|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Aug 29, 2015 10:49:52 GMT -5
Right now, definitely Lesnar. Strong storyline and they've shown the ability to work well together. I don't know how Sting is holding up... The WrestleMania match seemed like he was carried through it by Triple H and lots of smoke and mirrors. Right now I have little to no interest in Sting vs Undertaker, but that may change if the Stinger is on good form against Rollins.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 2:29:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 10:52:39 GMT -5
Where are people getting that Undertaker turned or is turning heel?
Just because of the ball shots? Taker is not a heel.
We won't see him again till Wrestlemania and he damn sure won't be heel there.
|
|
|
Post by kazoosandstreamers on Aug 29, 2015 11:59:26 GMT -5
Rather see him against Sting.
But we will probably get Taker/Lesnar III Followed by Cena/Rock III Followed by Orton/Sheamus IIIVXIIVXXXI
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 2:29:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:35:37 GMT -5
Sting.
I don't want to see Lesnar lose to 'Taker again.
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Aug 29, 2015 16:42:51 GMT -5
Sting, but it's safe to say that match will never happen.
|
|
|
Post by Weemanv1 on Aug 29, 2015 16:44:07 GMT -5
Sting. It's different and could be a huge deal for the WWE while we've already seen Brock/Taker a few times now. That said I'm not against another Taker/Lesnar match either.
|
|
futureisrollins
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 29, 2014 23:02:17 GMT -5
Posts: 239
|
Post by futureisrollins on Aug 29, 2015 17:38:13 GMT -5
I'm betting we'll see Taker vs Lesnar or the fabled Sting match at Survivor Series. He's booked for the Mexico tour and SS is his 25th anniversary so it makes sense
|
|
|
Post by King Richius on Aug 29, 2015 17:50:29 GMT -5
Rather see him against Sting. But we will probably get Taker/Lesnar III Followed by Cena/Rock III Followed by Orton/Sheamus IIIVXIIVXXXII laughed at this far longer and louder than I probably should have. I voted for Sting because I think Brock/Taker should happen at Survivor Series or Royal Rumble.
|
|
|
Post by AmericanMadeLesGold on Aug 29, 2015 18:00:20 GMT -5
I say Sting. Lesnar vs Taker III is only going to make one of them, if not both, look really bad.
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Aug 29, 2015 20:02:18 GMT -5
I'd rather see Sting vs Undertaker.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Aug 30, 2015 10:53:34 GMT -5
I think the more important question is why is the WWE so against doing something that so many of their fans want to pay to see?
|
|
|
Post by GreyHaze:Big Bad Booty Daddy on Aug 30, 2015 15:00:30 GMT -5
I think the more important question is why is the WWE so against doing something that so many of their fans want to pay to see? I agree, Taker vs Sting is the moneymaker. We've seen Taker and Brock about a billion times and honestly the Brock matches take more of a toll than it would be facing Sting. Taker vs Sting could be a cluster for all I care, just the sight of them squaring off is a dream. For me personally, it's the proper send off, then they could focus on the younger talent and I could stop watching wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Aug 30, 2015 15:17:22 GMT -5
Wouldn't it technically be like Lesnar Vs. Taker VIII? Yep. At this point it would be like having Orton vs Cena.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Aug 30, 2015 15:44:47 GMT -5
Lesnar for sure. If a match at Wrestlemania is anything like their Summerslam match then definitely Lesnar. I'd rather not see Taker and Sting lose at Wrestlemania again so that's a wash. If they had a match at the Rumble then I'd be all for it.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Aug 30, 2015 15:54:59 GMT -5
Well, seeing Sting is right there with Piper as my all-time favorite I will always vote Sting.
|
|
Cameron Stone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 16, 2013 18:16:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Aug 30, 2015 16:30:44 GMT -5
Neither.
No need to see Taker vs Lesnar again. And Sting vs Taker in 2015 would be a horrid match. We would have worked in 2007 when Taker was a beast and Sting was still doing consistently decent ring work, but now, no thanks
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Aug 30, 2015 20:51:25 GMT -5
I still can't believe Cena/Taker hasn't really happened (and I'm not counting 2003 when Cena was a mid-carder). That said, there must be a reason.
|
|
Koko B. Rocket
Superstar
WF 15+ Year Member
Joined on: Feb 13, 2005 23:29:52 GMT -5
Posts: 678
|
Post by Koko B. Rocket on Aug 31, 2015 8:19:54 GMT -5
100% Sting. I loved Undertaker and Lesnar's match from SummerSlam, but I never want to see them wrestle again.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Aug 31, 2015 10:07:57 GMT -5
That depends. The Undertaker/Brock Lesnar story needs a conclusion. If the only option is to have that match happen at Wrestlemania, then it should take precedence over Taker/Sting. I think that's the opinion of those in charge as well. Also, Brock needs to win.
If Taker/Lesnar can have a formidable conclusion prior to Wrestlemania, then Taker can do whatever he pleases. To me, once the Taker/Sting match gets off the paper, it's far less intriguing.
Cena/Taker would be at the top of my wishlist at this point, far ahead of Sting.
|
|