|
Post by The Yes Man on Aug 26, 2014 17:56:55 GMT -5
Sorry, no buys. LT, like Mr T, was a celebrity guest. Daniel Bryan was not -- he's a wrestler who reached the pinnacle of his industry. Alright, then is Bryan better than Flair? Yes, yes he is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 18:07:45 GMT -5
Alright, then is Bryan better than Flair? Yes, yes he is. No no no no no No No No
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Aug 26, 2014 18:26:33 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 18:30:19 GMT -5
Well neither are around currently, so it makes it a lot harder to decide. But Bryan is crisper in the ring while Punk is far superior on the mic. Depends on what you're looking for. Excellently put man.....exactly what I was coming in here to say
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 18:31:51 GMT -5
Lol I was live at that show!
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Aug 26, 2014 19:35:36 GMT -5
It's vary fair, you can't tell the type of performer based on a booking decision on a show. It doesn't prove quality because crap has main evented it before. The original guy said, Bryan is better because he main evented WM, which is a paper accomplishment that you will only get if the company likes you. lol so every accomplishment in wrestling means nothing then, other than the company liked the person? Pretty much, if the company doesn't have faith in you, you go no where. So is literally every single thing you said, but I'm sure you'll ignore that. No, not exactly. Everything on this board is subjective. Some things just make better sense. Like Angle being a better wrestler. Except that doesn't make sense to me. Because he's not a better wrestler. Alright, then is Bryan better than Flair? Yes, yes he is. Now I've heard it all from Bryan fans. Jesus.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 20:42:48 GMT -5
lol so every accomplishment in wrestling means nothing then, other than the company liked the person? Pretty much, if the company doesn't have faith in you, you go no where. No, not exactly. Everything on this board is subjective. Some things just make better sense. Like Angle being a better wrestler. Except that doesn't make sense to me. Because he's not a better wrestler. Now I've heard it all from Bryan fans. Jesus. His Olympic gold medals say otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Aug 26, 2014 20:56:03 GMT -5
Pretty much, if the company doesn't have faith in you, you go no where. Except that doesn't make sense to me. Because he's not a better wrestler. Now I've heard it all from Bryan fans. Jesus. His Olympic gold medals say otherwise. Exactly.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Aug 26, 2014 21:03:58 GMT -5
I forgot the Olympics was related to WWE...oh wait. This isn't a who is a better amateur wrestler, it's about a professional wrestler.
Since we're bring up irrelevant sports to wrestling does Goldbergs football career make him a better wrestler than Benoit?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 21:14:29 GMT -5
I forgot the Olympics was related to WWE...oh wait. This isn't a who is a better amateur wrestler, it's about a professional wrestler. Since we're bring up irrelevant sports to wrestling does Goldbergs football career make him a better wrestler than Benoit? Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Aug 26, 2014 21:17:23 GMT -5
I forgot the Olympics was related to WWE...oh wait. This isn't a who is a better amateur wrestler, it's about a professional wrestler. Since we're bring up irrelevant sports to wrestling does Goldbergs football career make him a better wrestler than Benoit? Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike. There's just no getting through to this guy is there Dillinger?
|
|
|
Post by Wicked on Aug 26, 2014 21:18:09 GMT -5
Bryan maybe because I like his indy stuff more than Punks and Bryan is actually a nice guy.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 21:20:20 GMT -5
Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike. There's just no getting through to this guy is there Dillinger? No sir. Not a bit
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Aug 26, 2014 22:06:53 GMT -5
I forgot the Olympics was related to WWE...oh wait. This isn't a who is a better amateur wrestler, it's about a professional wrestler. Since we're bring up irrelevant sports to wrestling does Goldbergs football career make him a better wrestler than Benoit? Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike. Neither have anything to do with pro wrestling. So yeah, irrelevant. Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike. There's just no getting through to this guy is there Dillinger? Block me then if you don't like my honesty. I don't sugar coat my posts to make you two feel good.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 22:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 22:11:36 GMT -5
Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike. Neither have anything to do with pro wrestling. So yeah, irrelevant. There's just no getting through to this guy is there Dillinger? Block me then if you don't like my honesty. I don't sugar coat my posts to make you two feel good. Whoa with all the hostility dude. Ease up a bit. Maybe try to enjoy life a little
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Aug 26, 2014 22:26:51 GMT -5
Irrelevant? Because Olympic wrestling and football are so much alike. Neither have anything to do with pro wrestling. So yeah, irrelevant. There's just no getting through to this guy is there Dillinger? Block me then if you don't like my honesty. I don't sugar coat my posts to make you two feel good. Your honesty comes off very miserable and angry so fix that.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Aug 26, 2014 22:27:14 GMT -5
Neither have anything to do with pro wrestling. So yeah, irrelevant. Block me then if you don't like my honesty. I don't sugar coat my posts to make you two feel good. Whoa with all the hostility dude. Ease up a bit. Maybe try to enjoy life a little No hostility, and I'm enjoying life. I just prefer my wrestling a certain way, and that's entertainment first and ring skills second. Don't know why you all think I hate everything.
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Aug 27, 2014 7:35:37 GMT -5
Punk takes the edge for me due to much better mic skills. Exactly
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Aug 27, 2014 13:38:36 GMT -5
Punk is by far the better talker, but Bryan is way more likable -- and Bryan's a WrestleMania main eventer. I'm undecided. Had Brock vs Rock or Cena vs Rock III be an option for Mania 30, Bryan would not have main evented a Mania either. You're essentially devaluing Punk as a star because the Rock came back as a bigger star, which to me isn't really fair. Psycho Sid, Chris Jericho, Big Show, Angle, Benoit, Batista, Edge, Orton, Punk arguably has more singular star power than all of those guys and yet he never had a chance to close the show because of the Rock. You can't ignore the landscape of the company during the time of the Mania. If Rock isn't around, we get Cena vs Punk for the title at Mania 29. I agree that a Main Event is something to put on your resume, but Bam Bam Bigelow was not a bigger star than either of Kevin Nash or Shawn Michaels in 1995. Write that off as a celebrity match all you want but Nash is a bigger star than Bam Bam 10 fold and Nash never closed a Mania. Rock really needs to be viewed as a "celebrity" if that's the case, meaning Punk gets a pass if Nash does.
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Aug 27, 2014 13:43:30 GMT -5
Neither have anything to do with pro wrestling. So yeah, irrelevant. Block me then if you don't like my honesty. I don't sugar coat my posts to make you two feel good. Your honesty comes off very miserable and angry so fix that. I disagree. He wasn't out of line or angry. I don't get this response at all.
|
|