Tyler Black
Main Eventer
the former #1 Tyler Black fan/Tyler F'n Black
Joined on: Jul 19, 2009 15:37:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,544
|
Post by Tyler Black on Mar 7, 2011 9:39:04 GMT -5
How come Taker and Austin weren't at mania? that would have made for a much better main event at mania IMO imagine HHH w/steph vs Rock w/Vince vs Taker w/shane vs Austin w/linda! that would have been amazing
|
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Mar 7, 2011 9:57:19 GMT -5
Taker was 2 months away from returning from his groin injury he suffered the previous fall and Austin was recovering from neck surgery he had back the previous fall as well. Both were in no condition to compete at WM hence why we got the main event we did.
It's a shame too, because Taker-Austin-HHH-Rock would've been pretty bad-ass if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Mar 7, 2011 10:30:23 GMT -5
Triple H V The Rock V Stone Cold Steve Austin V Undertaker with a McMahon in every Corner would probably of been the best Main Event in History, if that was the original plan for Wrestlemania 2000. The Match would of been never-ending, the amount of finishers each man would give to everyone, let alone the drama with the McMahon Family being involved.
The McMahons were probably added to the Match we ended up getting as a way to help boost it. They probably wouldn't of been needed had the Main Event featured Austin and Taker in place of Foley and Big Show.
|
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Mar 7, 2011 10:39:52 GMT -5
Yeah the McMahon's totally would not have been needed at all if it was Taker-Austin-HHH-Rock. I mean c'mon it would've been THE top 4 guys of the Attitude era in the same match in the main event of WM! That alone would've made it one of the best WM's ever.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2011 11:16:32 GMT -5
as stated above both were out injured.
loads of people think that WWE had plans for WM2000 before Austin went out but they didnt.they knew after Fully Loaded 99 that Austin was gonna be done soon for a year......
why they didnt go with the way Backlash 2000 went for WM Ill never know.to say it was 1 million times better is a collossal understatement.Rock vs HHH (with Rock going over)was what everyone wanted to see.
|
|
Tyler Black
Main Eventer
the former #1 Tyler Black fan/Tyler F'n Black
Joined on: Jul 19, 2009 15:37:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,544
|
Post by Tyler Black on Mar 7, 2011 13:07:56 GMT -5
Oh okay and ya they really didn't need the Mcmahons but just as added suspense i was just wondering cause Angle vs Jericho vs Benoit was a better match than the main event
|
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Mar 7, 2011 13:42:50 GMT -5
speculation/rumors have said that originally,as far as a long term plan went, Vince wanted an Austin/Big Show World title main event for WM2000 ,but after seeing Show's skills weren't up to par with where he wanted them,and Austin started to break down physically, a lot was changed....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2011 15:47:05 GMT -5
speculation/rumors have said that originally,as far as a long term plan went, Vince wanted an Austin/Big Show World title main event for WM2000 ,but after seeing Show's skills weren't up to par with where he wanted them,and Austin started to break down physically, a lot was changed.... yeah your right man that was the earliest prototype.but honestly nobody gave a poop about Wight because McMahon bungled his introduction. and like I said above anyone wanting to see what the main event of WM2000 should have looked like-see Backlash 2000 for more.absolutely effin awesome. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Mar 7, 2011 16:18:13 GMT -5
The plan was Rock vs. HHH vs. Big Show vs. Chris Jericho, according to Jericho's book, hence the four of them being in all the original advertising, then Jericho was replaced with Foley for some reason (whom btw has never beaten Jericho, broski). Not sure why it happened, but that's not froot.
