Sims
Main Eventer
It's kinda cool to be back on here after years away.
Joined on: Aug 21, 2006 17:58:49 GMT -5
Posts: 2,713
|
Post by Sims on Sept 5, 2008 23:51:14 GMT -5
Well do you. Why is it when a certain wrestler you don't like does something its terrible but when someone you like does it,its okay.
Examples
*Edge cashes in Money in the Bank=Genius
*Punk does it=hate
*Big Show,Cena,Kane,Undertaker,Batista all beat Khali or Umaga withing one or two matches=fair
*Triple H does it=burying(Same with the dog situation)
*Punk has been World Champ for 4 months=fine
*Triple H 5 or 6 months=boredom!(is two months really that much of a difference)
*Rey Mysterio isn't main event/WHC=too small
*6ft 220 Pound Jericho=Next World Champion
*Jeff Hardy does drugs=pot head and undeserving bastard!
*HBK does drugs(90's)=Future Hall of Famer(same with RVD from what I've heard)
*Jeff Hardy=all he ever did was jump off of ladders
*Edge=Former 4(?) time world champion(RVD as well former 1 time WWE champion)
*WWE never pushes any new talent
They get about 20 fresh faces crazy pushes and you people hate almost all of them.
*Punk=not WHC material
*The Kendrick=needs to be next WWE champion
(might be wrong on that one)
*Kofi Kingston=did nothing to win the IC title
*Santino's first and current run with the belt(he was like jobbing to Beth and D'lo and Mickie for about a month or two,no one seems to complain then)
There are probably more but those are the only ones I have. Besides that it just seems like a lot of people are just never satisfied on here. Its like you get what you want(Punk as Champion,Shelton as Champion,new talent almost every week,interesting feuds, and pushes for all your favorites)yet you still aren't happy. I don't understand.
|
|
|
|
Post by heartbreakkid2k3 on Sept 5, 2008 23:54:48 GMT -5
I admit I have double standards when it comes to the wrestlers I like. I'd mark out huge if The Brian Kendrick became WWE Champion. Would it be the best business decision? No. But I'd mark.
Also, it's called an opinion. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean it's wrong.
|
|
JSky20
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 30, 2006 10:15:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,025
|
Post by JSky20 on Sept 6, 2008 0:03:11 GMT -5
HEY! What do you mean... you people?
|
|
|
|
Post by brm on Sept 6, 2008 0:05:02 GMT -5
So are you saying that if we enjoy it if one wrestler wins the Heavyweight title, we are hypocrites if we don't enjoy every single title win for the rest of time?
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Sept 6, 2008 0:06:45 GMT -5
HEY! What do you mean... you people? what do you mean..... you people? |
|
radicalpunk
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 19, 2008 22:11:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,059
|
Post by radicalpunk on Sept 6, 2008 0:08:39 GMT -5
I think people are never satisfied because the WWE doesn't do what they want them to do, so they start hating.
|
|
JSky20
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 30, 2006 10:15:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,025
|
Post by JSky20 on Sept 6, 2008 0:09:17 GMT -5
HEY! What do you mean... you people? what do you mean..... you people? HUH?! |
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Sept 6, 2008 0:13:27 GMT -5
No, we have contradicting viewpoints.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 6, 2008 0:23:49 GMT -5
Double standards are fun to think about aren't they? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Sept 6, 2008 0:33:52 GMT -5
I admit I have double standards when it comes to the wrestlers I like. I'd mark out huge if The Brian Kendrick became WWE Champion. Would it be the best business decision? No. But I'd mark. Also, it's called an opinion. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean it's wrong. Your post says it all. If we all agreed on the same thing, there'd be no point of discussion. Even if my opinion is better than Sims'.  |
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Sept 6, 2008 0:44:39 GMT -5
what do you mean..... you people? HUH?! tropic thunder line... i agree with you most have double standards |
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Sept 6, 2008 0:51:48 GMT -5
A lot of those you have listed up there I wouldn't even call double standards, every wrestler is scrutinized differently.
