|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jun 14, 2010 20:28:02 GMT -5
It's an angle. Yes they REALLY have contracts, but angle-wise, they do not. I know that. What I was saying. Everyone was saying the Danielson release was a work. Even though it said he was released on WWE.com They were saying, there was no reason for them to believe kayfabe wise he didn't have a contract. Since according to them kayfabe wise all the NXT guys had contracts and were competeing to be the "break out" star. IDK how to explain what I'm trying to explain. It's in my head, but I can't really get into words. No, it makes sense. People were trying to justify that Danielson's release was a work by saying that they all had contracts, but Bret saying now that they didn't have contracts makes that claim false. |
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Jun 14, 2010 20:28:02 GMT -5
What? They should be elimination matches, not one pin fall wins the match. So they should rename the PPV "WWE Battle Royal"? WWE World War 3. |
|
|
|
Post by kahnspiricy on Jun 14, 2010 20:27:59 GMT -5
My guess on the whole NXT angle is that this 'firing' is just a way to hold off on the whole thing and bide their time until they can sign Bryan back. Just a guess. That could be the case, but it's hard to say because it's just the beginning of Raw. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jun 14, 2010 20:28:04 GMT -5
What? They should be elimination matches, not one pin fall wins the match. So they should rename the PPV "WWE Battle Royal"? They called WM 16's match a fatal 4 way, not a battle royal. |
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Jun 14, 2010 20:28:35 GMT -5
Phenomenal spot.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 14, 2010 20:28:36 GMT -5
My guess on the whole NXT angle is that this 'firing' is just a way to hold off on the whole thing and bide their time until they can sign Bryan back. Just a guess. Honestly, this is the most realistic guess out there. Kudos. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmypokemanz on Jun 14, 2010 20:28:36 GMT -5
The "lol Danielson is gone so we're dropping this angle" Rascals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 14, 2010 20:29:06 GMT -5
This is a good match.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jun 14, 2010 20:29:13 GMT -5
I want them all to get jumped.
I want NXT to intervene in every match tonight and disrupt every promo.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Jun 14, 2010 20:29:23 GMT -5
HAT RACK CRACK!
|
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Jun 14, 2010 20:29:28 GMT -5
Now I love a good tower of doom, but TNA has done enough of them for me to NEVER want to see it again. EVER.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 14, 2010 20:29:26 GMT -5
The "lol Danielson is gone so we're dropping this angle" Rascals. So far, that's exactly what it looks like. Maybe it's on hold though. At leased until they can get Danielson back. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmypokemanz on Jun 14, 2010 20:29:52 GMT -5
I would think eventually all the other wrestlers would get pissed off that R-Truth slaps everyone. Same goes for Christian.
|
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Jun 14, 2010 20:30:16 GMT -5
I know that. What I was saying. Everyone was saying the Danielson release was a work. Even though it said he was released on WWE.com They were saying, there was no reason for them to believe kayfabe wise he didn't have a contract. Since according to them kayfabe wise all the NXT guys had contracts and were competeing to be the "break out" star. IDK how to explain what I'm trying to explain. It's in my head, but I can't really get into words. No, it makes sense. People were trying to justify that Danielson's release was a work by saying that they all had contracts, but Bret saying now that they didn't have contracts makes that claim false. Exactly, that what I was trying to explain. Except I was just doing it in a much more confusing way. |
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jun 14, 2010 20:30:30 GMT -5
Come on Miz!
|
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jun 14, 2010 20:30:55 GMT -5
The "lol Danielson is gone so we're dropping this angle" Rascals. Lol, didn't you know the entire angle was set up for him? And now, without him, the other 7 guys serve NO purpose?!?! |
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jun 14, 2010 20:31:02 GMT -5
Looks like Ryder's mouth is bleeding.
|
|
|
|
Post by HardyHeft on Jun 14, 2010 20:31:14 GMT -5
COME ON ZACK!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Jun 14, 2010 20:31:19 GMT -5
That was a really cool neckbreaker. Almost a sitout stunner.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmypokemanz on Jun 14, 2010 20:31:34 GMT -5
Very innovative jawbreaker reversal thing by R-Truth
|
|
