|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Oct 11, 2007 15:33:24 GMT -5
I thought this was worth mentioning...maybe it's been brought up before, but I never saw it posted.
Anyway, I just got the new Undertaker/ Batista Wrestlemania 23 2-Pack, and sure enough the Undertaker figure doesn't have his "SARA" tattoo on his neck. Now, it could just be a gigantic coincidence, but I can't remember the last time Jakks forgot his neck tattoo. Hell, they've even put it on some of his figures from eras when he didn't have the tattoo yet.
Meh...just figured I'd throw it out there.
|
|
|
|
Post by catsarefunny on Oct 11, 2007 15:37:59 GMT -5
And another thing, if you check the new WWE magazine(s) all of Taker's pictures have been photoshooped to remove the SARA tattoo?
Coinsidence?
|
|
TXF
Main Eventer
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER Not allowed to trade here.
Joined on: Mar 26, 2005 5:34:36 GMT -5
Posts: 4,159
|
Post by TXF on Oct 11, 2007 15:39:37 GMT -5
yet no one complaines about the fact that 99% of undertakers are incorrect due to lack of tatoos. Notice, his tattoos actually go all the way AROUND his arm. Yet I don't remember a single RA or DA figure of Undertaker, with tattoos that go all the around his arm.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 7:04:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2007 15:41:09 GMT -5
Funny I noticed the tat gone in too.
|
|
WCW-Figure-Fan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 28, 2002 22:38:39 GMT -5
Posts: 2,382
|
Post by WCW-Figure-Fan on Oct 11, 2007 15:45:05 GMT -5
It happened once, and they DID include it on his animated maquette. Maybe it means something, maybe not but its far too early to make even idle speculation.
|
|
RWA
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 12, 2007 16:51:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,305
|
Post by RWA on Oct 11, 2007 15:45:57 GMT -5
I made a thread about thsi ages ago, I thought it would happen
|
|
|
|
Post by class316 on Oct 11, 2007 15:53:18 GMT -5
What absolute CRAP!!! All those CS figures ruined by a Sara tattoo, they remove it for a figure based on a time when he DOES have it!!  |
|
T-Phunk
Main Eventer
T-Phunkamania Runnin' Wild!!!
Joined on: Jun 23, 2004 11:32:19 GMT -5
Posts: 4,265
|
Post by T-Phunk on Oct 11, 2007 16:07:29 GMT -5
Supposedly he has had it removed. I am not sure of the procedure but as I understand the skin is lasered and then the tattoo slowly fades away. Explains why you can still see it as of right now.
|
|
MakaiClub
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 23, 2003 4:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 3,477
|
Post by MakaiClub on Oct 11, 2007 16:22:48 GMT -5
Supposedly he has had it removed. I am not sure of the procedure but as I understand the skin is lasered and then the tattoo slowly fades away. Explains why you can still see it as of right now. Usually tattoo removal works by firing a laser into the ink which heats it up and causes the ink particles to explode. He probably hasn't had procedure done to it yet. |
|
|
|
Post by mrwrestlemania21 on Oct 11, 2007 16:29:31 GMT -5
I'm probably very late in asking this, but has something happened between him and Sara to warrant the removal of his tattoo?
|
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Oct 11, 2007 16:31:03 GMT -5
Weird. Thanks for info.
|
|
|
|
Post by (=wwefan617=) on Oct 11, 2007 17:08:19 GMT -5
i bet they got divorced because there is rumor going around that taker is dating Michelle McCool (i hope i spelled that right lol).
|
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Oct 11, 2007 17:09:56 GMT -5
Some people seem to be a little too worried about Taker's personal life.
|
|
Mastermind
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 6, 2005 14:59:48 GMT -5
Posts: 2,480
|
Post by Mastermind on Oct 11, 2007 18:00:42 GMT -5
i also heard the rumor that he split up with sara..thus the reasoning behind the removal...and i heard that he is dating michelle mccool also
|
|
Lebowski
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 9, 2008 15:05:32 GMT -5
Posts: 765
|
Post by Lebowski on Oct 11, 2007 18:08:37 GMT -5
Some people seem to be a little too worried about Taker's personal life. Yeah i noticed that too. No one cares when a wrestler is doing great, but when they start to have PERSONAL problems, people cant help but jump all over it.. |
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Oct 11, 2007 18:11:05 GMT -5
Jakks probably paid Taker to have it removed so they could save a half of a penny on paint from each Taker fig they make. It would be cheaper to pay Taker than having to put that SARA tattoo on 10 fig a year since they know we're going to buy the figs regardless.
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Oct 11, 2007 18:18:05 GMT -5
Jakks probably paid Taker to have it removed so they could save a half of a penny on paint from each Taker fig they make. It would be cheaper to pay Taker than having to put that SARA tattoo on 10 fig a year since they know we're going to buy the figs regardless. but why would Jakks pay Undertaker to have it removed? I mean..they could put as many or as little tatoos as they feel like. They can give Taker blonde hair and pink tights and it doesn't really matter. |
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Oct 11, 2007 18:38:05 GMT -5
Jakks probably paid Taker to have it removed so they could save a half of a penny on paint from each Taker fig they make. It would be cheaper to pay Taker than having to put that SARA tattoo on 10 fig a year since they know we're going to buy the figs regardless. but why would Jakks pay Undertaker to have it removed? I mean..they could put as many or as little tatoos as they feel like. They can give Taker blonde hair and pink tights and it doesn't really matter. It was a joke. It was a joke on Jakks' cheapness. I expect better from you, T1.  |
|
Lebowski
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 9, 2008 15:05:32 GMT -5
Posts: 765
|
Post by Lebowski on Oct 11, 2007 19:37:09 GMT -5
but why would Jakks pay Undertaker to have it removed? I mean..they could put as many or as little tatoos as they feel like. They can give Taker blonde hair and pink tights and it doesn't really matter. It was a joke. It was a joke on Jakks' cheapness. I expect better from you, T1. I think he was also being sarcastic.. at least i hope he was... |
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Oct 11, 2007 19:48:53 GMT -5
but why would Jakks pay Undertaker to have it removed? I mean..they could put as many or as little tatoos as they feel like. They can give Taker blonde hair and pink tights and it doesn't really matter. It was a joke. It was a joke on Jakks' cheapness. I expect better from you, T1. It actually sounded like something Jakks would do.  which is why I took it seriously.  I wouldn't put anything past Jakks when it comes to saving pennies. |
|
