|
|
Post by brethitmanhartxx on Aug 11, 2008 23:50:14 GMT -5
So wait a minute adamle tells Kane that carrying a bag would be a bad influence on KIDs..... so why didnt he stop JBL when he had BEER in the middle of the ring telling CM Punk to drink....
Sorry if this sounds nit picky but its illogical.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 11, 2008 23:50:51 GMT -5
Because it only happened once. It's not like JBL is carrying the bottle every week.
|
|
|
|
Post by brethitmanhartxx on Aug 11, 2008 23:52:05 GMT -5
Oh please what does it matter? Beer is Beer period.
|
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Aug 11, 2008 23:53:37 GMT -5
Because Kane is supposed to be nuts and demianted (sp) I guess. Also you may wanna chill out on your posts, you have 4 already on page 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Aug 11, 2008 23:59:34 GMT -5
Because if you're over 21 you can drink legally. Did people think Punk was going to drink it? No, so no harm, no foul. JBL is portrayed as the bad guy, to kids the bad guy loves Jack Daniels, so would they by pro wrestling logic want JD? NO.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 12, 2008 0:08:09 GMT -5
Oh please what does it matter? Beer is Beer period. What does it matter? You are talking about the difference between one segment with Jack Daniels, which is not beer and a man shown on screen with a sack week in and week out. |
|
|
|
Post by Tim Tebow™ on Aug 12, 2008 0:18:02 GMT -5
FFS, stop making so many pointless topics.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Aug 12, 2008 0:19:50 GMT -5
Note: Beer, is beer.
Jack Daniels, is whiskey... not beer.
Just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
Post by ppk101 on Aug 12, 2008 0:40:49 GMT -5
It's  ing JD not beer man. |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Aug 12, 2008 0:45:06 GMT -5
So wait a minute adamle tells Kane that carrying a bag would be a bad influence on KIDs..... so why didnt he stop JBL when he had BEER in the middle of the ring telling CM Punk to drink.... Sorry if this sounds nit picky but its illogical.  This man weeps for you! |
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on Aug 12, 2008 0:48:19 GMT -5
The whole Kane thing was a let down. Everybody knows that Rey Mysterio is alive. He beat Santino Marella a few weeks ago...
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Aug 12, 2008 0:59:13 GMT -5
The whole Kane thing was a let down. Everybody knows that Rey Mysterio is alive. He beat Santino Marella a few weeks ago... He sure did...then what? Rey hasn't been heard of since. I call Col. Mustard in the kitchen with the lead pipe. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Aug 12, 2008 1:09:01 GMT -5
I thought they were sending an excellent message to kids.
Punk said, he never drank, he never did drugs, and he is the WWE World Heavyweight Champion!
Pretty much, drugs and alcohol are not necessary to be "cool" or successful.
|
|
robby.blade
Main Eventer
64 Refs
Joined on: Jan 16, 2007 13:52:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,382
|
Post by robby.blade on Aug 12, 2008 1:12:01 GMT -5
Oh please what does it matter? Beer is Beer period. Jack Daniels is whisky..... |
|
|
|
Post by brethitmanhartxx on Aug 12, 2008 1:22:03 GMT -5
alcohol same ****....
|
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Aug 12, 2008 1:26:30 GMT -5
Because the problem isn't the item, it's that Kane was all secretive and anti-social.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Aug 12, 2008 1:34:29 GMT -5
Adamle probably had no idea what JBL was doing. He did say let the the superstars do what they want intervene when necessary. Punk was able to stand up for himself against peer pressure so Adamle probably saw no reason to intervene.
other than that i think he may have just to get kane to give him the sack with out there being any problems.
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Aug 12, 2008 1:39:24 GMT -5
Sounds like you are really trying to just sh*t all over Raw for whatever purpose. Get over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by PhoeniX™: Valoween on Aug 12, 2008 5:34:00 GMT -5
Oh please what does it matter? Beer is Beer period. ...it was Jack Daniels. Bull crap. Maybe when you're old enough, you'll realize. |
|
TommyHyland46
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 19, 2006 13:43:37 GMT -5
Posts: 2,139
|
Post by TommyHyland46 on Aug 12, 2008 5:45:56 GMT -5
Sorry if this sounds nit picky but its illogical. You need to go back to philosophy class and learn your laws of logic because there's honestly no way this is "illogical". Nothing that involves "creativity" is necessarily true, so there's no logical deductions to follow |
|
