Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2015 22:41:07 GMT -5
I wasn't too thrilled with the Rumble either but wouldn't be cancelling my sub to the Network over it. I am enjoying the classic content WAY too much at the moment. Oh boy that classic content! You're paying in 2015 for what was free 10-30 years ago! It's still free today, you just gotta know where to look. That's why I don't have the network
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Feb 26, 2015 23:17:35 GMT -5
I wasn't too thrilled with the Rumble either but wouldn't be cancelling my sub to the Network over it. I am enjoying the classic content WAY too much at the moment. Oh boy that classic content! You're paying in 2015 for what was free 10-30 years ago! Maybe to him, he $9.99 a month for classic stuff is worth it. People paid nearly that much for the Classics On Demand program. If it's a good investment to him then so be it. If it's not to you then fine. I've enjoyed the WWE Network and have no plans of cancelling. You seem to enjoy any negativity that comes to the WWE, and I hope that's worth it for you. I, for one, am going to keep enjoying as much of the Network as I can.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Feb 26, 2015 23:39:45 GMT -5
If it wasn't for NXT. My subscription would've been long gone.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 0:42:33 GMT -5
Oh boy that classic content! You're paying in 2015 for what was free 10-30 years ago! Maybe to him, he $9.99 a month for classic stuff is worth it. People paid nearly that much for the Classics On Demand program. If it's a good investment to him then so be it. If it's not to you then fine. I've enjoyed the WWE Network and have no plans of cancelling. You seem to enjoy any negativity that comes to the WWE, and I hope that's worth it for you. I, for one, am going to keep enjoying as much of the Network as I can. This. All of it.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Feb 27, 2015 3:30:04 GMT -5
That's Bc wrestling fans have become so "smart" along with social media bull crap that no one can just sit back and watch the show unfold without someone getting there panties in a bunch. Omgz roman won we shall kill the empire! It's a show Let it be written the way it's suppose to be for Christ sakes. I miss the old days where fans didn't have a social media outlet to complain or didn't uproar shows at live TV events and be so rude to the performers Those 200k people are idiots and should be sad to call themselves fans bc If your such a fan you wouldn't do something like that. Your suppose to stick through the bad and good and I'm sure 85% of those people tuned into raw the next night to watch. F'ing hypocrites I swear! I will never understand this argument. Who are you to tell anyone what they should or should not do with their money? If you are financially supporting a company -- any company -- and you no longer like what they are doing, why would you continue to give them your money? People like you have ruined wrestling for me (and MANY, MANY others). You swallow all the crap the WWE shovels into your mouth and condemn anyone who speaks out against something they don't care for. If they don't like it, why should they buy it? Oh, and by the way, "the way the show is supposed to be written" is the way that stay piss off a metric -ton of their audience.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 5:49:16 GMT -5
Imagine being one of those lame unsubsribers. You're so passionate about the business and the on screen decisions that you boycott the network and turn your back on the product.
Then what..?
Re-subscribe next week, that's what. Are the rest of us supposed to commend these so called 'fans' for cutting off their nose to spite their face? I guess theyve just got soooo much going in in their lives that they can't forgive one below-par PPV!
Oh, turns out that 200k figure was wildly exaggerated and doesn't actually reflect any of the lame Twitter campaigns. What a surprise.
That'll learn that WWE! They shouldn't mess with that kid in his mothers basement!
