*Ricky Spanish*
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 16, 2008 23:44:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,093
|
Post by *Ricky Spanish* on Mar 22, 2008 4:38:02 GMT -5
IMO The Kane and undertaker storyline is the best story/feud ever done in wrestling. Yes Better than the nWo by far. From what I know Kane has never beat his older brother undertaker.So I feel when ever Big Evil feels it's time for him to leave at wrestlemania they need to have their 3rd and final showdown.The match should be a hell in the cell where Kane finally beats his brother but when he gets the 3 count the light go out and then taker is gone. /after this taker is never to be seen again other than a hof show if he makes it in one day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Mar 22, 2008 4:45:28 GMT -5
No, Kane shouldn't beat Taker at WM. No one should, that's Taker's thing, I really don't think he should ever lose at WM.
|
|
Wfigs #1 Metal-Head
Main Eventer
Machine F'kin Head!
Joined on: Mar 1, 2006 16:09:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,364
|
Post by Wfigs #1 Metal-Head on Mar 22, 2008 5:01:34 GMT -5
IMO The Kane and undertaker storyline is the best story/feud ever done in wrestling. Yes Better than the nWo by far. From what I know Kane has never beat his older brother undertaker.So I feel when ever Big Evil feels it's time for him to leave at wrestlemania they need to have their 3rd and final showdown.The match should be a hell in the cell where Kane finally beats his brother but when he gets the 3 count the light go out and then taker is gone. /after this taker is never to be seen again other than a hof show if he makes it in one day. Sounds like a good idea, but Undertaker should win. But the whole dissapearing thing would work well. The ONLY well Undertaker would come close to not winning would be a draw. |
|
Wfigs #1 Metal-Head
Main Eventer
Machine F'kin Head!
Joined on: Mar 1, 2006 16:09:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,364
|
Post by Wfigs #1 Metal-Head on Mar 22, 2008 5:01:57 GMT -5
IMO The Kane and undertaker storyline is the best story/feud ever done in wrestling. Yes Better than the nWo by far. From what I know Kane has never beat his older brother undertaker.So I feel when ever Big Evil feels it's time for him to leave at wrestlemania they need to have their 3rd and final showdown.The match should be a hell in the cell where Kane finally beats his brother but when he gets the 3 count the light go out and then taker is gone. /after this taker is never to be seen again other than a hof show if he makes it in one day. Sounds like a good idea, but Undertaker should win. But the whole dissapearing thing would work well. The ONLY way Undertaker would come close to not winning would be a draw. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 22, 2008 5:40:10 GMT -5
We've seen Taker/Kane a bajillion times and we've seen Taker/Kane at WM twice. What's the appeal of a third time?
|
|
|
|
Post by The L.F.C Fan on Mar 22, 2008 5:58:43 GMT -5
I believe now is the time for 'Takers streak to come to an end, IF Edge does defeat taker then thats all WWE need for Edge to become a full-time super-heel
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Mar 22, 2008 6:00:54 GMT -5
i'm in favor of Edge beating 'Taker at this year's WrestleMania. i just see no point continuing the streak because you'll get a genuine WM moment by ending it.
|
|
dtldiva
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 25, 2005 11:29:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,132
|
Post by dtldiva on Mar 22, 2008 8:24:00 GMT -5
I remember a while back I can't remember if the interview was with Undertaker or Kane, but that scenario was brought up and they were both against it, but in my opinion if anyone was gonna end the street I'd love it to be Undertaker.
As far as the streak goes, I've said this before and I've said this again....I dont' see Edge winning and I really want to see him lose and then we can get back to the Undertaker/Batista rivalry because that was the best one of last year and they in my opinion were the best matches!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Wrestlaholic on Mar 22, 2008 9:05:19 GMT -5
Undertaker is like 42 now.. by the time it is wm 29 i think.. he will retire, thats what i think will happen, he will go 20-0.
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Mar 22, 2008 9:07:24 GMT -5
Yeah, thats cool idea. I remember some website interview to Mark Collway (Undertaker, but not in gimmick/Kayfabe) and they asked him who do he want to lose to for his streak at Mania. Mark say he only want Glen Jacobs (Kane) defeated to him.
I would love to see Kane end undertaker streak then Kane buried alive Undertaker and never see undertaker again. (killed Undertaker, of course)
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 22, 2008 9:21:40 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind seeing Undertaker locking in his new submission on Edge. Edge possibly passing out in it, not tapping. The referee stops it more than likely declaring Undertaker the winner. New champion.
But Undertaker po'd about how much of an edge (pun intended) Edge had got on him, decides not to break the hold.
