*Ricky Spanish*
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 16, 2008 23:44:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,093
|
Post by *Ricky Spanish* on May 11, 2008 14:35:42 GMT -5
Hell is the point of stripping taker of the title.Why can't he ever have a nice long title reign.
|
|
|
|
Post by JCF on May 11, 2008 14:36:56 GMT -5
Edge vs Taker- Judgement Day. World Title match. Expect him to win it back.
Nice sig ;D
|
|
Reddevilbigevil
Main Eventer
Smite This!!!
Joined on: Aug 7, 2003 20:49:10 GMT -5
Posts: 4,091
|
Post by Reddevilbigevil on May 11, 2008 14:42:05 GMT -5
It`s just to add munbers to his reigns such as Triple H when he won it from Otron and Orton won it back. They did that so when Trips did win the title it would be an even 12. Taker will be at 7 when he wins it back, since ric Flair retired, it seems the number of title reigns seems to be a new factor in WWE
|
|
Wago
Main Eventer
Prepare To Get Wagowned.
Joined on: Mar 29, 2006 9:11:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by Wago on May 11, 2008 14:59:23 GMT -5
Well be nice to see Taker with another title reign on his list, the guy deserves on last run while he can still deliver.
|
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on May 11, 2008 16:38:37 GMT -5
I guess its to make Taker have more reins..
|
|
The Highwayman
Main Eventer
JP Deadly
Joined on: Feb 10, 2006 16:19:10 GMT -5
Posts: 4,371
|
Post by The Highwayman on May 11, 2008 16:59:54 GMT -5
and to stretch out the edge/taker fued even longer, id imagine... maybe not though... but who other top stars do they have to compete for the title? batista? khali? boring...
|
|
|
|
Post by knightpryde on May 11, 2008 18:34:17 GMT -5
and to stretch out the edge/taker fued even longer, id imagine... maybe not though... but who other top stars do they have to compete for the title? batista? khali? boring... MVP...Matt Hardy, |
|
|
|
Post by chumped on May 11, 2008 18:36:14 GMT -5
and to stretch out the edge/taker fued even longer, id imagine... maybe not though... but who other top stars do they have to compete for the title? batista? khali? boring... MVP...Matt Hardy, They aren't top stars, as far as the main event goes. And probably never will be. |
|
chokeslamcena
Main Eventer
Anyone got the old SmackDown "minitron" graphics?
Joined on: Mar 22, 2008 12:36:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,840
|
Post by chokeslamcena on May 11, 2008 19:08:13 GMT -5
I doubt undertaker cares how many title reigns he has. He'll be remember for winning at mania. No one will care about his title reigns (unles she goes into the 20 area obviously)
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on May 11, 2008 22:33:43 GMT -5
I doubt undertaker cares how many title reigns he has. He'll be remember for winning at mania. No one will care about his title reigns (unles she goes into the 20 area obviously) True, Undertaker will always be remembered as never losing at Wrestlemania. |
|
D-Rock
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 10, 2007 21:36:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,947
|
Post by D-Rock on May 12, 2008 12:57:59 GMT -5
MVP is capable of main event material, he just hasent been given the chance yet
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on May 12, 2008 13:41:58 GMT -5
In all fairness, he did win the title with an illegal choke.
And I'm pretty sure the real reason he was stripped of the title was so he could lose the belt without losing credibility. Just like last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on May 12, 2008 13:54:13 GMT -5
I think the whole angle is pretty gay, to be honest. I'm not really dying to see another Edge v. Taker match. We've just seen two in a row, now it's time to move on. If Taker beats Edge again, it'll just be complete burial of Edge. Honestly, they need to get more guys involved in the title picture because it's been Edge, Undertaker and Batista pretty much since late 2006.
As someone else stated above, I say MVP should get up there, but I'm sure that's a pipe dream.
|
|
