classics they make way more with no complaints.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 22, 2024 0:44:35 GMT -5
2009 was great tbh. I've rarely heard anyone say it was bad. I didn't like how they had Legacy in there with Orton for half the match/all the way up to the end. I get that was the whole point of Legacy storyline wise but it ruins the fun/chaoitc every man for himself element of the Royal Rumble for me. I felt the same about when they did it with Punk/New Nexus another year but that didn't last for the whole match. What made that Royal Rumble great in your opinion? Maybe I'm forgetting about something cool that happened. Off hand, I only remember the Santino fast elimination thing and a little face off moment between Kane and Undertaker. I'd say it was good, not as good as others, but it's not as bad as others for sure. I thought it had great action, great entrants, star power, good commentary, hot crowd etc. Orton winning his first Rumble, HHHs last Rumble til 2016, Takers last Rumble til 2017, Kane eliminating Dolph/Santino, RVD return, etc.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,508
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jan 22, 2024 20:59:41 GMT -5
Why do you need an individual thread for every Rumble. You're crowding the page and it is getting a bit redundant. You could easily make one thread regarding the best & worst rumbles, or, at a minimum, make one thread about the best rumbles and a second thread about the worst rumbles. Enough already. People seem to enjoy it anyway. Was only gonna do about 2 more. Down in the classics they make way more with no complaints. That's where these should go anyways. The classic board. Not here. Not 17 separate threads about the same match/ event.
|
|
|
Post by TKO Propagandist on Jan 23, 2024 3:24:08 GMT -5
More Rumble stuff during Rumble season... Does anyone else agree? I'd say it's as bad as 95,96,99,2022,2015,2012 etc... just bad stuff overall. It should have been Daniel Bryan winning or at least have Batista throw em out in the final two... they didn't even let him compete in the match ffs. I'd even say CM Punk deserved to win it. I know we all dislike smarky / Mark crowds but I cant blame em for hijacking the show... what a lame Rumble. Why do you need an individual thread for every Rumble. You're crowding the page and it is getting a bit redundant. You could easily make one thread regarding the best & worst rumbles, or, at a minimum, make one thread about the best rumbles and a second thread about the worst rumbles. Enough already. Don't make an issue out of something meaningless
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 23, 2024 4:31:05 GMT -5
People seem to enjoy it anyway. Was only gonna do about 2 more. Down in the classics they make way more with no complaints. That's where these should go anyways. The classic board. Not here. Not 17 separate threads about the same match/ event. Lol 17 separate threads??? I only did 3.....
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 23, 2024 4:31:21 GMT -5
Why do you need an individual thread for every Rumble. You're crowding the page and it is getting a bit redundant. You could easily make one thread regarding the best & worst rumbles, or, at a minimum, make one thread about the best rumbles and a second thread about the worst rumbles. Enough already. Don't make an issue out of something meaningless That's what I'm saying lol
|
|
|
Post by βππ£π ππ ππππ on Jan 23, 2024 10:08:35 GMT -5
2014 isn't even in the worst five Rumbles of all time. The match really isn't bad until #30 hit and it wasn't Bryan. The match itself is fun but the ending was miserable. I think that with hindsight, it all makes that match more forgettable than bad, since Bryan ultimately still had his moment at WM30.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 23, 2024 18:03:53 GMT -5
2014 isn't even in the worst five Rumbles of all time. The match really isn't bad until #30 hit and it wasn't Bryan. The match itself is fun but the ending was miserable. I think that with hindsight, it all makes that match more forgettable than bad, since Bryan ultimately still had his moment at WM30. It all worked out in the end
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,508
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jan 23, 2024 19:32:09 GMT -5
That's where these should go anyways. The classic board. Not here. Not 17 separate threads about the same match/ event. Lol 17 separate threads??? I only did 3..... You're kidding right? You did WAY more than three. You have a separate thread for 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2018, and 2020. It may not be 17, but it's definitely way more than three and certainly excessive.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,508
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jan 23, 2024 19:33:07 GMT -5
Why do you need an individual thread for every Rumble. You're crowding the page and it is getting a bit redundant. You could easily make one thread regarding the best & worst rumbles, or, at a minimum, make one thread about the best rumbles and a second thread about the worst rumbles. Enough already. Don't make an issue out of something meaningless We really need 12 (yes, 12) separate threads within a month about the same match? And on the wrong board nonetheless...
