TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,885
|
Post by TheXtremisT on May 18, 2009 11:49:29 GMT -5
I really began to notice since 2007 the amount of different injuries wwe superstars were dealt with it just seems there are so many more than in previous years
is it because their roster is so large that at least a few superstars get injured nowadays, and it seems so much due to the large number of superstars, or is it because they work for like 300 days a year including live events, ppv's and house shows, not to mention training
obviously, the more work you do, the more you could get injured (although this case may not be true for kennedy - can i get a high five? never mind)
anyway, in comparison to tna superstars, who take much bigger risks (gimmick matches + x division), why do they not get as injured as much my guess is because they get more time off, as they have what like 4 sets of tapings per month, 1 ppv and some house show (smaller amount than wwe), so therefore less work
your thoughts please
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on May 18, 2009 11:57:09 GMT -5
I do think that WWE needs to cut back on some of their house shows. PPV should be cut back as well. One per month not one three weeks later. And get rid of No Way Out to give the Superstars (and my wallet) more of a break before Wrestlemania. They may push their Superstars to much at times and it hurts the product.
|
|