|
|
WCW
Sept 16, 2010 11:51:37 GMT -5
Post by bountyhunterblood5 on Sept 16, 2010 11:51:37 GMT -5
Who here thinks WCW could have went longer then it did if management was better. I had a convo with a few people bout this alot of people think that it would have came to an end anyway. I feel with a lil better management and not signing nothing but former stars they would have lasted longer.
|
|
|
|
WCW
Sept 16, 2010 13:12:11 GMT -5
Post by carly1988 on Sept 16, 2010 13:12:11 GMT -5
I think Jim Crockett Promotions could have done better had it been under better management. It had top names (home grownish) and almost always pulled profit until its final couple years.
WCW (Ted Turner owned) failed to make a profit from the onset until 97ish. Then it was back to losing profit in 99ish. WCW, as great as it was, was a very slow sinking ship. Better management and the AOL/Time Warner merger would have kept WCW afloat for a while, however unless it got another backer I wouldnt see it around 10-20 years later.
|
|
|
|
WCW
Sept 16, 2010 16:53:51 GMT -5
Post by slappy on Sept 16, 2010 16:53:51 GMT -5
If they had a tv slot, it'd probably still be around. Nothing about management. Their downfall was no tv timeslot. If they had one, Bischoff would be the owner and we might not have TNA.
|
|
