TommyHyland46
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 19, 2006 13:43:37 GMT -5
Posts: 2,139
|
Post by TommyHyland46 on Feb 10, 2011 20:07:04 GMT -5
Undertaker vs. Diesel (HBK Special Referee)
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Feb 10, 2011 20:22:55 GMT -5
Kane and Barrett make the most sense based on the Buried alive match.
anyone else and they'll have to build from scratch. Not to mention the fact that it really doesn't matter who Taker wrestles, he's not losing and it won't be as good as the last two Manias. It's a shame the Sting isn't coming, but that really was just fans getting their hopes up anyway, so I never really expected it.
i guess we'll find out in a couple of weeks what's going to happen though.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Feb 10, 2011 22:17:33 GMT -5
Hey guys tell me if you think is a good scenerio: It's Undertaker vs Triple H with Shawn Michaels as the Special Guest Referee. The match is going back and forth and it's getting everyone on the edge of their seats. Taker goes for the boot on Hunter but hits HBK instead by accident. Triple H hits a low blow on Taker and grabs for a chair. He hits Taker with it and goes for the pin, Shawn is about to count the pin but realizes the chair is in the ring. He stops the count and questions Hunter. They trade words until HBK pauses for a sec, hits SCM on Hunter who turns around only to get a Tombstone Piledriver by the Undertaker. HBK counts the 3 and Taker is 19-0.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 10, 2011 22:19:46 GMT -5
Hey guys tell me if you think is a good scenerio: It's Undertaker vs Triple H with Shawn Michaels as the Special Guest Referee. The match is going back and forth and it's getting everyone on the edge of their seats. Taker goes for the boot on Hunter but hits HBK instead by accident. Triple H hits a low blow on Taker and grabs for a chair. He hits Taker with it and goes for the pin, Shawn is about to count the pin but realizes the chair is in the ring. He stops the count and questions Hunter. They trade words until HBK pauses for a sec, hits SCM on Hunter who turns around only to get a Tombstone Piledriver by the Undertaker. HBK counts the 3 and Taker is 19-0. What will be the pay off between HBK/Hunter?
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Feb 10, 2011 22:23:20 GMT -5
Hey guys tell me if you think is a good scenerio: It's Undertaker vs Triple H with Shawn Michaels as the Special Guest Referee. The match is going back and forth and it's getting everyone on the edge of their seats. Taker goes for the boot on Hunter but hits HBK instead by accident. Triple H hits a low blow on Taker and grabs for a chair. He hits Taker with it and goes for the pin, Shawn is about to count the pin but realizes the chair is in the ring. He stops the count and questions Hunter. They trade words until HBK pauses for a sec, hits SCM on Hunter who turns around only to get a Tombstone Piledriver by the Undertaker. HBK counts the 3 and Taker is 19-0. What will be the pay off between HBK/Hunter? Well I just though of that off the top of my head quickly lol. Maybe like this?: Hunter calls out Shawn to the ring the next night. He demands Shawn to tell him why he cost him the match. Shawn says that after losing twice to Taker at WM, he learned that the Streak should never be broken blah blah blah. Hunter orders a match between them at the next PPV, HBK refuses but tells him he does have a match, against his dear close friend Diesel! What do you think of that?
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 10, 2011 22:54:07 GMT -5
Cautiously fist pumps at the idea of Triple H vs Taker with HBK as the special guest referee. Also, how would this have to be built from scratch? They have been building it for 3 years. Undertaker shows up, Triple H shows up, Triple H brings in HBK, the deck is stacked against Taker, the odds seem insurmountable, and there you have your match. I'm sure there would be some kind of screwy finish, something along the lines of SummerSlam 97, but I think that is a big time PPV draw.
Taker will go 19-0 and put an end to the HBK angle, and then he will face Cena to go 20-0, as that will be the only thing left for Taker to do on his way out the door.
If for whatever reason, by some outside chance, it ends up being Nash then I am ok with that as well. I want to see Nash get one more match at Mania, and although the match quality would probably be pretty poor, it would make me feel nostalgic all over. Plus, I still think it would be better than Taker/Barrett.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 2:35:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2011 2:26:37 GMT -5
I'm still holding out for Cena/Taker. Cena loses the Chamber, Punk wins it. Next night Cena says he doesnt know what he's going to do now that he isn't in the Main Event at Mania. It's 2/22/12 so the Deadman returns later in the night attacking Nexus/Corre who are rumbling. He clears the ring then Cena appears and gives him the AA. Tells Taker that he need to make sure he'd do something big at Mania. Same night, Punk and Miz get in an arguement and Punk throws his title shot away that night. Somehow wins the title. And then we get Orton and Punk for the WWE title at Mania.
|
|
|
Post by bestintheworld on Feb 11, 2011 4:52:48 GMT -5
Thank god! I will be there and don't want to see Undertaker vs Barrett. Someone like Sheamus or Triple H is way better and more believable.
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Feb 11, 2011 7:00:55 GMT -5
Taker vs Diesel the rematch 15 years later, Taker vs Diesel II
|
|
|
Post by Terrys Wrestling Figures on Feb 11, 2011 7:37:57 GMT -5
Undertaker vs. Nash, anyone? YES I WOULD LIKE THAT
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 2:35:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2011 9:18:43 GMT -5
So, the WWE wants us to remember Orton screwing CM Punk out of the title over 2 years ago for the sake of their likely Wrestlemania match, but they want us to forget that Undertaker was buried alive by his own brother and The Nexus 5 months ago. Makes sense to me! I don't see any logical way they could include HBK in Undertaker's match, no matter who he's facing. They have less than a month to build up a feud for Undertaker and including HBK would seem like they're cramming everything together way too fast. Barrett or Kane makes the most sense since it would take relatively no build up to it. Hell. I don't care if they make sense but I DO NOT want to see Taker/Barret or Taker/Kane. Neither sound interesting and I can gurantee both would be mediocre compared to a Taker/HHH match.
|
|
|
Post by bountyhunterblood5 on Feb 11, 2011 9:57:52 GMT -5
People dont wanna see Barrett and Taker but wanna see Nash and Taker. I love Nash and all but that match shouldnt happen for many reasons.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 11, 2011 10:50:47 GMT -5
Nash vs Taker looks great, but.... the paste of the match....idk.
