|
Post by ß®å¢K$ßâ¢k on May 20, 2008 1:13:18 GMT -5
I still think Kane should be up in the front with HHH and Undertaker with Hardy and Jericho behind them, Mickie in the middle and then both tag teams behind them
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on May 20, 2008 1:49:33 GMT -5
Posters don't give away anything, and if you think they do, you're a moron. They produce the posters months ahead of time, while booking decisions aren't made until weeks if not days before they occur. Why would they they bother changing it then? If youd seen the original you might think differently. Because they want it at least semi-current. Posters have never had spoilers, if they did then your theory makes no sense, why not get it right the first time around? The guy making these has about as much knowledge of what's going to happen as the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on May 20, 2008 14:42:03 GMT -5
Why would they they bother changing it then? If youd seen the original you might think differently. Because they want it at least semi-current. Posters have never had spoilers, if they did then your theory makes no sense, why not get it right the first time around? The guy making these has about as much knowledge of what's going to happen as the rest of us. I know that plans always change but if they have plans right now at this moment for any new champions before NOC then i dont think theyd bother. So id almost bet money that the champions on that poster WILL be champions at NOC, so it is somewhat spoilers.
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on May 20, 2008 18:53:50 GMT -5
Because they want it at least semi-current. Posters have never had spoilers, if they did then your theory makes no sense, why not get it right the first time around? The guy making these has about as much knowledge of what's going to happen as the rest of us. I know that plans always change but if they have plans right now at this moment for any new champions before NOC then i dont think theyd bother. So id almost bet money that the champions on that poster WILL be champions at NOC, so it is somewhat spoilers. What? The PPV is a month away, this isn't a backyard federation it's a multi-billion dollar corporation, having uncurrent champions on your poster just makes it look second rate, WWE can afford to make their product look current, at the same time they're not stupid enough to put out spoilers to the public about storylines which they try so desperately to keep under wraps. The reason Taker is on the poster is because he was the last WHC and for pure asthetic value they have him there. Those probably will be the champions come NoC, but it's not because they know it will be it will be because WWE rarely changes belts. I will gurantee you WWE does not publish spoilers on posters for an event, do you understand how stupid that sounds?
|
|
|
Post by King of Kings on May 20, 2008 18:56:12 GMT -5
Or you know..the poster could change..like last year..
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on May 20, 2008 19:04:22 GMT -5
Is it just me, or did the poster seem to look better when Orton was on it? Someone on WF who makes sense? Besides me? Never thought I'd see the day. It's hard not to make sense when you're praising Orton.
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on May 20, 2008 19:07:25 GMT -5
I wonder if they don't make them current then change them later on. Or rather make them at the same time and just make it look like they edited it.
|
|
chokeslamcena
Main Eventer
Anyone got the old SmackDown "minitron" graphics?
Joined on: Mar 22, 2008 12:36:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,840
|
Post by chokeslamcena on May 20, 2008 19:24:16 GMT -5
In relation to my earlier post,
They ruined WrestleMania XX (for me anyway) by releasing the backlash poster and having Benoit all over it, and also, during wrestlemania XX, when they were plugging it, they had benoit clips and everything all over the shop. it was the one event i just avoided the internet, magazines, etc so it wouldn tbe ruined by anyone, then WWE go and spoil it for me themselves.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on May 21, 2008 8:56:32 GMT -5
lol@the ecw title being all the way in back.. It would be much better if it had the 3 main titles in front somehow.. 2 mid card champs next.. Womens champion in the back. This is kinda proof that they consider the ECW title lower then the US title No not necessarily. From a design perspective (the main function of the poster) the ECW title due to its positioning on Kanes waist is best put where it is so it is somewhat visible. Composition wise thats the best place to put it. What your saying would be like the WHC is more important because more of it is shown in the pic than the wwe title. Its nothing like that at all just design composition. ----------- Overall i tihnk the other poster looked better, text was placed better and all. Plus the new poster is 100% face champs.
