Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 5:30:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 11:33:30 GMT -5
No.... He shouldn't. Just so Cena can win it off of him and Rollins become a mid-carder? No Thanks
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Aug 27, 2015 11:56:46 GMT -5
Considering Rollins is looking more and more like the new choice to be the guy going forward, no, I don't think Sting should win. I don't think it would be a travesty. I don't think it would ruin anyone, but I don't think it's at all necessary. It's incredibly clear that WWE does not feel that Sting has the drawing power that the fans think he does. He's a WCW commodity, and in their eyes, WCW is inferior to WWE, and therefore, Sting is not and important name to protect. I would not rule it out, but it won't be a decision made to honor Sting, but rather, something to pop a quick rating now that NFL season is upon us. I just hope the match gets a CLEAN finish. I can see something screwy going down, like HHH getting involved and costing Sting the match. If they go that route, it will do Rollins more damage than good. I actually wouldn't be 100% against HHH getting involved and costing Sting the match. That could result in a Wrestlemania rematch giving us the 1 on 1 we all expected and Sting the big win. Meanwhile, Undertaker could have a strong performance at Hell in a Cell ending both feuds and readying both for a match at Mania 32. They've booked themselves into a corner here and there's no easy way out of it. A Triple H interference would not be a disaster in my opinion though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 5:30:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 12:14:10 GMT -5
I just hope the match gets a CLEAN finish. I can see something screwy going down, like HHH getting involved and costing Sting the match. If they go that route, it will do Rollins more damage than good. I actually wouldn't be 100% against HHH getting involved and costing Sting the match. That could result in a Wrestlemania rematch giving us the 1 on 1 we all expected and Sting the big win. Meanwhile, Undertaker could have a strong performance at Hell in a Cell ending both feuds and readying both for a match at Mania 32. They've booked themselves into a corner here and there's no easy way out of it. A Triple H interference would not be a disaster in my opinion though. I don't see anyway that HHH would lose to Sting. He just isn't going to do it, and even if he wanted to, I doubt Vince would let him.
|
|
|
Post by Shane O. on Aug 27, 2015 12:14:28 GMT -5
As much as I'd love to see it, I highly doubt it'll happen. I haven't enjoyed Rollins title reign very much at all, however I can't deny that a clean win over Sting would do wonders for him.
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on Aug 27, 2015 12:26:27 GMT -5
I think Sting will face Wyatt at Mania. I'd love to see Sting win the title, although after SS Rollins solidified himself as a true great in modern WWE. Dude is absolutely brilliant and plays his role absolutely perfectly. If I met him, I'd think he's exactly as chickencrap as he appears on Raw every week. Guy is fantastic.
|
|
|
Post by Himmy! on Aug 27, 2015 12:46:56 GMT -5
He should have won at Mania in my opinion. Sting is one of my all time favourites and I'm uncomfortable with him beating Rollins. If it was anyone else then maybe a short reign but I really enjoy Rollins as cowardly heel Champion.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Aug 27, 2015 12:54:40 GMT -5
Sting doesn't NEED to win. He's seen it all and pretty much done it all at this stage. However, I would like to see him have the WWE title at least once before he retires. Rollins will win, and honestly? I'm OK with that. Rollins NEEDS the win here, CLEANLY. See, this is the response that I like here. You can be a massive Sting fan and WANT him to win. You obviously would if you like Sting. But you also admit that he doesn't NEED it. I appreicate this post. I agree that he doesn't need the title, but he also doesn't need another high profile loss either.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Aug 27, 2015 12:57:31 GMT -5
No.... He shouldn't. Just so Cena can win it off of him and Rollins become a mid-carder? No Thanks I don't think that Rollins has to worry about becoming a mid-carder anytime soon. But now that you brought it up, I do like the idea of Sting dropping the title to Cena. It's clear that he is going to break Flair's record. Who could be better for that record breaking win than Flair's most famous and noted rival?
|
|
jcjdotcom
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 23, 2005 23:26:04 GMT -5
Posts: 530
|
Post by jcjdotcom on Aug 27, 2015 12:58:35 GMT -5
Sandow absolutely shined in that match and was rewarded with 2 years of crap. Sandow should have won that match or at the very least not be thrown off a cliff. I fully believe the intellectual savior is a gimmick that could last his entire career, with small tweaks as needed to stay relevant of course. On topic, Sting beats Seth. Sheamus cashes in and takes the title. Seth defeats Sheamus clean at the next PPV, showing that he actually can win without assistance from time to time.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 5:30:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 12:58:56 GMT -5
No.... He shouldn't. Just so Cena can win it off of him and Rollins become a mid-carder? No Thanks I don't think that Rollins has to worry about becoming a mid-carder anytime soon. But now that you brought it up, I do like the idea of Sting dropping the title to Cena. It's clear that he is going to break Flair's record. Who could be better for that record breaking win than Flair's most famous and noted rival? I would honestly see that as a Heel turn for Cena if they did that.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Aug 27, 2015 12:59:56 GMT -5
i'd like a three month sting reign. i doubt it'll shake down though - more likely sting will put rollins over. at least we're getting more stinger.
|
|
havoc7179
Main Eventer
What is this?
