With the quality of WWE these days.....

[Stinger TNA]

Yeah, with the quality being pretty bad, which would you say is better?

[Deleted]

Is this a joke? Every WWE ppv this year has been pretty damn good, and while not all storylines are that great, I still think it could be a lot worse. Or did we all forget 2005?

[carly1988]

Being from the South, I will and always will prefer WCW/NWA over WWE/F but WWE isnt that far down as WCW was, yet

[Deleted]

WWE is nowhere near the position WCW was in their last days. If they can afford to give away three million dollars, I think they're okay.

[Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades]

Oh my, i'd definately have to say wcw was way worse which isnt easy because at one time i was a preferred them over wwf/e. I'd dont think E's ever been as low as the ladder WCW days.

[sincityhero]

I'd rather watch dieing WCW at this point.

[scoobypat]

All 4 people who voted for WCW clearly never watched a WCW show that year. WWE isn't really doing that bad quality wise, it's actually the fact that most people here just sit around and fantasize about the past that makes it seem like its terrible. Every year people talk about how terrible the WWE is and every year they reference a point in the past when it was "awesome", people have been doing this forever, yes even in the attitude era people did this. Don't believe me, just look at how many people look back at 2003-2004 with fondness now, arguably the worst time in the WWE now people are all over it. It's basically the fact that once you're removed from the situation you ignore all the negatives about it because you can.

[Kasper]

Jun 17, 2008 18:41:55 GMT -5 scoobypat said:

All 4 people who voted for WCW clearly never watched a WCW show that year. WWE isn't really doing that bad quality wise, it's actually the fact that most people here just sit around and fantasize about the past that makes it seem like its terrible. Every year people talk about how terrible the WWE is and every year they reference a point in the past when it was "awesome", people have been doing this forever, yes even in the attitude era people did this. Don't believe me, just look at how many people look back at 2003-2004 with fondness now, arguably the worst time in the WWE now people are all over it. It's basically the fact that once you're removed from the situation you ignore all the negatives about it because you can.

Actually i loved WWE in 2002-2004. Im not just saying that now, its because every week I would look forward to it. But yea i see what your saying.

[Deleted]

I aswell loved 2004, i voted for current WWE, i dont really see the point in getting so riled up over a TV show.

[justamazing]

My favourite WWE year was 2005 actually...

[sincityhero]

I thought 2004 was good acually, eddie and benoit finally got on top. and 2003 had Da MaN GOOOLDBERG.

[Flava Dave]

WWE may be bad, but it's not "Billy Kidman feuding with Hulk Hogan" bad.

[sincityhero]

Jun 17, 2008 19:16:41 GMT -5 Flava Dave said:

WWE may be bad, but it's not "Billy Kidman feuding with Hulk Hogan" bad.

Hornswoggle feuding with anyone, especially for tag titles is probably worse.

[cenaroxorz123]

Jun 17, 2008 18:41:55 GMT -5 scoobypat said:

Don't believe me, just look at how many people look back at 2003-2004 with fondness now, arguably the worst time in the WWE now people are all over it. It's basically the fact that once you're removed from the situation you ignore all the negatives about it because you can.

Or maybe some people don't think 2003-2004 was the worst time in WWE. .Though I am surprised how many people enjoyed WCW 2000-2001 more than WWE today. If that's what you voted you should try watching TNA, it's pretty random these days.

[scoobypat]

Jun 17, 2008 19:40:32 GMT -5 @cenaroxorz123 said:

Jun 17, 2008 18:41:55 GMT -5 scoobypat said:

Don't believe me, just look at how many people look back at 2003-2004 with fondness now, arguably the worst time in the WWE now people are all over it. It's basically the fact that once you're removed from the situation you ignore all the negatives about it because you can.

Or maybe some people don't think 2003-2004 was the worst time in WWE.

If I could go through one day where people on this forum would read entire posts, then hell will have truely frozen over.

[The Funniest Guy in Pants]

I don't know that WCW in it's dying days was any better than the crap we get now, but I did choose WCW because I actually cared about most of the guys on the roster. I couldn't give two craps about 90% of today's WWE roster.

[COCK & BLAST]

Back then, I thought WCW 2000-2001 was pretty damn bad. If only I knew what was yet to come...

[cenaroxorz123]

Jun 17, 2008 19:43:02 GMT -5 scoobypat said:

Jun 17, 2008 19:40:32 GMT -5 @cenaroxorz123 said:

Or maybe some people don't think 2003-2004 was the worst time in WWE.

If I could go through one day where people on this forum would read entire posts, then hell will have truely frozen over.

I'm saying that's not "proof" because not everyone thinks that time period was so bad. Do I have to respond to the entire post?

[Deleted]

IMO, WWE is doing a great job right now so I would rather watch the current product. Also, WWE lacks Russo's gay storylines and David Arquette, that is a plus. The dying days of WCW sucked ass.

[Deleted]

People seem to forget that 2001 was a good year for WCW in terms of quality.