|
|
T1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 23, 2008 11:51:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,511
|
Post by T1 on May 21, 2008 15:11:40 GMT -5
In relation to my earlier post, They ruined WrestleMania XX (for me anyway) by releasing the backlash poster and having Benoit all over it, and also, during wrestlemania XX, when they were plugging it, they had benoit clips and everything all over the shop. it was the one event i just avoided the internet, magazines, etc so it wouldn tbe ruined by anyone, then WWE go and spoil it for me themselves. Uhh...the 'Mania main event is ALWAYS super predictable. Except for maybe 22 & 23 when Cena won, every 'Mania main event has never been in doubt.. also, the reason the Orton poster is better is because the whole WWE Title could be seen. You could barely see the belt in teh HHH poster.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on May 21, 2008 15:42:58 GMT -5
So did they just drop the name "Vengeance" entirely? Its a stupid event if you ask me. Last year's was terrible. It's just an excuse to have every title defended, regardless of whether or not there is even a half decent reason for it. you are the only one who thinks that. everybody else wants a ppv like this . we want a ppv where all the titles are defended & there history is brought up . so your are wrong & it is not stupid. also last years was great . i don't know what ppv you watched but last years Night Of Champions was great .also Night Of Champions is better then Vengeance Vengeance was one of the worst Pay-Per-View's in recent memory. There wasn't a single memorable match on the card. The main event was sloppily thrown together and made sense, I had a hard enough time even remembering who was in it. The event would be a great idea if any of the matches meant anything. Unfortunately, after One Night Stand, they'll have about two weeks to build a match featuring all the titles. Seeing as pretty much every title feud currently running is incredibly stale, that gives them two weeks to build up fresh new feuds that give the title reason to be defended. That isn't possible, sorry. Three Pay-Per-Views in six to seven weeks essentially ruins all three of them.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on May 21, 2008 18:19:11 GMT -5
In relation to my earlier post, They ruined WrestleMania XX (for me anyway) by releasing the backlash poster and having Benoit all over it, and also, during wrestlemania XX, when they were plugging it, they had benoit clips and everything all over the shop. it was the one event i just avoided the internet, magazines, etc so it wouldn tbe ruined by anyone, then WWE go and spoil it for me themselves. Uhh...the 'Mania main event is ALWAYS super predictable. Except for maybe 22 & 23 when Cena won, every 'Mania main event has never been in doubt.. also, the reason the Orton poster is better is because the whole WWE Title could be seen. You could barely see the belt in teh HHH poster. Wrestlemania 24's main event was nowhere near predictable.
|
|
|
Post by mercennario1080 on May 21, 2008 18:31:17 GMT -5
Why would they they bother changing it then? If youd seen the original you might think differently. Because they want it at least semi-current. Posters have never had spoilers, if they did then your theory makes no sense, why not get it right the first time around? The guy making these has about as much knowledge of what's going to happen as the rest of us. Wasn't that a spoiler?
|
|
|
Post by cenaroxorz123 on May 21, 2008 18:54:10 GMT -5
In relation to my earlier post, They ruined WrestleMania XX (for me anyway) by releasing the backlash poster and having Benoit all over it, and also, during wrestlemania XX, when they were plugging it, they had benoit clips and everything all over the shop. it was the one event i just avoided the internet, magazines, etc so it wouldn tbe ruined by anyone, then WWE go and spoil it for me themselves. Well yeah, he was the top face at that point. I'm pretty sure the Backlash 2005 poster had Triple H on it, but he didn't win at Mania. If you didn't think Benoit was winning you were an idiot anyway. That's like thinking Ric Flair would win at WrestleMania 24.
|
|
|
Post by jorge4903 on May 22, 2008 12:06:41 GMT -5
Poster looked better with orton and mvp on it, and I guess the tag titles aren't worthy to be on the night of champions poster?
|
|