Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 21:13:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 15:41:49 GMT -5
Make a list of the only wrestlers needed in the entire WWE if you agree
1. I was watching WM8 today and the entire WWE consisted of just three titles and one brand. That's what it should be like today. We don't need all these shows and titles anymore.
2. Release all the dead weight on the roster, be honest, we all know what wrestlers Vince and the fans enjoy to watch. The entire WWE should consist of only about 35 wrestlers when you really think about it.
3. I you're going to keep the WHC, change the design into a new WWE style belt. The old WCW look makes it look more like a second rate belt because it reminds you of WCW.
WWE Championship wrestlers:
1. Shawn Michaels
2. Undertaker
3. Triple H
4. Edge
5. CM Punk
6. Big Show
7. Shelton Benjamin
8. Randy Orton
9. Elijah Burke
10. Chris Jericho
Intercontinental Championship wrestlers:
11. Kane
12. Finlay
13. MVP
14. Matt Hardy
15. Henry
16. Kennedy
17. Umaga
18. Regal
Tag Teams:
19 & 20. Cryme Tyme
21 & 22. Edge Heads
23 & 24. Rhodes & Dibiase
25 & 26. London & Kendrick
Light Weight Division:
27. Rey Mysterio
28. Kofi Kingston
29. Jeff Hardy
30. John Morrison
31. Carlito
32. Nunzio
33. Steven Richards
34. Kenny
35. Noble
Eliminate:
Cena
Batista
Divas
Palumbo
Deuce & Domino
JBL
Holly
Haas
Duggan
Cade
Striker
BDV
Burchill
Highlanders
Santino
Super Crazy
Snitsky
Val Venis
Miz
DH Smith
Jesse & Festus
Funaki
Khali
Vladimir Koslov
All announcers Except for JR, King & Howard Finkel
The rest of the belts
And finally.......................................
Raw, SmackDown, and ECW!!!! We should just have one weekly shown simply called "WWE Live".
|
|
|
Post by ppk101 on Jul 5, 2008 15:54:32 GMT -5
I don't think eliminating most of the titles would help. Winning titles helps to elevate the wrestlers to a degree so the more titles the more wrestlers get the rub from having the title.
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles888 on Jul 5, 2008 16:05:59 GMT -5
Leave the World Heavyweight title alone ! It's the best looking title the WWE has in my opinion.
- Iron Heart
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Jul 5, 2008 16:19:19 GMT -5
I'm going to say what I always say and just accept the changes and you'll enjoy it much more. Separate brands give more people a chance to shine. If Raw and Smackdown! were still merged, you can sure as hell bet guys like Edge, CM Punk, and Jeff Hardy would still be struggling to make it to the main event. This gives them more of a chance to be seen and have main event feuds because WWE has so many main event players.
|
|
|
Post by The-Rock on Jul 5, 2008 16:23:44 GMT -5
I'm going to say what I always say and just accept the changes and you'll enjoy it much more. Separate brands give more people a chance to shine. If Raw and Smackdown! were still merged, you can sure as hell bet guys like Edge, CM Punk, and Jeff Hardy would still be struggling to make it to the main event. This gives them more of a chance to be seen and have main event feuds because WWE has so many main event players. exactly.
|
|
s☠e
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 10, 2007 16:49:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,184
|
Post by s☠e on Jul 5, 2008 16:26:03 GMT -5
Yeh, I don't mind having the 3 brands. I think if WWE just focused more on the titles, we would see a huge difference.
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Jul 5, 2008 16:55:16 GMT -5
Bring back ing attitude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by commish13 on Jul 5, 2008 17:59:21 GMT -5
OH MY GOD INGENIOUS!
YOU'RE THE FIRST PERSON WHO HAS EVER THOUGHT OF ANY OF THESE THINGS!
SOMEBODY GIVE THIS MAN A PRIZE!