The referee reverses the decision therefor ending the streak, making Undertaker look undefeated, yet making Edge look like a scumbag in how he is still champion due to a referee reversing the decision.
|
|
|
|
Post by lancewiget on Mar 22, 2008 9:27:32 GMT -5
^^No^^
Just... no. Taker wouldnt let someone script stuff like that (although... what do i know?) and its unlikely that it would ever be the case. Taker will always be ??-0... and thats the way it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Mar 22, 2008 9:28:40 GMT -5
The streak shouldn't end....ever....never.....ever never ever never ever.
Taker should go up to 20-0 and then retire.
|
|
Reddevilbigevil
Main Eventer
Smite This!!!
Joined on: Aug 7, 2003 20:49:10 GMT -5
Posts: 4,091
|
Post by Reddevilbigevil on Mar 22, 2008 9:50:22 GMT -5
IMO The Kane and undertaker storyline is the best story/feud ever done in wrestling. Yes Better than the nWo by far. From what I know Kane has never beat his older brother undertaker.So I feel when ever Big Evil feels it's time for him to leave at wrestlemania they need to have their 3rd and final showdown.The match should be a hell in the cell where Kane finally beats his brother but when he gets the 3 count the light go out and then taker is gone. /after this taker is never to be seen again other than a hof show if he makes it in one day. Are you drunk?? Kane HAS beat Undertaker, IF he gets in the HOF? LOL That`s a good one!!  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 19, 2024 10:14:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2008 10:06:54 GMT -5
lol, seriously, what is the Internet's big obsession with Kane? Saying he deserves this and deserves that, the guy's a joke now. I try to like Kane, I really do, but he's so mind-numbingly boring these days compared to even a few years ago, it's not even funny. All of his matches are like you're watching in slow motion, the guy's been mailing it in for the longest time now, week after week he just plods along through the motions. Quite honestly, that's not somebody who deserves to "end the streak", and what would Kane have to gain from it anyway? He's like 40 years old, I'd be surprised if he's still here five years from now. Seriously, this unanimous IWC boner over Kane, making him out like some poor victim of underutilization baffles me, it really does.
*Insert generic comeback of "oh well, he's better than Cena" etc. here*
Anyway, now that my mini Kane rant is over, no, this isn't how it should end. If it does end, it should end eight days from now, and establish Edge once and for all as the uber-heel we all know he is. If it doesn't end next Sunday, meh, don't have it ended at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Mar 22, 2008 10:09:42 GMT -5
I have no problem with someone ending The Undertaker's streak, but I don't want it to be Kane at all.
If Kane were ever going to beat Taker, he would have done it years ago during the hight of his career. Kane has become nothing more than a mid-carder/novelty character in recent years. No one really takes himseriously anymore, beating Taker wouldn't make any sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by 49% Motherf**ker, 51% SOB on Mar 22, 2008 10:16:33 GMT -5
The streak won't end because the Undertaker's ego. I don't think he believes in putting people over, and that is obvious proof that the only way he loses most of his matches are from interference of some gimmick match so its not a clean win. Randy Orton should of ended it at WM 21. That lost hurt Orton's career more then it helped the Undertakers.
|
|
Reddevilbigevil
Main Eventer
Smite This!!!
Joined on: Aug 7, 2003 20:49:10 GMT -5
Posts: 4,091
|
Post by Reddevilbigevil on Mar 22, 2008 10:51:19 GMT -5
The streak won't end because the Undertaker's ego. I don't think he believes in putting people over, and that is obvious proof that the only way he loses most of his matches are from interference of some gimmick match so its not a clean win. Randy Orton should of ended it at WM 21. That lost hurt Orton's career more then it helped the Undertakers. Gimme a break! WAA WAA WAA. Thrashing hotels, pooping in peoples hand bags and getting suspended for drugs hurt Ortons career, and as for putting people over, I think you`ve mistaken him for Hulk Hogan! |
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Mar 22, 2008 11:04:53 GMT -5
Undertaker doesnt put people over? LOL
Taker's streak ending at the hands of Kane? LOL
Kane has already said he wants to stick around to put people over and that he's not in the business for titles. I'm pretty sure ending Undertaker's streak is in there along with that.
Taker's streak shouldnt end, though I wouldnt complain if Edge did it.
While we're at it, Kane shouldnt put the mask back on either. Backtracking in wrestling is always a terrible idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Mar 22, 2008 11:24:10 GMT -5
I don't ever want to see him lose. But if he were to lose to Edge, someone mentioned a disappearing thing. Anyway...if he were to lose, than it'd be  ing awsome if he did disappear for 11 months and at the 6-8 month mark Edge keeps making fun of how last year he finally got rid of The Undertaker. After No Way Out Things begin to happen starting up the fued again. Edge finally challenges The Undertaker and then he returns exactly (well probobly not exactly) 1 year after he dissapeared and beat Edge. |
|
