|
|
Post by patgod on Jul 7, 2008 11:24:09 GMT -5
which are better and why tv events or house shows
|
|
|
|
Post by Keyboard Cat on Jul 7, 2008 11:28:56 GMT -5
With house shows you get to see some new talent and possible meet a wrestler. But at TV shows, You get a chance to be on TV and scream like a deaf idiot.
Sooo. . . I pick both ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by khalicantwrestle on Jul 7, 2008 11:39:27 GMT -5
TV, because at a house show, the possibility of a title change is about 1000/1
|
|
|
|
Post by Gangrel-Brood on Jul 7, 2008 11:47:34 GMT -5
I prefer house shows, since pretty much anything can happen (penisplex, anyone?).
|
|
|
|
Post by edge1700 on Jul 7, 2008 11:47:40 GMT -5
TV, because at a house show, the possibility of a title change is about 1000/1 Yeah...but on TV the ods aren't much better. Unless a guy gets suspended and has the belt they usually always save the title changes for PPV's. The whole CM Punk thing last week was a rare exception cause they needed a world title belt for Raw. That's the only reason we saw it last week. |
|
|
|
Post by MondayRaw on Jul 7, 2008 11:50:00 GMT -5
Both have their own advantages and disavantages...
House Shows:
-More crowd interaction
-See up and coming wrestlers
-More wrestling
TV:
-Better Quality wrestling
-Fireworks and Flashy lights
-Some wrestlers don't do house shows
-Advancement of storylines
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Jul 7, 2008 12:12:24 GMT -5
Tapping, houseshow seem waste money. They only do it to test the crowd to see whatever if they like or dislike. And they not do storyline as well, also never bring the stuff to tapping show. So its tapping show
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jul 7, 2008 12:56:10 GMT -5
House Shows, by far. I've been to a couple TV tapings and I consider them to be among the worst shows I've been to. It's total hit or miss - you could get a great episode or you could get a mess, and with WWE's recent history, you're much more likely to get a dud.
With house shows, you're almost guaranteed some solid wrestling and some great opportunities to interact with the wrestlers, especially if you're on the floor.
I'll take a house show over a Raw or Smackdown any day of the week. Pay-Per-Views, however, are another story.
|
|
leila
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 17, 2008 11:41:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,279
|
Post by leila on Jul 7, 2008 13:43:07 GMT -5
house shows because you can be able to sneak into front row due to less fans. Also the wrestlers are more interactive and more matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Jul 7, 2008 13:45:28 GMT -5
It really depends.
TV shows advance storylines and title changes are possible, which are pluses, but especially on RAW, you get few matches and mostly they are very short.
House shows at REALLY small venues arent the best because you may only see one main event match and otherwise and bunch of jobbery bouts, BUT if you go to a house show at a big/famous arena, the card could be near PPV quality. I went to a house show at Izod last November and Batista and Edge wrestled in a no holds barred match and it went over a half hour and I think was honestly better than any match they'd had at any PPV within the last two years.
|
|
