|
Post by Hammersmith Hardman on Jun 20, 2008 2:54:58 GMT -5
It would never happen nor would I like it to happen.
|
|
|
Post by karobrokaro on Jun 20, 2008 4:32:56 GMT -5
Yeah, it'd be a great idea if WCW didnt absolutely blow. there's a reason why it's no longer on the air. it's not because of lack of funding, it's because the product was ridiculously terrible. like worse than TNA terrible, and that's lowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Jun 20, 2008 6:53:37 GMT -5
ehh i think its to late for this sorta PPV..
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on Jun 20, 2008 7:21:27 GMT -5
Yeah, it'd be a great idea if WCW didnt absolutely blow. there's a reason why it's no longer on the air. it's not because of lack of funding, it's because the product was ridiculously terrible. like worse than TNA terrible, and that's lowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww No, WCW wasn't terrible, obviously you never watched it. In like the last year admitingly it was bad but that was due to alot of people jumping ship, the general dismay backstage, the direction and the writing. WCW always had top talent, and their matches and storylines were deffinitly a healthy alternative to the WWF for a very long time, hell they didn't beat WWF in the ratings for a ridiculous amount of weeks for nothing. Obviously you know nothing about WCW as funding directly for the show was never really that big of an an issue, WCW didn't go out of business, it wasn't bankrupt, it was bought by WWF/E because Time Warner was merging with AOL and it was felt that wrestling was not the image they wanted for their new company. Prior to 2000 and some questionable booking WCW was in my mind always on the same level with WWF, it was like Coke and Pepsi, two bustling companies competing for the inside edge. I myself am not a blatant idiot, so I'm not even going to say TNA is bad, it's got some really good talent and on occasion I've seen good matches. However it's just ignorant to suggest TNA has ever been on the same level as WWE, WCW however was consistently on WWF's level, product and rating wise. So please either shut up about a show you clearly never watched or elaborate on your original evaluation.
|
|
|
Post by cenaroxorz123 on Jun 20, 2008 7:36:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by karobrokaro on Jun 20, 2008 7:44:37 GMT -5
Please Marrrrrrk Twain. Read what i wrote, then re-read the garbage story you wrote in response. WCW was and got even more terrible before being dropped. Check. Time warner didnt want to associate with them anymore because the product became terrible. Check. TNA is pretty terrible, not the wrestlers, but the product. So comparing the two in terms of Terribleness is acceptable. Check I clearly said they didnt have a money issue. Check Your wrong. Check Im Right. Check Pretty much cleared that up. Check Yeah, it'd be a great idea if WCW didnt absolutely blow. there's a reason why it's no longer on the air. it's not because of lack of funding, it's because the product was ridiculously terrible. like worse than TNA terrible, and that's lowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww No, WCW wasn't terrible, obviously you never watched it. In like the last year admitingly it was bad but that was due to alot of people jumping ship, the general dismay backstage, the direction and the writing. WCW always had top talent, and their matches and storylines were deffinitly a healthy alternative to the WWF for a very long time, hell they didn't beat WWF in the ratings for a ridiculous amount of weeks for nothing. Obviously you know nothing about WCW as funding directly for the show was never really that big of an an issue, WCW didn't go out of business, it wasn't bankrupt, it was bought by WWF/E because Time Warner was merging with AOL and it was felt that wrestling was not the image they wanted for their new company. Prior to 2000 and some questionable booking WCW was in my mind always on the same level with WWF, it was like Coke and Pepsi, two bustling companies competing for the inside edge. I myself am not a blatant idiot, so I'm not even going to say TNA is bad, it's got some really good talent and on occasion I've seen good matches. However it's just ignorant to suggest TNA has ever been on the same level as WWE, WCW however was consistently on WWF's level, product and rating wise. So please either shut up about a show you clearly never watched or elaborate on your original evaluation.
