Nitro
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 29, 2006 18:50:40 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by Nitro on Jun 28, 2008 15:12:19 GMT -5
We don't often see matches were a villain collides with another villain or a hero vs another hero but when we do which do you find more entertaining?
Personally I find Heel vs Heel matches more interesting with two massive egos colliding, a good example would be back in early 2005/late 2004 were Triple H was a massive heel on RAW while JBL was the biggest heel on smackdown. having them wrestle now doesnt mean anything but back then it would have been really cool.
Anyway you decide
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Jun 28, 2008 15:16:16 GMT -5
That has to be heel Vs heel. Well, depend on who, really. Such as if we got Heel Y2J Vs Heel Edge, then that would be great.
|
|
|
Post by vaclav on Jun 28, 2008 15:20:10 GMT -5
i remember before No Mercy 2006, it was Batista vs Lashley, and Finlay vs. King Booker. the heels' match was so much better, although that's more to do with the face match involving Lashley and Batista
|
|
|
Post by Ashley Shaffer BMW on Jun 28, 2008 15:23:37 GMT -5
Face vs face Hulk vs Warrior... Wrestlemania 6 Hart vs HBK... Wrestlemania 12 RVD vs Cena... ONS (both were face at the time, even though Cena got a lot of heat
|
|
|
Post by justamazing on Jun 28, 2008 15:32:58 GMT -5
i remember before No Mercy 2006, it was Batista vs Lashley, and Finlay vs. King Booker. the heels' match was so much better, although that's more to do with the face match involving Lashley and Batista It was Finlay vs Batista and Lashley vs Booker. They then changed it into a fatal four way for the world title a few weeks after them matches were made.
|
|
|
Post by Cass on Jun 28, 2008 15:44:50 GMT -5
i remember before No Mercy 2006, it was Batista vs Lashley, and Finlay vs. King Booker. the heels' match was so much better, although that's more to do with the face match involving Lashley and Batista It was Finlay vs Batista and Lashley vs Booker. They then changed it into a fatal four way for the world title a few weeks after them matches were made. he said before no mercy, not at no mercy.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Jun 28, 2008 16:16:59 GMT -5
Face vs face works better. It really makes money in my opinion. Face vs face Hulk vs Warrior... Wrestlemania 6 Hart vs HBK... Wrestlemania 12 RVD vs Cena... ONS (both were face at the time, even though Cena got a lot of heat You forgot Cena vs Lashley at Great American Bash 2007 and HBK vs Hogan at Summerslam.
|
|
T1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 23, 2008 11:51:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,511
|
Post by T1 on Jun 28, 2008 16:19:54 GMT -5
Face vs face works better. It really makes money in my opinion. Face vs face Hulk vs Warrior... Wrestlemania 6 Hart vs HBK... Wrestlemania 12 RVD vs Cena... ONS (both were face at the time, even though Cena got a lot of heat You forgot Cena vs Lashley at Great American Bash 2007 and HBK vs Hogan at Summerslam. HBK was heel. I'm surprised everybody's forgetting one of the biggest face vs. face matches of all time...Austin/Rock at WMX-Seven.
|
|
|
Post by fallenhero on Jun 28, 2008 16:22:26 GMT -5
Face vs face works better. It really makes money in my opinion. Face vs face Hulk vs Warrior... Wrestlemania 6 Hart vs HBK... Wrestlemania 12 RVD vs Cena... ONS (both were face at the time, even though Cena got a lot of heat You forgot Cena vs Lashley at Great American Bash 2007 and HBK vs Hogan at Summerslam. HBK worked heel going into SummerSlam 05.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Jun 28, 2008 16:34:59 GMT -5
Face vs. face matches seem to be more interesting to me. With heel vs. heel, the crowd has no one to cheer for, so why should they care?
|
|
garseys
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Apr 30, 2008 16:23:37 GMT -5
Posts: 137
|
Post by garseys on Jun 28, 2008 18:41:14 GMT -5
What a match!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 13:53:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2008 18:46:56 GMT -5
Face vs face are always amazing when pulled off right..
Their face off withe the crowd 50/50... They wrestle, one face gets mad and cheats alittle, other face win, they make up at the end.. Hug, hand raise...
I like it, leave me alone
|
|
Ryan
Main Eventer
True Join Date: 2006
Joined on: Jun 22, 2008 5:35:29 GMT -5
Posts: 1,638
|
Post by Ryan on Jun 28, 2008 19:10:58 GMT -5
Heels vs. Heels are quite good.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 13:53:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2008 19:12:24 GMT -5
To me, heel ve heels are bad...
There's no shine (Cause there's no face), there's no heat (cause their both heel), and no come back (Cause not's not heat)
With face vs face
There's a shine, heat starts when one of the faces cheats to get the upper hand, and there a comeback cause there's heat..
|
|
|
Post by Bartman on Jun 28, 2008 19:35:45 GMT -5
Face vs Face are so much better.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jun 28, 2008 19:42:26 GMT -5
Rock vs. Hogan, I rest my case. Yes Hogan played a heel going into the match at WM, but you would have never known it according to the fan reactions for both.
|
|
|
Post by Groundswell on Jun 28, 2008 20:03:38 GMT -5
Heel vs Heel, Much better.
|
|
|
Post by darksideofthemoon on Jun 28, 2008 23:39:49 GMT -5
Heel vs Heel because most of the time the crowd cheers for the face but if it is heel and heel who will the crowd vote for?.
|
|
B.D. & El G.
Main Eventer
RIP SNS 2/15/82 - 4/11/11
Joined on: Jan 2, 2008 17:52:29 GMT -5
Posts: 4,113
|
Post by B.D. & El G. on Jun 29, 2008 1:44:21 GMT -5
Heel vs. heel is better because the people then cheer for the better wrestler over the face over the heel.
|
|
Wago
Main Eventer
Prepare To Get Wagowned.
Joined on: Mar 29, 2006 9:11:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by Wago on Jun 29, 2008 7:13:19 GMT -5
Heel vs Heel, as long as they do it right. More agressive, and just enjoyable to watch to heels against each other and how they react to stuff, it rocks. Now as for Babyface vs Babyface, it's only enjoyable when one of them acts heelish, other wise unless the match has got spots in, it normally is a snooze fest, but there have been times where two faces have put on an awesome wrestling clinic, it's just rare.
|
|