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Feb 27, 2015 6:05:41 GMT -5
That's Bc wrestling fans have become so "smart" along with social media bull crap that no one can just sit back and watch the show unfold without someone getting there panties in a bunch. Omgz roman won we shall kill the empire! It's a show Let it be written the way it's suppose to be for Christ sakes. I miss the old days where fans didn't have a social media outlet to complain or didn't uproar shows at live TV events and be so rude to the performers Those 200k people are idiots and should be sad to call themselves fans bc If your such a fan you wouldn't do something like that. Your suppose to stick through the bad and good and I'm sure 85% of those people tuned into raw the next night to watch. F'ing hypocrites I swear! People like you have ruined wrestling for me (and MANY, MANY others). You swallow all the crap the WWE shovels into your mouth and condemn anyone who speaks out against something they don't care for. If they don't like it, why should they buy it? Not really. It just means some people won't instantly dismiss the WWE when someone they like loses. I didn't like the way the Rumble was booked (the winner was fine though) but I chose not to cancel my subscription to the Network. It doesn't mean I'm 'swallowing crap' so to speak, it just means I choose to keep watching to see how it develops. Take the latest AC/DC album Rock Or Bust for example. I'm not that big a fan of the song 'Miss Adventure' but I'm not going to condemn them straight away because of that one thing. I will keep buying their music, merch and concert tickets. The lack of six month commitment has really allowed these sort of people to show through. The ones that will complain and unsubscribe in February and resubscribe in March. The type of person that supports a team when they're winning and abandons them after a loss.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 6:11:58 GMT -5
That's Bc wrestling fans have become so "smart" along with social media bull crap that no one can just sit back and watch the show unfold without someone getting there panties in a bunch. Omgz roman won we shall kill the empire! It's a show Let it be written the way it's suppose to be for Christ sakes. I miss the old days where fans didn't have a social media outlet to complain or didn't uproar shows at live TV events and be so rude to the performers Those 200k people are idiots and should be sad to call themselves fans bc If your such a fan you wouldn't do something like that. Your suppose to stick through the bad and good and I'm sure 85% of those people tuned into raw the next night to watch. F'ing hypocrites I swear! I will never understand this argument. Who are you to tell anyone what they should or should not do with their money? If you are financially supporting a company -- any company -- and you no longer like what they are doing, why would you continue to give them your money? People like you have ruined wrestling for me (and MANY, MANY others). You swallow all the crap the WWE shovels into your mouth and condemn anyone who speaks out against something they don't care for. If they don't like it, why should they buy it? Oh, and by the way, "the way the show is supposed to be written" is the way that stay piss off a metric -ton of their audience. This is exactly what I mean. Whats funny is that people gave less of a crap about what "WWE fed them" before the Network come along. Now WWE are the bad guys for putting out a questionable product on free TV and charging 9.99 for their network of on-demand. Like we are all supposed to conveniently forget that the current product (which sucks) is still on FREE TV. And the on-demand/NXT product (which is awesome) is 9.99 on the network... People dislike the current product and lust for an alternative, so they choose not to buy the network? If that's really the case, common sense gained a chromosome. Before the Network come along, people would be boycotting the current product and spending hours watching the older product instead, or TNA/Japan if they were really that bothered. Now people boycott the company as a whole due to their discontent towards booking decisions. And we are supposed to believe that Roman Reigns winning the royal rumble has actually ruined wrestling (new and old) for anyone? What crap. People are just bitter that WWE make money from their superior on demand, and the people willing to boycott the network are probably downloading a crap ton of attitude era WWF via a torrent site instead. Like it makes any difference! They may not pay to watch it now, but let's see what happens if Stone Cold makes a comeback. Let's see how long those Network boycotters stay at "that side of the fence". Next month WWE will release record high subscription figures following WrestleMania. And for some reason, that will really boil people's blood..? Basically, the IWC feel that WWEs newest business model should collapse as a global public trading industry simply because Daniel Bryan isn't in the main event and champion of everything. The IWC feel WWE should fail in the market because the guy they wanted to see pushed in 12 months time, 12 months ago, got pushed 12 months later. If you really think that rebellious minority of fans would even dent the WWEs financial figures, YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL MORON. And should go play more sport.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 6:27:30 GMT -5
And god damn, the amount of people in this thread who are clearly angling opinion from the side against WWE Network. Who the hell do you think you're fooling?!
If you're on this board, chances are you are a paying subscriber, and if you're not, you're likely to quote me any minute now and point this out to show everyone how much of a cool, alternative and cultured a wrestling fan you truely are.
