|
|
Post by limatime on Nov 27, 2007 13:59:33 GMT -5
you could have just posted the picture....  |
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on Nov 27, 2007 14:54:49 GMT -5
you could have just posted the picture.... No, because I was thinking of people who maybe didn't want to be spoiled. What does it matter, anyway? Is it too hard to click on a link? |
|
|
|
Post by ecwrvd420 on Nov 27, 2007 15:34:48 GMT -5
you could have just posted the picture.... No, because I was thinking of people who maybe didn't want to be spoiled. What does it matter, anyway? Is it too hard to click on a link? The link doesnt work for me can u post it bro, thanx in advance |
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 27, 2007 15:45:32 GMT -5
The quality of the leaked one is horrible.
Can't wait for the hi-res reveal.
|
|
|
|
Post by limatime on Nov 27, 2007 17:41:52 GMT -5
What spoiler? Do you honestly believe there are people out there who aren't going to look at the Joker until the movie comes out?  |
|
|
|
Post by limatime on Nov 27, 2007 18:21:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Trypod on Nov 27, 2007 19:41:20 GMT -5
I'm onto something.. The message is separated into three paragraphs. Letters from each paragraph are stained in blood. 1st Line - E I T M 2nd Line - O R F 3rd Line - F F T A Y TIME FOR TAFFY I tried whysoserious.com/timefortaffy, but nothin'. And I took the letters from each line, added up their corresponding numbers to the alphabet, and got 47-39-58, but the safe didn't open. But still, it's unscrambled to be TIME FOR TAFFY. |
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Nov 27, 2007 19:47:15 GMT -5
The way they are marketing this film almost makes me wish the villain was The Riddler. I can't imagine what kind of online campaign they could have if he was the villain.
|
|
|
|
Post by limatime on Nov 27, 2007 19:57:53 GMT -5
Set your computer clock to 7:38 am and the safe should open!
|
|
|
|
Post by Trypod on Nov 27, 2007 20:09:00 GMT -5
The contents look like that of a bus driver. www.gothamUSD.com/ is a new site. There's a neat little theory by a poster at Superherohype. It makes sense. Don't read on if you don't want to know stuff.. If you followed the filming from this spring, you'd know that school buses were used for the bank scene they were filming. Presumably it's the scene where The Joker is created, or at least shown for the first time. So it's been rumoured that that's the footage being shown before I Am Legend. The theory is, what if all of these puzzles is us "helping" The Joker set up this bank robbery? We've already "released" the contents of the safe and given him the keys and ID badge of a bus driver. What if the last puzzle takes us to the release date of I Am Legend and the 5-7 minute footage is the school bus/bank robbery scene? If that's how this unfolds, then  me.. it's brilliant. |
|
|
|
Post by limatime on Nov 27, 2007 20:18:49 GMT -5
You should have seen the hype earlier when the new site first went up, you couldn't even get on there it ran so ing slow. that is one hell of a theory and it makes sense. we saw the picture of a bus going through the bank, the joker in the bank, and the joker being filmed at a safe using an imax camera. PLUS all that stuff was shot before any real shooting happened. something like a month to 3 months prior...it would make sense that it was the prologue before I am Legend... |
|
|
|
Post by Trypod on Nov 27, 2007 21:07:42 GMT -5
I have another theory about the Joker. Nothing too brilliant, but..
Remember that first pic of Joker being filmed by the IMAX camera behind the blurred pane of glass? He's so white and his hair is so bushy and green. So chances are, it's when the Joker is first introduced, fresh in his make-up. Yet in other photos, the green is fading, his skin tone is starting to be more visible and his lipstick is smudged. He probably doesn't re-apply his make-up throughout the entire film, so by the end, he must be a sloppy, smeared mess.
I've love the last shot of the movie to be Joker sitting in an Arkham cell with barely any green in his hair, lipstick smudged, and smeared white blotches over his face. Then by the third movie after, possibly, escaping, he'd pretty himself up again and have the white make-up, lipstick, and green hair once again.
