|
Post by Gazza on Mar 13, 2008 19:38:52 GMT -5
Basing the fact if they deserve to be a credible champion is aload of crap. The tallent of them should be the judge if they are, not what they look like or what they have their hair like. Their look dosn't change if they are a good champion or not,
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Mar 13, 2008 19:40:48 GMT -5
The reason his old haired worked because he had a "Rockstar" gimmick. DOes he now? No.
|
|
|
Post by dalethegreat on Mar 13, 2008 19:42:25 GMT -5
Basing the fact if they deserve to be a credible champion is aload of ****. The tallent of them should be the judge if they are, not what they look like or what they have their hair like. Their look dosn't change if they are a good champion or not, i know it should be based more on talent, i'm just saying it how it is mate. do i think it's fair? nope, but what can you do ?
|
|
|
Post by Hervine on Mar 13, 2008 19:43:01 GMT -5
Jericho was much hotter when he had long hair, he's not as sexy now, I see what you guys are saying.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Mar 13, 2008 19:44:20 GMT -5
Basing the fact if they deserve to be a credible champion is aload of ****. The tallent of them should be the judge if they are, not what they look like or what they have their hair like. Their look dosn't change if they are a good champion or not, i know it should be based more on talent, i'm just saying it how it is mate. do i think it's fair? nope, but what can you do ? Thats not "how it is" its just a handfull of people who are just idiots. .
|
|
|
Post by dalethegreat on Mar 13, 2008 19:45:47 GMT -5
i know it should be based more on talent, i'm just saying it how it is mate. do i think it's fair? nope, but what can you do ? Thats not "how it is" its just a handfull of people who are just idiots. . yes it is how it is. why do you think cena had been champion for song long? it's not down to his ability as a wrestler, it's down to his look and how marketable he is to his target audience. $$$
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Mar 13, 2008 19:46:33 GMT -5
It's down to the WWE writers.
And your saying that like Jericho isn't over.
|
|
Get A Rhythm™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 25, 2007 4:17:23 GMT -5
Posts: 2,120
|
Post by Get A Rhythm™ on Mar 13, 2008 19:46:50 GMT -5
Leave.
Now.
|
|
|
Post by dalethegreat on Mar 13, 2008 19:50:22 GMT -5
It's down to the WWE writers. And your saying that like Jericho isn't over. i think the only reason he is over is because he's a well known name from before. if he debut'd recently with the look he has going now then do you think he'd get over?
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Mar 13, 2008 19:52:19 GMT -5
After time with his charcter yeah tbh. Look at Big Vis' he got cheers and that and he didnt exactly have the best look in his PJs did he?
Jericho has a great charcter and great tallent, his hair won't change the fact if the fans boo or cheer him.
When Taker cut his hair did he got boo'd?Only when he was an heel, when he was face he was over.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon on Mar 13, 2008 19:57:31 GMT -5
ok
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Mar 13, 2008 20:01:05 GMT -5
I guess having hair really makes you a mega star, well, except for Austin, but thats was just a one time....and Goldberg, but still, Hair makes the man.....
|
|
BIGticket5
Main Eventer
add me: www.myspace/rostafer_23
Joined on: Jan 26, 2002 20:01:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,745
|
Post by BIGticket5 on Mar 13, 2008 20:05:40 GMT -5
cut HHH's hair or cut the undertakers hair and tell me if it damages his character or not...of course it would, jericho is no diffrent so for all of you who say his hair doesnt play a part, it oviously does....go cut the divas hair to while your at it, i mean, afterall it doesnt matter. taker cut off his hair already and it didn't affect his popularity one bit!
|
|
|
Post by Gussy on Mar 13, 2008 20:11:02 GMT -5
cut HHH's hair or cut the undertakers hair and tell me if it damages his character or not...of course it would, jericho is no diffrent so for all of you who say his hair doesnt play a part, it oviously does....go cut the divas hair to while your at it, i mean, afterall it doesnt matter. taker cut off his hair already and it didn't affect his popularity one bit! cause he was int he american badass gimmick but maybe th eundertaker wasnt the best example, but lets take CM Punk for example and Shawn Michaels, without hair, they would be diffrent.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Mar 13, 2008 21:07:49 GMT -5
He "fell off" because he got stale in like, 2004.
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Mar 13, 2008 21:30:33 GMT -5
taker cut off his hair already and it didn't affect his popularity one bit! cause he was int he american badass gimmick but maybe th eundertaker wasnt the best example, but lets take CM Punk for example and Shawn Michaels, without hair, they would be diffrent. yea but look at when he came back as the deadman at WM20 his hair was still short hea actually looked younger then he does with long hair
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Mar 13, 2008 21:46:52 GMT -5
So that's why Jericho "fell off." Because of his hair!
And all this time I thought it was because the WWE killed his character.
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Mar 13, 2008 22:50:47 GMT -5
Jerichos lack of popularity or how "good" he is has nothing to do with his haircut. In the ring, he's just as good as ever. However, his current ring persona is just unnatural seeming for him. The mature, good guy doesn't work, it's just NOT him. He needs to be an obnoxious, politically incorrect jerk because that's what comes natural for him and what works. I still love watching him wrestle though, his matches are as good as ever.
|
|
Oklahomie
Superstar
Nope.
Joined on: May 6, 2007 11:50:44 GMT -5
Posts: 758
|
Post by Oklahomie on Mar 14, 2008 12:30:08 GMT -5
Spell Check Is There For A Reason.
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Mar 14, 2008 12:59:48 GMT -5
I can see cleeearly now the rain is gone.
|
|