...before I unknowingly bump into you online on WWE2k15.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 6:34:30 GMT -5
I wasn't too thrilled with the Rumble either but wouldn't be cancelling my sub to the Network over it. I am enjoying the classic content WAY too much at the moment. Oh boy that classic content! You're paying in 2015 for what was free 10-30 years ago! Well I enjoy the classic content-and couldn't give one plastic f*ck about the modern stuff on there aside from NXT so yeah......"oh boy that classic content"..... If people having the network annoys you? I recommend a change in lifestyle immediately.....as in today. It isn't healthy to be irritated by what others like so much
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 6:37:52 GMT -5
Oh boy that classic content! You're paying in 2015 for what was free 10-30 years ago! Well I enjoy the classic content-and couldn't give one plastic f*ck about the modern stuff on there aside from NXT so yeah......"oh boy that classic content"..... If people having the network annoys you? I recommend a change in lifestyle immediately.....as in today. It isn't healthy to be irritated by what others like so much Oh boy oh boy oh boy that CLASSIC CONTENT!!! Free 30 years ago, granted, but up until the network came along, you're paying at least £20 for a DVD or lofting through tons of unseeded torrents of poor quality footage. Absolute no brainer. I agree with Joker, a new hobby is pretty much reccomended.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 0:01:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2015 6:45:34 GMT -5
I cancelled the Network before the Rumble because I only like to subscribe for single months and see how the next PPV goes before spending $10 which I could just as easily use on something else. It's not to spite WWE, I still enjoy the product largely, but I don't always need a subscription given NXT is on Pay TV in Australia, as is basically all current WWE shows. I'd only watch it for the PPVs which I never get to watch live so I don't have as much interest in, and the classic stuff which I can't make time for anyway.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Feb 27, 2015 7:50:32 GMT -5
Oh boy that classic content! You're paying in 2015 for what was free 10-30 years ago! Maybe to him, he $9.99 a month for classic stuff is worth it. People paid nearly that much for the Classics On Demand program. If it's a good investment to him then so be it. If it's not to you then fine. I've enjoyed the WWE Network and have no plans of cancelling. You seem to enjoy any negativity that comes to the WWE, and I hope that's worth it for you. I, for one, am going to keep enjoying as much of the Network as I can. Exactly I was paying slightly more a month for wwe 24/7 plus $60 for WrestleMania every year. Now I pay the $9.99 a month and get all the PPV's included if I choose to watch them. (Which I have watched every one of) and get to watch and of the content whenever I want not just the month they offered it on 24/7. I think it's easily worth it for that.
|
|
|
Post by Andrewghbk99 on Feb 27, 2015 8:29:27 GMT -5
That's Bc wrestling fans have become so "smart" along with social media bull crap that no one can just sit back and watch the show unfold without someone getting there panties in a bunch. Omgz roman won we shall kill the empire! It's a show Let it be written the way it's suppose to be for Christ sakes. I miss the old days where fans didn't have a social media outlet to complain or didn't uproar shows at live TV events and be so rude to the performers Those 200k people are idiots and should be sad to call themselves fans bc If your such a fan you wouldn't do something like that. Your suppose to stick through the bad and good and I'm sure 85% of those people tuned into raw the next night to watch. F'ing hypocrites I swear! I will never understand this argument. Who are you to tell anyone what they should or should not do with their money? If you are financially supporting a company -- any company -- and you no longer like what they are doing, why would you continue to give them your money? People like you have ruined wrestling for me (and MANY, MANY others). You swallow all the crap the WWE shovels into your mouth and condemn anyone who speaks out against something they don't care for. If they don't like it, why should they buy it? Oh, and by the way, "the way the show is supposed to be written" is the way that stay piss off a metric -ton of their audience. What the iwc? The smart fan? It's people like you that nit pick at everything. It's a show and how it's written is their desicion and shouldn't be changed bc of whinny fans. You don't see TV shows and movies being changed and stories being changed bc fans that follow that series didn't like what happened. Just let it flow.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 27, 2015 9:32:07 GMT -5
One thing I don't understand is why the disenchanted "fans" have to talk down to those that actually enjoy it. They talk down to those that love the network. They talk down to those that do not want to jump ship over a predetermined outcome. Just because you may not like an outcome does not mean you have to hate on everything. Why do you care that others are enjoying it? If I stopped watching wrestling the first time I didn't agree with an outcome I would have stopped watching within a month.