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on Jun 20, 2008 8:02:41 GMT -5
Please Marrrrrrk Twain. Read what i wrote, then re-read the garbage story you wrote in response. WCW was and got even more terrible before being dropped. Check. Not exactly, alot of WCW's failures can be attributed to the selling. It was no secret in the company that WCW was being shopped around, numerous wrestlers have claimed a feeling of no direction or motivation with in the company at this time due to this.Time warner didnt want to associate with them anymore because the product became terrible. Check. Wrong, TimeWarner decided to distance itself from wrestling because of the negative attention it was getting from the media, it had little to do with the quality of WCWTNA is pretty terrible, not the wrestlers, but the product.comparing the two in terms of Terribleness is acceptable. Check Aside from being completly opinion I can't understand what makes TNA "terrible", like you've even admitted they have great wrestlers, great wrestlers put on great matches, great matches of wrestling...I clearly said they didnt have a money issue. Check Your wrong. Check Im Right. Check Pretty much cleared that up. Check So judging a company with origins of at least 20 years on a one year transition buy out is acceptable? It's been admitted many times over that WCW was not the greatest thing prior to it's buy out, but it's quite short sighted to let that void all of the years prior to that. It just insults your intelligence to attempt to say that a company that beat WWF alot in what is considered the greatest era of the WWF was "terrible". I'm not sure what your hang up about WCW was, or why I'm a "mark". No, WCW wasn't terrible, obviously you never watched it. In like the last year admitingly it was bad but that was due to alot of people jumping ship, the general dismay backstage, the direction and the writing. WCW always had top talent, and their matches and storylines were deffinitly a healthy alternative to the WWF for a very long time, hell they didn't beat WWF in the ratings for a ridiculous amount of weeks for nothing. Obviously you know nothing about WCW as funding directly for the show was never really that big of an an issue, WCW didn't go out of business, it wasn't bankrupt, it was bought by WWF/E because Time Warner was merging with AOL and it was felt that wrestling was not the image they wanted for their new company. Prior to 2000 and some questionable booking WCW was in my mind always on the same level with WWF, it was like Coke and Pepsi, two bustling companies competing for the inside edge. I myself am not a blatant idiot, so I'm not even going to say TNA is bad, it's got some really good talent and on occasion I've seen good matches. However it's just ignorant to suggest TNA has ever been on the same level as WWE, WCW however was consistently on WWF's level, product and rating wise. So please either shut up about a show you clearly never watched or elaborate on your original evaluation.
|
|
|
Post by Keyboard Cat on Jun 20, 2008 12:02:36 GMT -5
IF you include WWE/TNA and Indys and guys who are retired/disabled then the best lineup I could do would be... Sting Vs. Ric Flair Dusty Rhodes vs Terry Funk (Texas Bullrope Match) Dustin Rhodes & Barry Windham vs Shane Douglas & Ricky Steamboat Lex Luger vs Nikita Koloff Midnight Express vs Rock N Roll Express Steiner Brothers vs Arn/Tully Doom vs Harlem Heat That a good line up but most of it's a little too old school, Chris Jericho, Sid Vicious, and DDP should be some where on there.
