My "sleepers" for this year's fantasy season

[Kliquid]

Quarterbacks
1. Tony Romo, DAL
2. Matt Leinart, ARI
3. Alex Smith, SF
4. Jason Campbell, WAS
5. Jake Delhomme, CAR
6. Daunte Culpepper, FA

Running Backs
1. Cedric Benson, CHI
2. Kevin Jones, DET
3. Marion Barber III, DAL
4. DeAngelo Williams, CAR
5. Chris Henry, TEN
6. Mike Bell, DEN
7. Adrian Peterson, MIN
8. Jerious Norwood, ATL
9. Reuben Droughns, NYG

Wide Receivers
1. Darrell Jackson, SF
2. Reggie Brown, PHI
3. Kevin Curtis, PHI
4. Troy Williamson, MIN
5. D.J. Hackett, SEA
6. Michael Jenkins, ATL
7. Steve Smith, NYG
8. Dwayne Bowe, KC
9. Terrance Copper, NO
10. Brandon Jones, TEN

Tight Ends
1. Dallas Clark, IND
2. Visanthe Shaincoe, MIN
3. Marcedes Lewis, JAX
4. Jerramy Stevens, TB
5. Leonard Pope, ARI

[ThugSuperstar]

kliquid said:

3. Alex Smith, SF

1. Darrell Jackson, SF

<3

Good stuff, Kliquid. The only stuff I'm not so sure I'd agree with are Dallas Clark and Chris Henry. Chris Henry for obvious reasons, but Dallas Clark wound up doing horrible for me two years ago and then he went on to have a great year in 2006. He's a risk, but the fact that Peyton is his QB helps.

[Jean-Ralphio]

I dont agree with a lot of these, but who knows, thats why they are called sleepers.

[Kliquid]

ralpho316 said:

I dont agree with a lot of these, but who knows, thats why they are called sleepers.

I won't say that I'm a brilliant fantasy football mind, but I usually do pretty well for myself. Last year, some of my sleeper picks included:

- Marion Barber III
- Maurice Jones-Drew
- Frank Gore
- Reggie Brown
- Bernard Berrian
- Jon Kitna
- Andre Johnson


Then again, I also had Dominic Rhodes, Ahman Green, and Michael Clayton (TB); so maybe I don't know what the hell I'm talking about. LoL.

[Deleted]

kliquid said:

Quarterbacks

3. Alex Smith, SF

BUT HE SHOULD BE BUILDING OR PAINTING YOUR SHED OR WHATEVER YOU SAID HIS ROOKIE YEAR!!!!!!!!! LoL! fred smoot!

[Kliquid]

po said:

kliquid said:

Quarterbacks

3. Alex Smith, SF

BUT HE SHOULD BE BUILDING OR PAINTING YOUR SHED OR WHATEVER YOU SAID HIS ROOKIE YEAR!!!!!!!!! LoL! fred smoot!

The guy has 27 INT's and 17 TD's in his first two seasons as a pro. Just because I have him as a 'sleeper' doesn't mean I think he's going to have an outstanding season - it just means that he's probably going to throw more touchdowns this year... Being a good fantasy football quarterback is WAY different than actually being a good NFL quarterback.

And Fred Smoot is a good player. Name me a single player who beat him for a touchdown other than Steve Smith.

... Case closed. Shut the up and go back to watching your 49ers, you tool.

[ET had AIDS]

i think you might be the only person in the world who thinks fred smoot is a good player. atleast your extreme and annoying michael vick bias is semi-acceptable, because there's a billion other people who play madden and go "OMFG MIKE VICK RUNS FAST" and latch onto his danglies too... but fred smoot? come the on. that's almost as bad as having a seneca wallace signature.

now go steal info from rotoworld.com, kffl, profootballtalk, etc. for your website, don't cite your sources, and spam the bringtheblitz.com link on every messageboard imaginable..

"tool"

[Kliquid]

hush said:

i think you might be the only person in the world who thinks fred smoot is a good player. atleast your extreme and annoying michael vick bias is semi-acceptable, because there's a billion other people who play madden and go "OMFG MIKE VICK RUNS FAST" and latch onto his danglies too... but fred smoot? come the on. that's almost as bad as having a seneca wallace signature.

Clearly the Seneca Wallace signature is a joke for, as you said, a "fast Madden quarterback."

If you'd actually WATCH HIM PLAY, you'd realize that he is a good player. The Vikings' defense was 32nd in the NFL last year because of a god-awful defensive scheme, not because Antoine Winfield, Fred Smoot, and Cedric Griffin couldn't cover the wide receivers. The Vikings are using aggressive, man-to-man corners as "zone" defenders and it just doesn't work.

There's a reason that people made a big deal about Smoot coming to Minnesota - because he was one of the best cover corners in the league.

hush said:

now go steal info from rotoworld.com, kffl, profootballtalk, etc. for your website, don't cite your sources, and spam the bringtheblitz.com link on every messageboard imaginable..

"tool"

Why you stick up for Po is absolutely in' baffling to me. He adds absolutely nothing intelligent to any topics and does nothing but spam.

