Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 11:23:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2015 13:41:49 GMT -5
I thought this show was going to be mess. Just like I did with WM 30. WM 30 was just purely awesome. This year was real good as well. The only match that didn't really float my boat was Reigns and Lesnar. But I like the match because of it's outcome. Russev and Cena had massive improvement from their previous match. I'd never put it in my top 5. It would be in top 10.
|
|
|
Post by Roman Bellic on Apr 1, 2015 15:46:00 GMT -5
sunked like a turd in the toilet
11/10, that's how bad it was
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 11:23:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2015 15:50:49 GMT -5
It wasn't better than 24. 24 may be my favorite.
I also really enjoyed 28, 18, and 19.
I don't think 17 is the greatest ever and I think 30 is very overrated. I also really like WM 6.
31 is probably in my top 5.
If Sting would've won it'd easily be number 2.
Edit: Way way too many finishers kicked out of. That's 100% lost it's luster. Fans don't even believe it's over until the second one.
For example: Taker kicked out of two F-5's at WM XXX. One F-5 beat Rollins at the Rumble. Reigns took how many?
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Apr 1, 2015 15:54:13 GMT -5
Definitely top five, not sure where though.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Apr 1, 2015 19:31:21 GMT -5
Probably in the top 10-15 range.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Apr 1, 2015 20:15:55 GMT -5
Top five easily, maybe even top three. sunked like a turd in the toilet 11/10, that's how bad it was Wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Roman Bellic on Apr 1, 2015 20:54:01 GMT -5
Top five easily, maybe even top three. sunked like a turd in the toilet 11/10, that's how bad it was Wrong. mind explaining why it's wrong?
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Apr 1, 2015 21:41:06 GMT -5
Top five easily, maybe even top three. Wrong. mind explaining why it's wrong? To call Wrestlemania 31 average is one thing, calling it bad is another but your rating was just a trolling level of wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Hendrix83 on Apr 1, 2015 22:00:11 GMT -5
It was a solid show based on the lowered expectations we had going into it.
But in the scheme of things it won't stand the test of time like a WM 3 or WM 17.
|
|
|
Post by Roman Bellic on Apr 1, 2015 22:08:40 GMT -5
mind explaining why it's wrong? To call Wrestlemania 31 average is one thing, calling it bad is another but your rating was just a trolling level of wrong. it's subjective, you got a problem with my opinion? Brock vs Reigns was Brock vs Goldberg reskinned (though Seth saved the show, and Reigns lost) Cena buries yet another rising star Sting losing against HHH
|
|
|
Post by cripplercrossface on Apr 1, 2015 22:21:51 GMT -5
I'm ranking my top 10: 17 19 21 24 20 3 6 18 10 13
So, no 31 doesn't rank in my top 10. I thought it was good, but not a favorite of mine.
|
|
|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on Apr 1, 2015 23:31:44 GMT -5
In the top 5 no doubt considering how little build up there was for majority of the matches
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 11:23:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2015 10:55:40 GMT -5
I liked it fine but it would definitely be higher in my estimations if Sting had won.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Apr 2, 2015 11:11:27 GMT -5
Urgh reading these posts are ridiculous. It was solid but not great. Just because Seth walked out as champ doesn't make it the best ever. I'd say in the top half of wms but not in my top 5 and possibly not too 10.
|
|