|
|
Post by takingyouout on May 23, 2008 0:51:18 GMT -5
to be cool?
I am being honest, I really do not. I do, however, love defending heels when people that ALWAYS love the faces, think the faces are the best.
You?
|
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on May 23, 2008 0:56:42 GMT -5
On screen? Definately heels. I find them much more entertaining. At least certain ones.
|
|
|
|
Post by AndyPeck13 on May 23, 2008 1:03:42 GMT -5
it depends on the person/match...i could prob. cheer for either the face or heel...
but i won't go out of my way to cheer a heel just to try to make myself look cool or anything if that's what you're saying
|
|
|
|
Post by Hurricane on May 23, 2008 1:05:45 GMT -5
I like wrestlers that are talented and interested, no matter what their character is (Heel/Face/Tweener).
|
|
|
|
Post by Kody on May 23, 2008 8:42:35 GMT -5
Heels, I think are far more interesting, character wise. So I, and I'm sure others, tend to like them more.
But whoever I am a true fan of, it doesn't matter if their face or heel, such as Shawn Michaels. I find him entertaining as both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on May 23, 2008 8:49:29 GMT -5
The heel always seems to have a much more dynamic, interesting character that the Fans find entertaining. It's very hard to be a face but at the same time, have such a dynamic character. Heels have such free range and they can do so much to get people to boo them and the faces are limited because there is only so much they can do to keep people cheering them...
|
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on May 23, 2008 8:54:01 GMT -5
it depends on the person/match...i could prob. cheer for either the face or heel... but i won't go out of my way to cheer a heel just to try to make myself look cool or anything if that's what you're saying Same here. Just depends on the match.  |
|
|
|
Post by S on May 23, 2008 9:34:07 GMT -5
As a general rule, i find heels more entertaining as they have more in-depth characters... i mean, compare the heel persona's of Mick Foley, as he heel he had the ECW Cactus Jack and the debut Mankind, as a face, we got the goofier Mankind which was a great character, but the others were just better in my opinion... sometimes there are face characters i like which i wouldn't like as heels (for example, the b.W.o), but that is a minority.
Like Kody said, there are some wrestlers i'd be interested in whether they are heel or face.
With your cool arguement, i this that sub-consiously, everyone past a certian age starts likeing heel wrestlers as much, or more than face wrestlers, but i just think that because they understand it better than some of the younger fans
|
|
|
|
Post by Optimus Prime on May 23, 2008 11:21:47 GMT -5
Over the years I've been finding myself liking the heels a lot more than the faces. They have more dynamic characters, better interviews, and are just more interesting. It really used to be the opposite back in the Attitude Era, back then I found faces to have all those qualities.
|
|
|
|
Post by S on May 23, 2008 11:25:52 GMT -5
Over the years I've been finding myself liking the heels a lot more than the faces. They have more dynamic characters, better interviews, and are just more interesting. It really used to be the opposite back in the Attitude Era, back then I found faces to have all those qualities. Just curious, how old were you in the attitude era... as you may be proof of what i was thinking |
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on May 23, 2008 11:37:34 GMT -5
Depend on their gimmick, such as Carlito as heel was work very well, so do Ken Kennedy, MVP. They even still get cheered.
And I do like big wrestlers name as heel, as well, such as JBL, Kane, HHH, and HBK
|
|
|
|
Post by jomoishollywood on May 23, 2008 12:50:37 GMT -5
I just cant like a face, its basically automatic now.
|
|
|
|
Post by edgerules17 on May 23, 2008 12:55:37 GMT -5
Heels are much better than faces IMO. All my favorite wrestlers are heels. Edge, Orton, Regal, Santino, Burke, Miz, Morrison. All heels. I do like a few faces but not nearly as many.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ashley Shaffer BMW on May 23, 2008 13:20:04 GMT -5
I like wrestlers that are talented and interested, no matter what their character is (Heel/Face/Tweener). Took the words right out of my mouth |
|
|
|
Post by Hammersmith Hardman on May 23, 2008 14:08:39 GMT -5
I prefer Heels becuase the Faces are boring and very predictable.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on May 23, 2008 17:46:40 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm a fan of a wrestler on merit. I don't care if they're heel or face.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalDivaCustoms on May 23, 2008 18:45:55 GMT -5
If my favorite wrestler is Heel, then I'll go with the Heels, But yeah the heel wrestlers sometimes end up with the best of a situation..
|
|
|
|
Post by The 'Rated R Superstar' Edge on May 23, 2008 19:48:06 GMT -5
To be cool? I thought it'd be cooler to be a face hugger. I like heels and faces. I just like the guys I enjoy, Edge, Morrison, Kane, Matt Hardy e.t.c.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrestlingfan228 on May 23, 2008 23:30:20 GMT -5
It really depends on the storyline and the superstars involved in the storyline for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by 49% Motherf**ker, 51% SOB on May 24, 2008 14:41:30 GMT -5
I have always preferred heels.
|
|
