|
|
Post by jomoishollywood on Mar 15, 2008 13:18:46 GMT -5
He does still put on great matches, but he's old. Thats really the only thing I can think that makes him past his prime, that he is going to retire soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Mar 15, 2008 13:23:56 GMT -5
I've never considered myself a fan of him, but there is no denying he can still go. Sure, the ending sequence of every single one of his matches is the exact same set of moves, but the match as a whole is always good.
|
|
|
|
Post by thegr8collector on Mar 15, 2008 13:51:21 GMT -5
i dont think that he should retire i think he should stick around for a few yaers more and then retire
|
|
Fiasco
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 12, 2008 3:32:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,167
|
Post by Fiasco on Mar 15, 2008 15:11:55 GMT -5
NO WAY!
He's still fit enough and he is still able to entertain.
|
|
Kick Your Face
Main Eventer
Real Join Date: Sep 2003
Joined on: Nov 25, 2007 17:32:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,141
|
Post by Kick Your Face on Mar 15, 2008 15:17:51 GMT -5
He needs to be putting over younger guys. They had the perfect time to have Kennedy go over Michaels but they saved it for a tv show. What the hell? THey should've had Kennedy go over Michaels on a PPV not Monday Night RAW. That's pathetic. Here's a perfect example - When Kurt had all the titles in TNA they didn't have him put over "Black Machismo" Jay Lethal on iMPACT. No, they put it on PPV where it would mean something. If WWE would've have put Kennedy over Michaels on PPV that would've put Kennedy over but nooo let's do it on Monday Night RAW and make me go "Bull ****". Perfect. Basically, Shawn needs to start putting over younger guys (along with Triple H). His whole "Sexy Boy" gimmick doesn't work anymore either Shawn doesn't have a problem putting them over. WWE has a problem putting them over. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Mar 15, 2008 15:58:29 GMT -5
Shawn Michaels is passed his prime, yes, but he is still the best wrestler the WWE has.
|
|