It's kinda sad really, that a wrestling fan can't be on a wrestling forum without being told they swallow crap by the high and mighty (so called) fans. We are here because we either enjoy WWE. You are here to constantly cry and complain about anything/everything you can. So which sounds more productive?
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Feb 27, 2015 10:57:24 GMT -5
People like you have ruined wrestling for me (and MANY, MANY others). You swallow all the crap the WWE shovels into your mouth and condemn anyone who speaks out against something they don't care for. If they don't like it, why should they buy it? Not really. It just means some people won't instantly dismiss the WWE when someone they like loses. I didn't like the way the Rumble was booked (the winner was fine though) but I chose not to cancel my subscription to the Network. It doesn't mean I'm 'swallowing crap' so to speak, it just means I choose to keep watching to see how it develops. Take the latest AC/DC album Rock Or Bust for example. I'm not that big a fan of the song 'Miss Adventure' but I'm not going to condemn them straight away because of that one thing. I will keep buying their music, merch and concert tickets. The lack of six month commitment has really allowed these sort of people to show through. The ones that will complain and unsubscribe in February and resubscribe in March. The type of person that supports a team when they're winning and abandons them after a loss. This is exactly what I'm taking about. Compete misdirection. Nearly every post I've seen on the subject are people complaining about the overall product as a whole, but the WWE diehards always boil it down to one loss or fumbled push. You change the narrative to something that it was never meant to be and respond to that. Did I mention any one wrestler our match? No, but that's where you took the conversation. It happens literally every time I try to talk about this here. Do I like Daniel Bryan? Do I like Reigns? Not really. But this situation isn't enough to stop liking the product. What the WWE had been putting on TV for years had been bad television. It's unwatchable. That's my problem. I've been a wrestling fan for 28 of my 30 years. I've seen many guys get passed over. I've seen guys who would have been fantastic main eventers never get their shot. I don't know how to make this any more clear to you people: THIS. ISN'T. ABOUT. DANIEL. BRYAN.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Charisma on Feb 27, 2015 11:00:28 GMT -5
Take the latest AC/DC album Rock Or Bust for example. I'm not that big a fan of the song 'Miss Adventure' but I'm not going to condemn them straight away because of that one thing. Damn, that's like my second fave off the record after "Dogs of War"
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 27, 2015 11:04:08 GMT -5
Not really. It just means some people won't instantly dismiss the WWE when someone they like loses. I didn't like the way the Rumble was booked (the winner was fine though) but I chose not to cancel my subscription to the Network. It doesn't mean I'm 'swallowing crap' so to speak, it just means I choose to keep watching to see how it develops. Take the latest AC/DC album Rock Or Bust for example. I'm not that big a fan of the song 'Miss Adventure' but I'm not going to condemn them straight away because of that one thing. I will keep buying their music, merch and concert tickets. The lack of six month commitment has really allowed these sort of people to show through. The ones that will complain and unsubscribe in February and resubscribe in March. The type of person that supports a team when they're winning and abandons them after a loss. This is exactly what I'm taking about. Compete misdirection. Nearly every post I've seen on the subject are people complaining about the overall product as a whole, but the WWE diehards always boil it down to one loss or fumbled push. You change the narrative to something that it was never meant to be and respond to that. Did I mention any one wrestler our match? No, but that's where you took the conversation. It happens literally every time I try to talk about this here. Do I like Daniel Bryan? Do I like Reigns? Not really. But this situation isn't enough to stop liking the product. What the WWE had been putting on TV for years had been bad television. It's unwatchable. That's my problem. I've been a wrestling fan for 28 of my 30 years. I've seen many guys get passed over. I've seen guys who would have been fantastic main eventers never get their shot. I don't know how to make this any more clear to you people: THIS. ISN'T. ABOUT. DANIEL. BRYAN. That's debatable.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Feb 27, 2015 11:12:38 GMT -5