|
|
|
Post by TKO Propagandist on Jan 24, 2024 3:57:40 GMT -5
Don't make an issue out of something meaningless We really need 12 (yes, 12) separate threads within a month about the same match? And on the wrong board nonetheless... You're the only one that has complained/likely will complain. So keep yelling.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 24, 2024 5:13:26 GMT -5
Lol 17 separate threads??? I only did 3..... You're kidding right? You did WAY more than three. You have a separate thread for 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2018, and 2020. It may not be 17, but it's definitely way more than three and certainly excessive. 3 for the WWE board, the other 14 are on the classics... plus they hit the 2nd or 3rd page by now, only 2/3 threads are on the 1st page of the classics. Nobody else complains so it's all good.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 24, 2024 5:14:06 GMT -5
We really need 12 (yes, 12) separate threads within a month about the same match? And on the wrong board nonetheless... You're the only one that has complained/likely will complain. So keep yelling. Yep, everyone else is cool with it.
|
|
|
Post by βππ£π ππ ππππ on Jan 24, 2024 9:18:11 GMT -5
Lol 17 separate threads??? I only did 3..... You're kidding right? You did WAY more than three. You have a separate thread for 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2018, and 2020. It may not be 17, but it's definitely way more than three and certainly excessive. Stop the crying. Send a message to a moderator with your concern and they'll take a look at it and see if its violating any rules. Its not a problem and you're making it one. This sub can use all the activity it can get. Its a ghost town most of the time outside of major news stories and 4 PPVs a year. It has probably less than half the engagement it had just a few years ago. Let this dude and everyone else have their fun.
|
|
|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on Jan 24, 2024 10:29:16 GMT -5
I remember thinking the whole PPV sucked whilst watching it but I really disliked the product between 2013-2016, basically during the whole Authority stuff. The only things I remember enjoying during that time was Dolphβs cash in, Cenaβs US title reign, AJ Styles and NXT off the top of my head.
|
|
switchbladeera
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 22, 2023 19:31:26 GMT -5
Posts: 368
Member is Online
|
Post by switchbladeera on Jan 24, 2024 10:37:42 GMT -5
Man if 2014 counts as classic I feel like a dinosaur π¦.
That said, '95 still gets my vote for worst ever. Under 40 minutes and like 2/3 of the entries were terrible.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 24, 2024 14:56:45 GMT -5
You're kidding right? You did WAY more than three. You have a separate thread for 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2018, and 2020. It may not be 17, but it's definitely way more than three and certainly excessive. Stop the crying. Send a message to a moderator with your concern and they'll take a look at it and see if its violating any rules. Its not a problem and you're making it one. This sub can use all the activity it can get. Its a ghost town most of the time outside of major news stories and 4 PPVs a year. It has probably less than half the engagement it had just a few years ago. Let this dude and everyone else have their fun. Big facts
|
|
|
Post by J-MANN: Tag Team Champion on Jan 24, 2024 15:33:40 GMT -5
You're kidding right? You did WAY more than three. You have a separate thread for 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2018, and 2020. It may not be 17, but it's definitely way more than three and certainly excessive. Stop the crying. Send a message to a moderator with your concern and they'll take a look at it and see if its violating any rules.Β Its not a problem and you're making it one. This sub can use all the activity it can get. Its a ghost town most of the time outside of major news stories and 4 PPVs a year. It has probably less than half the engagement it had just a few years ago. Let this dude and everyone else have their fun. Exactly, outside a handful of members trying to keep things active here, this place is basically dead.
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 24, 2024 15:35:28 GMT -5
Stop the crying. Send a message to a moderator with your concern and they'll take a look at it and see if its violating any rules. Its not a problem and you're making it one. This sub can use all the activity it can get. Its a ghost town most of the time outside of major news stories and 4 PPVs a year. It has probably less than half the engagement it had just a few years ago. Let this dude and everyone else have their fun. Exactly, outside a handful of members trying to keep things active here, this place is basically dead. Tbh it's making a good comeback
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jan 24, 2024 15:35:59 GMT -5
You're kidding right? You did WAY more than three. You have a separate thread for 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2018, and 2020. It may not be 17, but it's definitely way more than three and certainly excessive. Stop the crying. Send a message to a moderator with your concern and they'll take a look at it and see if its violating any rules. Its not a problem and you're making it one. This sub can use all the activity it can get. Its a ghost town most of the time outside of major news stories and 4 PPVs a year. It has probably less than half the engagement it had just a few years ago. Let this dude and everyone else have their fun. I feel like the board is getting better again
|
|