Joined on: Oct 16, 2012 9:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,189
|
Post by havoc7179 on Aug 27, 2015 13:26:46 GMT -5
I just hope the match gets a CLEAN finish. I can see something screwy going down, like HHH getting involved and costing Sting the match. If they go that route, it will do Rollins more damage than good. I actually wouldn't be 100% against HHH getting involved and costing Sting the match. That could result in a Wrestlemania rematch giving us the 1 on 1 we all expected and Sting the big win. Meanwhile, Undertaker could have a strong performance at Hell in a Cell ending both feuds and readying both for a match at Mania 32. They've booked themselves into a corner here and there's no easy way out of it. A Triple H interference would not be a disaster in my opinion though. In the past 2 years, most of the IWC has said that WWE booked themselves into a corner, yet they keep squirming out of it. They'll be fine. Here are the alleged booked into a corner finishes: 1) Super Seth Rollins beats Cena to retain US Title and Sting to retain WWE WHC Title in one night cleanly or not. At that point WF and IWC turn on him 2) Cena wins back the US Title and Seth retains over Sting. 3) Cena regains US Title and Sting wins his first WWE WHC Title. None of those will happen like that. And, if they do, Rollins looks great in all of them. He faced Super Cena and a living Icon in one night. It's likely my hero Sting won't win. He put over ECIII and others in TNA. I'm sure he has no qualms about putting over the undisputed future, Seth Rollins. If anything, it'll be another DQ finish that leads to a tag match or something where he finally wins. From what I recall, no one in the US cared about the Great Muta being made to look like a fool in WCW during its last days. Why? Because Muta's legacy speaks for itself (or perhaps we don't care about legends?). Same applies with Sting. He could job out to everyone, and people still would receive a rub from him.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Aug 27, 2015 13:33:47 GMT -5
I find it hysterical when people are saying "Seth needs to win and win cleanly" or "Seth's title reign has been book poorly" or "Seth has looked weak as champion". Are we not watching the same programs? Seth has been playing the weaselly heel champion perfectly since winning it at WM. He has been the one must see guy especially since winning the title. Damn near perfection in the role. And yes he should still be champion after NoC. Seth will win, but he doesn't get hurt if it isn't clean.
As for the people complaining if Sting wins saying that in no world is that acceptable/believable. It is just as acceptable/believable as DB beating Triple H, Orton and Batista at WM for the title or people who wanted him to win the RR and go up against and beat Brock at this past WM. That said would it be nice to Sting hold the WWE World Heavywight title? Sure, but I really don't need to see that. I would be much more for it if the titles were still split and he was going up for the World title. But as it is now that isn't needed. I would like to see him have a final run as the US Champion. But I don't see Sting beating Seth for a title.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Aug 27, 2015 13:34:09 GMT -5
I don't think that Rollins has to worry about becoming a mid-carder anytime soon. But now that you brought it up, I do like the idea of Sting dropping the title to Cena. It's clear that he is going to break Flair's record. Who could be better for that record breaking win than Flair's most famous and noted rival? I would honestly see that as a Heel turn for Cena if they did that. That's a good point. It's possible they could avoid Cena getting booed -- more than usual anyway -- if they play their cards right. I think it could work if they build it like they built Warrior vs Hogan. It is possible to have two faces in a high profile match but booking it will be difficult.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Aug 27, 2015 13:50:46 GMT -5
If Lex Luger couldn't be WWE World Champion in his prime then no way should Sting be WWE World Champion in his 50s.
I want Seth Rollins to win, and keep beating these legends, main event stars, and surpass CM Punk's reign a few years ago as longest WWE Champion in recent history.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Aug 27, 2015 13:58:46 GMT -5
Even though I want Seth to win id be OK with sting tho i could see sting winning then triple h sends sheamus out to cash in and he wins cause as triple h says there is always a plan b and plan b would be sheamus cashing in then triple h says Seth disappointed him and let him down and thats how we end up with hhh/Rollins with sheamus thrown in cause Seth will still need to get his rematch as well as sting and triple h could tie into that with him beating sting at mania
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 5:30:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 14:01:18 GMT -5
I would honestly see that as a Heel turn for Cena if they did that. That's a good point. It's possible they could avoid Cena getting booed -- more than usual anyway -- if they play their cards right. I think it could work if they build it like they built Warrior vs Hogan. It is possible to have two faces in a high profile match but booking it will be difficult. They don't have the writers to book it like that anymore. They'll jump the gun and ruin it, unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by The Champ is Here! on Aug 27, 2015 14:33:00 GMT -5
Who says Sting can't have a full run with the title for a few months? I say I would really, really rather it not happen. To each their own but it would be an easily skipable couple months while Sting is champ. Ive skipped raw since mania, if sting was champ, i'd tune in
|
|
jacktunney
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 3, 2012 22:50:33 GMT -5
Posts: 725
|
Post by jacktunney on Aug 27, 2015 14:40:15 GMT -5
Is it ok to not worry or really care about who could/should win and nitpick to a ridiculous degree? I am just looking forward to a cool, unique matchup that should be fun to watch play out. How do most of you even enjoy watching wrestling with all the over analyzing
|
|
|
Post by Yayo on Aug 27, 2015 15:14:20 GMT -5
Sting really needs to lose at NOC
|
|