dgnr8
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 12, 2006 11:38:01 GMT -5
Posts: 3,914
|
Post by dgnr8 on Apr 8, 2008 19:32:44 GMT -5
I've been praying that WWE will do away with the spinner belt, as I'm sure many of you have. Do you think this could be evidence that HHH will bring back the WWE "Undisputed" style Championship? I find it strange that they would put this on the shirts they gave out to children at THIS year's Wrestlemania, especially seeings as the spinner is so popular amongst young people. Why else would they put THIS title on there unless they plan to bring it back? Who knows? Maybe they just wanted a different graphic and used an old belt? Interesting though...
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Apr 8, 2008 19:34:42 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by ß®å¢K$ßâ¢k on Apr 8, 2008 19:35:58 GMT -5
That obviously isn't the Undisputed title...It's none other than the Reading Challenge Championship...
And I've never gained a fancy towards the Undisputed title...It had no color to it...It was just plain gold. Even the World title has color...The red studds...
|
|
CM Punk
Main Eventer
Bite My Shinny Metal Ass
Joined on: Aug 22, 2007 15:30:12 GMT -5
Posts: 2,553
|
Post by CM Punk on Apr 8, 2008 19:36:36 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense. Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker?
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Apr 8, 2008 19:40:08 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense. Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? Because Undisputed means there is no question who is the "World Champion". ECW basically is a technicality, being the champion would be like being European champion. It's a name more than any thing.
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Apr 8, 2008 19:40:29 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense. Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? To unify the titles......
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Apr 8, 2008 19:47:41 GMT -5
I'm fairly certain he's referring to the actual belt...not the Undisputed moniker.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Apr 8, 2008 19:48:29 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense. Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? You called Undertaker a loser so you have no more rights on WF.
|
|
doink317
Main Eventer
Welcome Back Artie!
Joined on: Aug 22, 2006 16:19:10 GMT -5
Posts: 1,294
|
Post by doink317 on Apr 8, 2008 19:54:04 GMT -5
I'd love for them to bring back that WWE Championship styled belt... I really don't like the spinner belt at all... just seems to gimmicky of a title belt, and I really liked the design on that WWE Championship belt... I remember back when JBL and John Cena were feuding and Cena had the spinner belt, and JBL brought that belt back while feuding with him, and said he was the real WWE champion... now they really need to bring it back for real!
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Apr 8, 2008 19:57:56 GMT -5
Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? You called Undertaker a loser so you have no more rights on WF. Seconded.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Apr 8, 2008 20:02:27 GMT -5
You called Undertaker a loser so you have no more rights on WF. Seconded. Um...thirded. If 3 mods agree on it, it moves up to the Senate, right?
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Apr 8, 2008 20:04:21 GMT -5
Um...thirded. If 3 mods agree on it, it moves up to the Senate, right? Otherwise known as the Admins
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Apr 8, 2008 20:11:15 GMT -5
We can only hope...
|
|
|
Post by Lennon on Apr 8, 2008 20:21:45 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense. Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? You're some idiot over the internet that will never amount to anything.....and HE is the loser?
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Apr 8, 2008 20:26:34 GMT -5
The point is, is that title is the WWE Championship not necessarily the Undisputed Title. The title was used after the WHC was created so there is no reason to just assume that if brought back it will be called the Undisputed Championship belt....IMO they should bring back the Winged Eagle...It has more importance then any other WWE World Title in history
|
|
|
Post by Tim Tebow™ on Apr 8, 2008 20:35:40 GMT -5
I doubt it. He woud have to beat Taker, and then be on both shows. Not going to happen. They probably used it since they weren't using it. If that makes sense. Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? Yes, UNDERTAKER is the loser. By the way, capital letters don't go in the middle of a sentence. How old are you?
|
|
|
Post by kimberlysghost on Apr 8, 2008 20:54:37 GMT -5
Um...thirded. If 3 mods agree on it, it moves up to the Senate, right? 4'd. And I trump all.
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on Apr 8, 2008 20:57:39 GMT -5
Why The Hell Would He Have To beat That Loser undertaker? To unify the titles...... I think he's saying they're going to bring the belt back and use it as Raw's world title. I personally would love to see that happen. The Undisputed Title is one of my favorite belts. I can't wait for them to get rid of that stupid ing spinner belt. I know it doesn't spin anymore, but it's still hideous.
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Apr 8, 2008 21:08:43 GMT -5
i think that shirt is from around WM 20
|
|
great1
Main Eventer
Greatness.
Joined on: Jan 18, 2006 8:07:52 GMT -5
Posts: 3,101
|
Post by great1 on Apr 8, 2008 21:09:36 GMT -5
I certainly hope so but don't forget they also used that design for the "History of the WWE Championship" dvd which was released in late 2006.
|
|