|
|
|
Post by karobrokaro on Jun 20, 2008 20:13:23 GMT -5
So essentially, you're just typing novel sized responses to agree with me? Cool, i guess. The only part of WCW i am interested in is the luchas and i have Tripla AHhh to watch and CMLL. WCW couldnt have a reunion as all of the top draws are either dead, paralized, or worse... Commentating on MMA and locked up videoblogging on youtube. You expect someone to sit through Disco Inferno Mirror Matches all night??? Please Marrrrrrk Twain. Read what i wrote, then re-read the garbage story you wrote in response. WCW was and got even more terrible before being dropped. Check. Not exactly, alot of WCW's failures can be attributed to the selling. It was no secret in the company that WCW was being shopped around, numerous wrestlers have claimed a feeling of no direction or motivation with in the company at this time due to this.Time warner didnt want to associate with them anymore because the product became terrible. Check. Wrong, TimeWarner decided to distance itself from wrestling because of the negative attention it was getting from the media, it had little to do with the quality of WCWTNA is pretty terrible, not the wrestlers, but the product.comparing the two in terms of Terribleness is acceptable. Check Aside from being completly opinion I can't understand what makes TNA "terrible", like you've even admitted they have great wrestlers, great wrestlers put on great matches, great matches of wrestling...I clearly said they didnt have a money issue. Check Your wrong. Check Im Right. Check Pretty much cleared that up. Check So judging a company with origins of at least 20 years on a one year transition buy out is acceptable? It's been admitted many times over that WCW was not the greatest thing prior to it's buy out, but it's quite short sighted to let that void all of the years prior to that. It just insults your intelligence to attempt to say that a company that beat WWF alot in what is considered the greatest era of the WWF was "terrible". I'm not sure what your hang up about WCW was, or why I'm a "mark".
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on Jun 20, 2008 22:14:11 GMT -5
So essentially, you're just typing novel sized responses to agree with me? Cool, i guess. The only part of WCW i am interested in is the luchas and i have Tripla AHhh to watch and CMLL. WCW couldnt have a reunion as all of the top draws are either dead, paralized, or worse... Commentating on MMA and locked up videoblogging on youtube. You expect someone to sit through Disco Inferno Mirror Matches all night??? Agree with you? I think you've been hitting that rock a little too much lately. I'm not agreeing with you on anything but the fact that in it's last year WCW was terrible, everyone agrees on that. You're so narrow minded though that you judged the company based off the last year of it's existence. Also if my posts are "novel size" to you, then may God himself help our education system. If you're so dimwitted that you can force yourself to read a paragraph then you better start selling the rock you're smoking because you're not going anywhere. Also once you've mastered this art of reading, maybe you could venture to the first page and read my post where I said a reunion show COULD NOT HAPPEN. Yeah I never said a reunion show could be possible. After you've done this, I'll allow an hour because it is like a 4 paragraph post and I know you, I expect you to actually respond for once to points I make. Big boys don't just throw more opinions out there they also defend the ones under attack.
|
|
|
Post by karobrokaro on Jun 20, 2008 22:26:44 GMT -5
please type more crap im not gonna read i get it, we both agree. move on already. WCW blew, hence it's dead. get it, got it, greeeeeeeat So essentially, you're just typing novel sized responses to agree with me? Cool, i guess. The only part of WCW i am interested in is the luchas and i have Tripla AHhh to watch and CMLL. WCW couldnt have a reunion as all of the top draws are either dead, paralized, or worse... Commentating on MMA and locked up videoblogging on youtube. You expect someone to sit through Disco Inferno Mirror Matches all night??? Agree with you? I think you've been hitting that rock a little too much lately. I'm not agreeing with you on anything but the fact that in it's last year WCW was terrible, everyone agrees on that. You're so narrow minded though that you judged the company based off the last year of it's existence. Also if my posts are "novel size" to you, then may God himself help our education system. If you're so dimwitted that you can force yourself to read a paragraph then you better start selling the rock you're smoking because you're not going anywhere. Also once you've mastered this art of reading, maybe you could venture to the first page and read my post where I said a reunion show COULD NOT HAPPEN. Yeah I never said a reunion show could be possible. After you've done this, I'll allow an hour because it is like a 4 paragraph post and I know you, I expect you to actually respond for once to points I make. Big boys don't just throw more opinions out there they also defend the ones under attack.
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on Jun 20, 2008 22:49:37 GMT -5
Oh I get it, is this your lame as shtick being an internet badass (saaaaad) or is this your cop out of getting owned? Actually this was way too long for you to read so I'll make it easy
TYPE "A" IF OWNED TYPE "B" IF JUST STUPID
|
|