|
|
Raine
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 8, 2006 12:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 1,505
|
Post by Raine on Mar 7, 2011 16:54:57 GMT -5
Joker, I'm sure Big Show had it written in his contract when he signed from WCW that he would main event WM 2000/16, thats why he is in there. Vince probably regretted soon after
|
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Mar 7, 2011 17:51:19 GMT -5
speculation/rumors have said that originally,as far as a long term plan went, Vince wanted an Austin/Big Show World title main event for WM2000 ,but after seeing Show's skills weren't up to par with where he wanted them,and Austin started to break down physically, a lot was changed.... yeah your right man that was the earliest prototype.but honestly nobody gave a poop about Wight because McMahon bungled his introduction. and like I said above anyone wanting to see what the main event of WM2000 should have looked like-see Backlash 200 for more.absolutely effin awesome. actually the WM main event worked perfectly,at least from a business perspective...after all the buildup,and having them be the final 2 superstars in the match,to have Rock get screwed out of the win by HHH only built MORE anticipation for their one-on-one encounter at Backlash....and it definitely worked,as i remember hearing at the time the buyrates for Backlash were absolutely through the roof.... |
|
|
|
Post by Juba on Mar 7, 2011 18:53:41 GMT -5
eh i would have liked it more if it was 2 different matches. I always though HHH/Rock should have been one on one. And i always thought Austin should have been on takers list of victims at wrestlemania
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2011 12:19:28 GMT -5
Joker, I'm sure Big Show had it written in his contract when he signed from WCW that he would main event WM 2000/16, thats why he is in there. Vince probably regretted soon after I think your correct there chief-I remember that being said somewhere else too... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2011 12:23:08 GMT -5
yeah your right man that was the earliest prototype.but honestly nobody gave a poop about Wight because McMahon bungled his introduction. and like I said above anyone wanting to see what the main event of WM2000 should have looked like-see Backlash 200 for more.absolutely effin awesome. actually the WM main event worked perfectly,at least from a business perspective...after all the buildup,and having them be the final 2 superstars in the match,to have Rock get screwed out of the win by HHH only built MORE anticipation for their one-on-one encounter at Backlash....and it definitely worked,as i remember hearing at the time the buyrates for Backlash were absolutely through the roof.... oh it worked well.the promise of Austins return along with Rock facing impossible odds on the way to his revenge made Backlash 2000 an absolutely awesome outing. plus the match was laid out perfectly.......Austin didnt win it for the Rock-he levelled the playing field.just perfect.plus the crowd was so hyped for Rock and then Austins return the ovations were deafening |
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Mar 8, 2011 15:35:41 GMT -5
If the main event of Wrestlemania 2000 was The Rock vs HHH vs Undertaker vs Stone Cold, then the Undertaker wouldnt have his undefeated streak anymore. The Ultimate Warrior shouldve came back at this event and be in the Big Show's spot.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2011 16:01:07 GMT -5
If the main event of Wrestlemania 2000 was The Rock vs HHH vs Undertaker vs Stone Cold, then the Undertaker wouldnt have his undefeated streak anymore. The Ultimate Warrior shouldve came back at this event and be in the Big Show's spot. The Ultimate Warrior?in the year 2000? you do know the "mighty Warrior"tore muscles to beat the band doing minimal work in WCW in 98?and the less I say about his rep the better. to say he would have been worse than useless in 2000 is being kind. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2011 15:52:02 GMT -5
I don't think Taker should have been in the main event, it wouldnt have been good for streak.
|
|
Raine
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 8, 2006 12:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 1,505
|
Post by Raine on Mar 12, 2011 7:04:49 GMT -5
I don't think the streak would have been a factor as he was only about 8-0 by 2000, it wasn't that big of a deal at this point. So more than likely would have been in there.
Joker's right the Warrior was finished by 1996, nevermind in 2000, not that he was ever much of a talent in his prime.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:49:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2011 13:30:56 GMT -5
when did they start talking about Takers streak at WM?for the life of me I cant remember.I do agree though it wouldnt have been a factor in 2000.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Mar 12, 2011 17:13:28 GMT -5
the first time it was kinda brought up was at WrestleMania X8 , Taker vs Flair....after the match Taker stood outside the ring on the apron and counted out all his fingers up to 10 ,which was his record at the time , 10-0 ,but i don't think the announcers mentioned it,or if they did it was quick and not really focused on at all....
not sure when they "officially" started bringing up the whole Streak thing....
|
|