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jul 5, 2008 18:01:04 GMT -5
2. Release all the dead weight on the roster, be honest, we all know what wrestlers Vince and the fans enjoy to watch. The entire WWE should consist of only about 35 wrestlers when you really think about it.Wow... just... wow.
|
|
COCK & BLAST
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 26, 2007 14:00:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,875
|
Post by COCK & BLAST on Jul 5, 2008 18:01:24 GMT -5
I don't really mind the brands as much anymore as I used to. I just want them to get rid of ECW. It shouldn't even be around.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 21:13:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 18:24:38 GMT -5
2. Release all the dead weight on the roster, be honest, we all know what wrestlers Vince and the fans enjoy to watch. The entire WWE should consist of only about 35 wrestlers when you really think about it.Wow... just... wow. What's wrong with less cluster?
|
|
|
Post by Keyboard Cat on Jul 5, 2008 18:32:22 GMT -5
You didn't post anything about Hornswoggle?
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jul 5, 2008 18:51:42 GMT -5
What's wrong with less cluster? Less cluster? Are you ing kidding me? With the amount of guys there are on the roster now, we still end up with stale feuds every now and then. The Royal Rumble would be practically pointless, because it'd just be 30 out of the 35 guys trying to see who's the best, despite the fact that they'd be guaranteed to have fought everyone at least five times throughout the year, unless you'd have the same matches for a month at a time. There would be no variety. What would happen if someone were to get injured? You're whole 35 guys only theory has more holes in it than a sponge.
|
|
|
Post by tommyglamm on Jul 5, 2008 18:52:48 GMT -5
eliminating Paul Burchill is the dumbest idea ever
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 21:13:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 19:07:23 GMT -5
A tag team division can't run with 4 tag teams in it.
You didn't think this over at all, did you?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 21:13:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 19:54:43 GMT -5
Why can't the tag division consist of four teams? Why couldnt be like the 80's and 90's when teams and singles wrestlers would have year long, heated, and meaningful feuds? It was all so simple back then, yet it was great. Think about it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 21:13:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 20:10:50 GMT -5
Why can't the tag division consist of four teams? Why couldnt be like the 80's and 90's when teams and singles wrestlers would have year long, heated, and meaningful feuds? It was all so simple back then, yet it was great. Think about it. Because kids now-a-days don't have the attention for a year long feud, unless it's two high caliber stars like Batista and The Undertaker. And even that had about a four or five month break in the middle of it.
|
|
|
Post by livewire on Jul 5, 2008 20:31:17 GMT -5
it was better in the 90's but that's when WCW and ECW were around.. the WWE now controls the entire landscape of main stage wrestling so they are competiting against themselves. I always hated the brand expansion but it's a must now.
|
|
D-Rock
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 10, 2007 21:36:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,947
|
Post by D-Rock on Jul 5, 2008 20:50:56 GMT -5
^ the only reason why there was a 4-5 month break, was because Taker was hurt...
|
|
D-Rock
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 10, 2007 21:36:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,947
|
Post by D-Rock on Jul 5, 2008 21:01:16 GMT -5
WWE Championship wrestlers:
1. Shawn Michaels
2. Undertaker
3. Triple H
4. Edge
5. CM Punk
6. Big Show
7. Shelton Benjamin
8. Randy Orton
9. Elijah Burke
10. Chris Jericho
11. John Cena
12. Batista
13. MVP Intercontinental Championship wrestlers:
14. Kane
15. Finlay
16. Matt Hardy
17. Mark Henry
18. Mr. Kennedy
19. Umaga
20. Cade
21. Vladimar Kozlof
Tag Teams:
22. & 23. Cryme Tyme
24. & 25. Edge Heads
26. & 27. Rhodes & Dibiase
28. & 29. London & Kendrick
30. & 31. Jesse & Festus
32. & 33. Miz and Morrison
Light Weight Division:
34. Rey Mysterio
35. Kofi Kingston
36. Jeff Hardy
37. Carlito
38. Nunzio
39. Steven Richards
40. Kenny Dykstra
41. Jamie Noble
42. Evan Bourne
Eliminate:
Divas
Palumbo
Deuce & Domino
JBL
Holly
Haas
Duggan
Striker
BDV
Burchill
Highlanders
Santino
Super Crazy
Snitsky
Val Venis
DH Smith
Funaki
Khali
William Regal
I narrowed mine down to 42 I think we NEED.
|
|