|
|
JSky20
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 30, 2006 10:15:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,025
|
Post by JSky20 on Sept 6, 2008 2:08:35 GMT -5
tropic thunder line... i agree with you most have double standards Do you really think I didn't know that bub? |
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Sept 6, 2008 2:11:37 GMT -5
tropic thunder line... i agree with you most have double standards Do you really think I didn't know that bub? i don't.... i don't think he did |
|
JSky20
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 30, 2006 10:15:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,025
|
Post by JSky20 on Sept 6, 2008 2:14:04 GMT -5
I was quoting the movie to begin with, and me saying "HUH?!" was a continuation of the movie's dialogue
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 18, 2024 3:24:15 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 2:39:24 GMT -5
cmpunk as champ vs hhh as champ argument is insane because punk hasnt been champ 12 times....with his grip tighter than michael jackson's at disneyland
|
|
Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Sept 6, 2008 3:49:16 GMT -5
proud to be fickle  |
|
|
|
Post by mvpfan93 on Sept 6, 2008 4:02:47 GMT -5
CM Punk was a face while he done this. Edge wasn't.
Batista and Cena made Umaga look like a savage to stop, Triple H...didn't.
CM Punk has only had the world title TWICE, Triple H had it 12 times.
Edge does more ground wrestling than Jeff Hardy
RVD was only on pot whereas Jeff Hardy was on well..everything.
Brian Kendrick isnt WWEC material
Rey Mysterio AND Jericho desearve world titles. Don't care what anybody says.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Sept 6, 2008 4:08:24 GMT -5
*Edge cashes in Money in the Bank=Genius
*Punk does it=hate
Punk is face and it works for Edge because he's a heel and the tactics are underhanded.
*Big Show,Cena,Kane,Undertaker,Batista all beat Khali or Umaga withing one or two matches=fair
*Triple H does it=burying(Same with the dog situation)
Triple H beat him 4 or 5 times and even beat him once in his second match of the night. Where as Umaga had never lost too the same person so many times in a row without gaining an advantage.
*Punk has been World Champ for 4 months=fine
*Triple H 5 or 6 months=boredom!(is two months really that much of a difference)
Triple H has also held the belt 11 other times where as Punk hasn't been winning a lot and its his first reign.
*Rey Mysterio isn't main event/WHC=too small
*6ft 220 Pound Jericho=Next World Champion
I agree with you there. I think it has more too do with the way they booked mysterio Plus its a 20 lb and several inch difference it's like comparing Kane too Khali.
*Jeff Hardy does drugs=pot head and undeserving bastard!
*HBK does drugs(90's)=Future Hall of Famer(same with RVD from what I've heard)
HBK has reportedly been off them for quite awhile. Where as Jeff Hardy has been fired in the past for them and recently gotten suspended twice. Oh and by the way they call him a druggie because they hate him because he's a spot monkey.
*Jeff Hardy=all he ever did was jump off of ladders
*Edge=Former 4(?) time world champion(RVD as well former 1 time WWE champion)
Edge also has had several very good matches and can pull on just a great of a match without them or highflying where as Jeff is bassically a spot monkey.
*WWE never pushes any new talent
They get about 20 fresh faces crazy pushes and you people hate almost all of them.
I haven't noticed that but by that they mean guys who've never been world champion getting the title. Such as Shelton Benjamin.
*Punk=not WHC material
*The Kendrick=needs to be next WWE champion
(might be wrong on that one)
Punk due too being booked as a midcarder before cashing in losing several times. Yes people here mostly know its prearranged but they'll sometimes think a guy sucks or start too say he sucks if he loses several times and doesn't get put in great matches with him coming out on top. The Kendrick being world champion I don't think its the majority. Maybe in a year.
*Kofi Kingston=did nothing to win the IC title
*Santino's first and current run with the belt(he was like jobbing to Beth and D'lo and Mickie for about a month or two,no one seems to complain then)
Do you remember his first win? Everyone hated him too the point we wanted him off tv. Now Santino has been around nearly twice as long and has been pulling off great promos. Where as Kofi hadn't had many matches on Raw and wasn't even announced for the match when he won the title.
Also the reason why it seems like no one is ever happy here is because there is so many people not everyone can be satisfied. Plus when a guy doesn't get a push and then out of the blue he wins a title it angerss us over bookings.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 18, 2024 3:24:15 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 5:40:00 GMT -5
well is just peoples opinions......WWE is never going to please everybody.
I dislike HHH since he became boss of politics in WWE late 2001.no one wil tell me any different.just like people wont lecture me on Wrestlers I like
some one else said about the whole Khali/Cena/Batista HHH thing.......and they were right Cena,UT,Batista all sold like SOBs for Khali(he pinned Taker with one foot)HHH didnt.
and dont get me started on the whole HHH/Hardy thing from Armageddon last year.
|
|