One thing I don't understand is why the disenchanted "fans" have to talk down to those that actually enjoy it. They talk down to those that love the network. They talk down to those that do not want to jump ship over a predetermined outcome. Just because you may not like an outcome does not mean you have to hate on everything. Why do you care that others are enjoying it? If I stopped watching wrestling the first time I didn't agree with an outcome I would have stopped watching within a month. It's kinda sad really, that a wrestling fan can't be on a wrestling forum without being told they swallow crap by the high and mighty (so called) fans. We are here because we either enjoy WWE. You are here to constantly cry and complain about anything/everything you can. So which sounds more productive? I agree with this completely, but also feel it impacts both sides. While a lot of people who hate the product enjoy talking down to those who do enjoy it, I've also seen TONS of situations where people who love the product talk down to people who dislike it. It's unfortunate that people can't just debate stuff.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Feb 27, 2015 11:15:15 GMT -5
I will never understand this argument. Who are you to tell anyone what they should or should not do with their money? If you are financially supporting a company -- any company -- and you no longer like what they are doing, why would you continue to give them your money? People like you have ruined wrestling for me (and MANY, MANY others). You swallow all the crap the WWE shovels into your mouth and condemn anyone who speaks out against something they don't care for. If they don't like it, why should they buy it? Oh, and by the way, "the way the show is supposed to be written" is the way that stay piss off a metric -ton of their audience. This is exactly what I mean. Whats funny is that people gave less of a crap about what "WWE fed them" before the Network come along. Now WWE are the bad guys for putting out a questionable product on free TV and charging 9.99 for their network of on-demand. Like we are all supposed to conveniently forget that the current product (which sucks) is still on FREE TV. And the on-demand/NXT product (which is awesome) is 9.99 on the network... People dislike the current product and lust for an alternative, so they choose not to buy the network? If that's really the case, common sense gained a chromosome. Before the Network come along, people would be boycotting the current product and spending hours watching the older product instead, or TNA/Japan if they were really that bothered. Now people boycott the company as a whole due to their discontent towards booking decisions. And we are supposed to believe that Roman Reigns winning the royal rumble has actually ruined wrestling (new and old) for anyone? What crap. People are just bitter that WWE make money from their superior on demand, and the people willing to boycott the network are probably downloading a crap ton of attitude era WWF via a torrent site instead. Like it makes any difference! They may not pay to watch it now, but let's see what happens if Stone Cold makes a comeback. Let's see how long those Network boycotters stay at "that side of the fence". Next month WWE will release record high subscription figures following WrestleMania. And for some reason, that will really boil people's blood..? Basically, the IWC feel that WWEs newest business model should collapse as a global public trading industry simply because Daniel Bryan isn't in the main event and champion of everything. The IWC feel WWE should fail in the market because the guy they wanted to see pushed in 12 months time, 12 months ago, got pushed 12 months later. If you really think that rebellious minority of fans would even dent the WWEs financial figures, YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL MORON. And should go play more sport. ...What? Did you just get the internet yesterday? If you honestly believe that no one complained about wrestling until the Network came along then you need your head examined because you are seriously delusional. Did I once say anything about canceling the Network? I don't care what your or anyone else with their money. It's none of my business. I don't care. What I do care about is being told that I am wrong it "not a real fan" because I dislike the current product. That's been my only complaint, other than not liking WWE right now. I've never once supported this cancel the Network movement because it isn't going to do anything. However, just like I don't care about what anyone does with their money, none of you should care about what anyone what does their money. If someone didn't like the WWE, they are not wrong for not wanting to give them $10 a month. And despite what many of you want to think, the success of the Network is seen by those in the company as a reflection of the fan's feeling of the current product. No one, I repeat, NO ONE is angry that the WWE is making money. I'm not really sure what you meant by that. It's one of many statements you made the made absolutely no sense. The majority of the post was unintelligible. This isn't about hurting WWE's financial figures. No one is doing that. No one has said that. No one is talking about that, except for the WWE diehards. I already explained that in an earlier post. You people make crap up and then get angry about it. And dude, seriously, I wouldn't be calling anyone a delusional moron if I was you.
|
|