|
|
Post by lazewski on May 8, 2008 21:56:06 GMT -5
What the WWE could do with the other WCW and ECW title belts?
ok on Raw and Smackdown we have the Original WWF/WWE Titles:
WWE Championship.
WWE Intercontanel Championship.
WWE Woman's Championship.
WWE Tag Team Championships.
And that's all.. Now I know, the Cruiserweight Title was from WCW, and so was the World Title and United States Title.
Then on ECW they have the ECW Championship...
But where did the Raw Tag Team titles come from? Were they from ECW? ( ECW Tag Team Titles? ).
Why doesnt WWE use the ECW/WCW T.V Titles?
ALSO!
Couldn't WWE bring back the Light Heavy Weight Title? or the Hardcore, European Title?
|
|
|
|
Post by mattoriginal on May 8, 2008 22:00:53 GMT -5
RAW Tag belts are the original WWF Tag Team Titles, and no I haven't wondered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slay on May 8, 2008 22:03:10 GMT -5
No, the US title, tag titles, and intercontinental titles are all worthless in this day and age.
|
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on May 8, 2008 22:04:16 GMT -5
WWE has too many belts as it is, 6 is probably the maximum for a company in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazewski on May 8, 2008 22:07:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on May 8, 2008 22:08:45 GMT -5
The SmackDown tag titles came way after the RAW ones, so yes. The RAW ones are the original titles.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazewski on May 8, 2008 22:10:24 GMT -5
The SmackDown tag titles came way after the RAW ones, so yes. The RAW ones are the original titles. That dont mean anything, The SD looks like the WWF ones.. So wouldnt that make them be the original.. Raw ones look nothing like anything to the WWF. |
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on May 8, 2008 22:11:06 GMT -5
Yes, the RAW ones are the original. They just changed the design. The WWE Tag Title history only goes back to 2002.
|
|
|
|
Post by mattoriginal on May 8, 2008 22:12:27 GMT -5
The SmackDown tag titles came way after the RAW ones, so yes. The RAW ones are the original titles. That dont mean anything, The SD looks like the WWF ones.. So wouldnt that make them be the original.. Raw ones look nothing like anything to the WWF. Um...you ignore history. Remember when the Unamerican's jumped to RAW when they had the 'Classic' Tag Belts and had them for about a month, until WWE had new belts made. |
|
|
|
Post by lazewski on May 8, 2008 22:13:34 GMT -5
Yes, the RAW ones are the original. They just changed the design. The WWE Tag Title history only goes back to 2002. Ohh yeah!! I forgot all about the history of the Tag team belts.. Srry, nvm. about those, your right |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on May 8, 2008 22:17:37 GMT -5
WWE should just sell the name rights to WCW to someone *CoughERICBISCHOFFcough* and just keep the video library and move away from that and go back to being strictly WWE with 1 world title, 1 mid card title, 1 tag team titles and 1 brand
|
|
|
|
Post by lazewski on May 8, 2008 22:20:49 GMT -5
WWE should just sell the name rights to WCW to someone *CoughERICBISCHOFFcough* and just keep the video library and move away from that and go back to being strictly WWE with 1 world title, 1 mid card title, 1 tag team titles and 1 brand That's all we need to sell to Eric Bischoff is something to do with WCW! He hated the WWF back in the day.. He don't deserve anything of WCW, But WWE maybe needs to bring back WCW after they buy TNA? We all know WWE will own TNA sometime... And if Vince Mcmahon buys TNA and then opens back up WCW and ECW fully like the old days and puts all the Original and current wrestlers wherever they wanna go and bring back the reffs and titles.. etc..etc Vince will make ALOT more money. |
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on May 8, 2008 22:24:40 GMT -5
WWE should just sell the name rights to WCW to someone *CoughERICBISCHOFFcough* and just keep the video library and move away from that and go back to being strictly WWE with 1 world title, 1 mid card title, 1 tag team titles and 1 brand That's all we need to sell to Eric Bischoff is something to do with WCW! He hated the WWF back in the day.. He don't deserve anything of WCW, But WWE maybe needs to bring back WCW after they buy TNA? We all know WWE will own TNA sometime... And if Vince Mcmahon buys TNA and then opens back up WCW and ECW fully like the old days and puts all the Original and current wrestlers wherever they wanna go and bring back the reffs and titles.. etc..etc Vince will make ALOT more money. That would be stupid, WCW is dead and ECW should be aswell. Eric would have bought WCW if he had the TV Timeslot, but they didn't offer it to him so he declined, which is a shame because i would have liked him to own it and manage to get a TV deal and "re-create" WCW. |
|
|
|
Post by The-Rock on May 8, 2008 22:51:11 GMT -5
That dont mean anything, The SD looks like the WWF ones.. So wouldnt that make them be the original.. Raw ones look nothing like anything to the WWF. Um...you ignore history. Remember when the Unamerican's jumped to RAW when they had the 'Classic' Tag Belts and had them for about a month, until WWE had new belts made. false, as that was like storm/christian who had those belts (lost them to kane and hurricane). Y2J and Christian then beat kane/hurricaneand had the same old belts. Then I tihnk the dudleys beat them and debutred the new belts if i remember correctly. All i know for sure is by the time regal/storm/chief morley were champs they had the new belts |
|