And for the record, I do cite my sources -- and I have talked to ProFootballTalk about using their news and they are fine with it. I am working on an Associated Press license so I can use their news without the possibility of legal action.

But thanks for your opinion. Maybe you and Po can come up with a list of your own and we can compare them.

Oh wait, Po doesn't know crap about football outside of the 49ers.

[ET had AIDS]

LoL

[ET had AIDS]

for the record, i think he adds absolutely nothing intelligent to topics because this place is a ING JOKE and he doesn't want bother getting into debates with you about how fred smoot is a great cover cornerback (maybe a good one 3 years ago, but he was awful and never adjusted in minnesota... he is not among one of the best cbs in a league, and if you think that, sorry), michael vick is the only way the falcons can win because he makes the team SO MUCH BETTER, and so on so forth.

and how would you know what po knows? because he sure as hell doesn't post here. Just because he doesn't have some website where he takes news and reposts it doesn't mean he doesn't understand football. Atleast he doesn't think Fred Smoot is a great cornerback. LoL.

[Kliquid]

hush said:

for the record, i think he adds absolutely nothing intelligent to topics because this place is a ING JOKE.

As are his football opinions. Thus, I give them zero merit whatsoever.

[ET had AIDS]

kliquid said:

hush said:

for the record, i think he adds absolutely nothing intelligent to topics because this place is a ING JOKE.

As are his football opinions. Thus, I give them zero merit whatsoever.

And so are yours 90% of the time. Mike Vick ftw! LoL. Fred Smoot rulz! LoL.

Emmitt Smith best RB of all time LoL.

[ET had AIDS]

I'm not even going to get any further into this, you can take shots at my friends you know nothing about all you want, but fact remains, you mark for fast players on Madden. That's all I need to know.

[Jean-Ralphio]

Michael Turner is a sleeper because LT is gonna be used as a receiver a lot this year because Norv Turner is a silly nilly.

[Kliquid]

hush said:

for the record, i think he adds absolutely nothing intelligent to topics because this place is a ING JOKE and he doesn't want bother getting into debates with you about how fred smoot is a great cover cornerback (maybe a good one 3 years ago, but he was awful and never adjusted in minnesota...

Smoot has most certainly dropped off, but that doesn't mean he can't be very good again. Minnesota is a bad situation for ANY cornerback right now, including Winfield, who would be otherwise consensusly considered one of the top-5 corners in the NFL.

hush said:

he is not among one of the best cbs in a league, and if you think that, sorry),

He sure isn't anymore... But then again, I assume Po is talking about 3 years ago when I was truly 100% on the Smoot bandwagon; given that he was talking about what I said about Alex Smith from that timeframe.

hush said:

michael vick is the only way the falcons can win because he makes the team SO MUCH BETTER, and so on so forth.

He does. Anyone who expects them to be better without Vick is absolutely out of their damn mind.

hush said:

and how would you know what po knows? because he sure as hell doesn't post here. Just because he doesn't have some website where he takes news and reposts it doesn't mean he doesn't understand football. Atleast he doesn't think Fred Smoot is a great cornerback. LoL.

I've seen him post on other forums. In fact, I've seen him post about me on other forums, which is just hilarious.

[Kliquid]

hush said:

And so are yours 90% of the time. Mike Vick ftw! LoL. Fred Smoot rulz! LoL.

Emmitt Smith best RB of all time LoL.

The all-time running back yardage AND touchdown leader isn't the best of all-time? Wow, if that's the worst football opinion I have; I'm in pretty good shape.

At least you could've brought up something like Po does every post where I jokingly said that Brandon Doman was an unbelievably good quarterback...

Or how about me saying that Maurice Jones-Drew was going to be a big-time sleeper in 2006?.... Oh wait - that happened...

[Kliquid]

ralpho316 said:

Michael Turner is a sleeper because LT is gonna be used as a receiver a lot this year because Norv Turner is a silly nilly.

Hahahaah. That could very well be true. I also really think it's a good idea for Tomlinson owners to grab Turner as a 'handcuff' late in the draft. I don't want to jinx him, but Tomlinson hasn't suffered any injuries that I can recall in his NFL career; and he's probably 'due' for one sometime soon.

[Kliquid]

hush said:

I'm not even going to get any further into this, you can take shots at my friends you know nothing about all you want, but fact remains, you mark for fast players on Madden. That's all I need to know.

He goes out of his way to take shots at ME and you ing know it. So please stop acting like he's some kind of angel.

I've had this Seneca Wallace signature for like a year now... And I've watched Seneca Wallace since he was at Iowa State. He's not that bad... In fact, he did pretty well last year, given the circumstances he had (no Alexander, broken down offensive line, etc.)

[Deleted]

kliquid said:

hush said:

I've seen him post on other forums. In fact, I've seen him post about me on other forums, which is just hilarious.

I REMEMBER THAT! One of your sidekicks posted one of his articles from your site and before I even said anything he got ripped to shreds because his mock draft was god awful. Good times.. bringtheblitz.com we bring it! LoL

[Deleted]

SMOOT SMACK! LoL