Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 14:30:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 13:28:32 GMT -5
WWE's direction is no direction. If they had direction, Sting would've won at WrestleMania which makes getting his title shot against Rollins more logical. This really sums up my only irk about this match. Other than that, I'm all for it and I hope the Stinger wins!
|
|
|
Post by AmericanMadeLesGold on Aug 31, 2015 16:58:48 GMT -5
Have Sting lose to a semi-retired HHH and proceed to not fight another match until his world title shot. Makes perfect sense...
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Aug 31, 2015 17:47:59 GMT -5
WWE absolutely has no direction, however they aren't trotting out a senior citizen who can barely walk and expect us to believe he can beat the champion.
This is Sting. He still has plenty of wrestling ability left in him, along with good matches. Sting is a major name in wrestling. Always will be. Him vs Rollins is a big matchup. One that people should want to pay to see. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it in the slightest.
|
|
The IT Factor
Mid-Carder
If you want some, come and get some!
Joined on: May 9, 2013 8:06:28 GMT -5
Posts: 232
|
Post by The IT Factor on Aug 31, 2015 18:00:21 GMT -5
The current direction of WWE sucks.
They've crapped on all of the young stars who should be main eventers, and now all they have left are old stars, and part-timers.
And I get that some people think fans should just "sit back and enjoy the show," but how can we enjoy the show, when the show sucks, outside of the New Day and Brock Lesnar?
I don't care that "it's freaking Sting!" It's bulls*it that in 2015, WWE are still relying on stars from the 90's-early 00's to carry their product.
WWE are making the same mistakes that WCW made. Pushing aside young talent, in favor of older stars and part-timers, and when all those older stars retire, they're f*cked.
|
|
5D's
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 21, 2010 14:05:03 GMT -5
Posts: 753
|
Post by 5D's on Sept 1, 2015 6:19:51 GMT -5
I don't have any problem with Sting; I'm interested in the match precicely BECAUSE he has done virtually nothing since he was signed.
Besides, I have a feeling that if he winds up winning the title he will be destroyed by Sheamus in the near future.
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Sept 1, 2015 9:13:21 GMT -5
I dont get you, you dont think Sting win, but you dont think Rollins is going to gain anything by going over? If Rollins goes over Sting, thats a big step in cementing Rollins career in WWE. I think from an Indy guy's perspective thats cool, WWE are showing willingness to put young guys over Legends, in order to make new stars. You think Rollins is going to go over clean?
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Sept 1, 2015 9:16:27 GMT -5
The current direction of WWE sucks. They've crapped on all of the young stars who should be main eventers, and now all they have left are old stars, and part-timers. And I get that some people think fans should just "sit back and enjoy the show," but how can we enjoy the show, when the show sucks, outside of the New Day and Brock Lesnar? I don't care that "it's freaking Sting!" It's bulls*it that in 2015, WWE are still relying on stars from the 90's-early 00's to carry their product. WWE are making the same mistakes that WCW made. Pushing aside young talent, in favor of older stars and part-timers, and when all those older stars retire, they're f*cked. Could not have said it better.
|
|