Triple H vs Undertaker would be the best option if nothing else big happens. I thought all long Triple H was the one who told Nexus to bury Taker.
But also, the negative part of HHH and Taker is that its gonna be like HBK story all over again.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 2:35:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2011 10:57:32 GMT -5
I'm still holding out for Cena/Taker. Cena loses the Chamber, Punk wins it. Next night Cena says he doesnt know what he's going to do now that he isn't in the Main Event at Mania. It's 2/22/12 so the Deadman returns later in the night attacking Nexus/Corre who are rumbling. He clears the ring then Cena appears and gives him the AA. Tells Taker that he need to make sure he'd do something big at Mania. Same night, Punk and Miz get in an arguement and Punk throws his title shot away that night. Somehow wins the title. And then we get Orton and Punk for the WWE title at Mania. < 3
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Feb 11, 2011 10:58:56 GMT -5
Nash vs Taker looks great, but.... the paste of the match....idk. Triple H vs Undertaker would be the best option if nothing else big happens. I thought all long Triple H was the one who told Nexus to bury Taker. But also, the negative part of HHH and Taker is that its gonna be like HBK story all over again.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 11, 2011 11:08:01 GMT -5
Nash vs Taker looks great, but.... the paste of the match....idk. Triple H vs Undertaker would be the best option if nothing else big happens. I thought all long Triple H was the one who told Nexus to bury Taker. But also, the negative part of HHH and Taker is that its gonna be like HBK story all over again. Lol.. my bad i meant, fast-paced.
|
|
Nash
Main Eventer
True join date = May 2006
Joined on: Apr 8, 2010 14:48:43 GMT -5
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by Nash on Feb 14, 2011 1:13:07 GMT -5
Undertaker vs. Nash, anyone? YES PLEASE!! I would love Taker vs. Diesel II. Will it be the greatest technical match in the world? No obviously not. But for the general audience, and if they build it up right, it would be farrrr more believable then Wade freakin' Barrett. My idea was to have Diesel/Show vs. Corre in a 3-on-1, but this would be much better. With that all being said, I have a bad feeling it will just be Kane again
|
|
|
Post by vivadelrio on Feb 14, 2011 10:48:43 GMT -5
Undertaker has a bad injury how do you know he will be back for wrestlemania i hope he doesnt come back any time soon he has lost his touch if he ever had it at wrestlemania he rides off the back of other hall of famers who try desperately to make him look good but without his gimmick no one would like him nearly as much
|
|
hulkamaniac1055
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 3, 2011 1:08:24 GMT -5
Posts: 402
|
Post by hulkamaniac1055 on Feb 14, 2011 11:40:34 GMT -5
In my mind WWE is making a big mistake with these hype videos for 2-21-11. Those videos look like the Sting Starrcade 1997 videos and WWE is stupid for putting those on there if they don't have Sting. I like Taker but those videos are fake hyping Sting and I don't think I'm the only one thinking that. Triple H vs. Taker will be a horrible match if it happens. They had an excellent match at Wrestlemania 17, but they are both older and in worse shape now.
True HBK and Taker were both older at the past 2 Wrestlemanias, but HBK is in a lot better physical shape than Taker and Triple H. Triple H and Taker need opponents that can keep the action alive because these days they can't carry a match they have to have help. I'm not saying Sting vs. Taker would be a great match but it would be better than Triple H vs. Taker. If it were up to me I'd book Taker vs. Sheamus for Wrestlemania (if they would actually push him serious again).
Bottom line WWE has messed up bad to me if the 2-21 stuff is not Sting because they have fake hyped him, and I know I'm not the only one who thinks that. How do I get I'm not the only one feeling that is fake hype for Sting? The next day all kinds of Sting rumors were going around so I'm not alone on thinking that.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 14, 2011 12:12:03 GMT -5
In my mind WWE is making a big mistake with these hype videos for 2-21-11. Those videos look like the Sting Starrcade 1997 videos and WWE is stupid for putting those on there if they don't have Sting. I like Taker but those videos are fake hyping Sting and I don't think I'm the only one thinking that. Triple H vs. Taker will be a horrible match if it happens. They had an excellent match at Wrestlemania 17, but they are both older and in worse shape now. True HBK and Taker were both older at the past 2 Wrestlemanias, but HBK is in a lot better physical shape than Taker and Triple H. Triple H and Taker need opponents that can keep the action alive because these days they can't carry a match they have to have help. I'm not saying Sting vs. Taker would be a great match but it would be better than Triple H vs. Taker. If it were up to me I'd book Taker vs. Sheamus for Wrestlemania (if they would actually push him serious again). Bottom line WWE has messed up bad to me if the 2-21 stuff is not Sting because they have fake hyped him, and I know I'm not the only one who thinks that. How do I get I'm not the only one feeling that is fake hype for Sting? The next day all kinds of Sting rumors were going around so I'm not alone on thinking that. Exactly! And i don't think the WWE is gonna mislead us, or let us down going toward WrestleMania. Thats messing with money right there.
|
|