|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Mar 4, 2008 9:40:16 GMT -5
....MITB matches are one of the best parts of WM. I definitely agree and this year's match should be no exception. It should be awesome and I can't wait for it.
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Mar 4, 2008 10:16:57 GMT -5
the last thread says mitb looks amazing. this one says its horrible. youve gotta love the internet
|
|
|
Post by Lennon on Mar 4, 2008 10:33:14 GMT -5
They've all be great matches, so I have no beef with it.
The argument over the IC title is stupid. The title hasn't meant anything in a VERY long time. MITB can't ruin the thing anymore...
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Mar 4, 2008 10:54:03 GMT -5
MITB is always awesome. Can't wait for it!
|
|
|
Post by AndyPeck13 on Mar 4, 2008 11:48:53 GMT -5
the last thread says mitb looks amazing. this one says its horrible. youve gotta love the internet it's called an opinion....
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Mar 4, 2008 12:03:05 GMT -5
Not really sure how you can complain about an 8 Man Ladder Match with 8 top Superstars.
|
|
G A G A
Main Eventer
12 Refs!!
Joined on: May 30, 2007 13:41:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,592
|
Post by G A G A on Mar 4, 2008 14:17:04 GMT -5
screw off go watch tna yo konw the same company that hasnt had a mane even end without a sarve screw jop of 80 million runins in about 2 years yuor spielling is atorcoius
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Mar 4, 2008 14:24:40 GMT -5
It all depends on who's in them.. Putting slow-arses, like Flair, Finlay, Booker, Kane, Orton and Kennedy in, doesn't help the concept much - but with the right people, it can steal the show.. IMO, it should be speedy/athletic/high-flyers, only.. I love how people bitch about this year's match, when there's still three spots to be filled..
|
|
|
Post by spacejam on Mar 4, 2008 14:28:52 GMT -5
I'd rather have MITB then a bunch of title matches that don't mean anything and just on a ppv because its a title match
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Mar 4, 2008 14:38:17 GMT -5
I'd rather have MITB then a bunch of title matches that don't mean anything and just on a ppv because its a title match I'd rather have a bunch of title matches with established angles and storylines involving people actually fighting for the title than a complete cluster spotfest of a ladder match that is really just a place for all the forgotten toys...i mean err...wrestlers.
|
|
Ari Gold
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 16, 2007 20:04:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,346
|
Post by Ari Gold on Mar 4, 2008 14:42:11 GMT -5
MITB is always awesome. Can't wait for it! agreed.
|
|
Leor
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 12, 2007 8:59:45 GMT -5
Posts: 1,474
|
Post by Leor on Mar 4, 2008 15:55:04 GMT -5
i was fine with 6 people the fact that there still continuing with 8 people is stupid...
|
|
WarMachine08
Superstar
Joined on: Jul 9, 2005 12:09:11 GMT -5
Posts: 756
|
Post by WarMachine08 on Mar 4, 2008 17:13:28 GMT -5
I dont mind it. i mean really if it wasn't for MITB, we probably wouldn't be seeing Benjamin or Carlito at WM since they already have plenty of matches. So im perfectly okay with it.
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Mar 4, 2008 18:18:51 GMT -5
I like MITB, it's nice to have another yearly tradition. Just like the Royal Rumble match we only get MITB once a year so it's worth it. They should've made the Elimination Chamber a Survivor Series exclusive as well. Then we would've had 3 matches to look foward to each year.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 21, 2024 3:36:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2008 18:43:29 GMT -5
Its helped and hurt, but IMO its helped more than its hurt True, we'll have a new champion, even if it takes 9 months to do so. As long as they don't get injured before cashing it in and WWE will put the title on someone stale so they won't have to write actually GOOD storylines for a month.
|
|
|
Post by markallenkellner on Mar 4, 2008 18:46:48 GMT -5
They're the highlight of the card.
|
|