I dunno. I'm just shootin' crapout of my ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by bowlofpetunias on Nov 27, 2007 21:33:04 GMT -5
The intersection where the school buses are picking kids up from the Narrows is also the location of a Gotham Bank.
|
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on Nov 27, 2007 21:40:19 GMT -5
I have another theory about the Joker. Nothing too brilliant, but.. Remember that first pic of Joker being filmed by the IMAX camera behind the blurred pane of glass? He's so white and his hair is so bushy and green. So chances are, it's when the Joker is first introduced, fresh in his make-up. Yet in other photos, the green is fading, his skin tone is starting to be more visible and his lipstick is smudged. He probably doesn't re-apply his make-up throughout the entire film, so by the end, he must be a sloppy, smeared mess. I've love the last shot of the movie to be Joker sitting in an Arkham cell with barely any green in his hair, lipstick smudged, and smeared white blotches over his face. Then by the third movie after, possibly, escaping, he'd pretty himself up again and have the white make-up, lipstick, and green hair once again. I dunno. I'm just shootin' **** out of my ass. Um, but wouldn't him having to put make-up defeat the whole purpose of him being the Joker? |
|
purpleisaaw
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 8, 2006 14:56:35 GMT -5
Posts: 2,100
|
Post by purpleisaaw on Nov 27, 2007 22:08:16 GMT -5
wow really creepy i love it cant wait and how did he get so scarred up
|
|
|
|
Post by Trypod on Nov 27, 2007 22:17:08 GMT -5
I have another theory about the Joker. Nothing too brilliant, but.. Remember that first pic of Joker being filmed by the IMAX camera behind the blurred pane of glass? He's so white and his hair is so bushy and green. So chances are, it's when the Joker is first introduced, fresh in his make-up. Yet in other photos, the green is fading, his skin tone is starting to be more visible and his lipstick is smudged. He probably doesn't re-apply his make-up throughout the entire film, so by the end, he must be a sloppy, smeared mess. I've love the last shot of the movie to be Joker sitting in an Arkham cell with barely any green in his hair, lipstick smudged, and smeared white blotches over his face. Then by the third movie after, possibly, escaping, he'd pretty himself up again and have the white make-up, lipstick, and green hair once again. I dunno. I'm just shootin' **** out of my ass. Um, but wouldn't him having to put make-up defeat the whole purpose of him being the Joker? No. You weren't expecting an acid bath, were you? It's an interpretation of The Joker. He has no true origin. In this version, he obviously applies make-up. You can his skin around his neck and his hands. It looks like he applies the make-up, which makes him that much more ed. He's a homicidal nut case and he chooses to dress up like a clown. It's wicked. Why do most people want him to fall into acid? It's been done, and it's not The Joker's definitive origin. He doesn't even have one. So they're going a different route. Let's hope there's no origin at all in this movie. |
|
|
|
Post by limatime on Nov 27, 2007 22:57:09 GMT -5
It's not that they want him to take an acid bath, they just want him permawhite...I think this is the most heated thing since the organic webshooters. Seriously, if he looks and acts like the Joker...then what do people have a problem with?
Oh, and most people think that the story told in "The Killing Joke" is the Joker's definitive origin...whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 28, 2007 0:24:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 28, 2007 5:47:17 GMT -5
I have another theory about the Joker. Nothing too brilliant, but.. Remember that first pic of Joker being filmed by the IMAX camera behind the blurred pane of glass? He's so white and his hair is so bushy and green. So chances are, it's when the Joker is first introduced, fresh in his make-up. Yet in other photos, the green is fading, his skin tone is starting to be more visible and his lipstick is smudged. He probably doesn't re-apply his make-up throughout the entire film, so by the end, he must be a sloppy, smeared mess. I've love the last shot of the movie to be Joker sitting in an Arkham cell with barely any green in his hair, lipstick smudged, and smeared white blotches over his face. Then by the third movie after, possibly, escaping, he'd pretty himself up again and have the white make-up, lipstick, and green hair once again. I dunno. I'm just shootin' **** out of my ass. Um, but wouldn't him having to put make-up defeat the whole purpose of him being the Joker? Definitely not. It's Nolan's vision of what the Joker will be like, not Alan Moore or Tum Burton's. And as Trypod said so beautifully, it's the thought that someone is so ing loopy that they'd dress up as a clown and terrorize a city that's so wicked. |
|
Master Lewpac
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Detroit plays dirty.
Joined on: Apr 12, 2007 1:47:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,890
|
Post by Master Lewpac on Nov 28, 2007 5:57:39 GMT -5
Hell yeah. I cant in wait. I havent been this pumped for a comic book movie since the first X-men. |
|
