|
|
Post by Nix Hex on Apr 1, 2010 22:44:21 GMT -5
Taker was amazing during this time period. Agreed..He was such a hardass..It was awesome. |
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Apr 2, 2010 13:49:49 GMT -5
can anyone tell me when this was?
|
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Apr 2, 2010 13:53:54 GMT -5
I think it was awesome, taker beat alot of people up and deserved it. My first Undertaker figure came with this belt, I thourght the Hardcore Hampion was a error by the company at the time until a few years later I noticed it didnt actually have the C  |
|
|
|
Post by Hammersmith Hardman on Apr 2, 2010 14:43:32 GMT -5
can anyone tell me when this was? He was Hardcore champion in 2001/2002. |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Apr 2, 2010 22:38:44 GMT -5
Im sure it was because they had nothing else for him to do before Mania
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:31:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2010 1:48:01 GMT -5
TWAS STUPID AS POOPY
|
|
The Best in the World
Main Eventer
Let's Go Canucks!
Joined on: Jul 15, 2009 22:11:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,088
|
Post by The Best in the World on Apr 8, 2010 21:01:05 GMT -5
It gave the belt some prestige. His Vengeance '01 match with Van Dam was great. Losing the title to Maven was good, as it pushed a new talent.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Apr 10, 2010 16:54:16 GMT -5
It was just ideal as a transitional phase for him and the whole company.
I genuinely wanted to see Maven become something more than he did, I thought he was brilliant.
|
|
