|
Post by Midnight on Feb 26, 2015 9:17:30 GMT -5
I feel that a PPV is more special if it has its own stage. Damn budget cuts and laziness by WWE.
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Feb 27, 2015 17:20:13 GMT -5
I feel that a PPV is more special if it has its own stage. Damn budget cuts and laziness by WWE.
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Feb 27, 2015 19:09:26 GMT -5
One of the last cool stages I saw was Over the Limit.
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Feb 28, 2015 1:40:22 GMT -5
lol I guess for $9.99 it isn't worth WWE's effort to make a stage for you. I hear ya, I think it's extremely lazy.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Feb 28, 2015 1:41:16 GMT -5
lol I guess for $9.99 it isn't worth WWE's effort to make a stage for you. I hear ya, I think it's extremely lazy. Or cost cutting...
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Feb 28, 2015 1:45:09 GMT -5
lol I guess for $9.99 it isn't worth WWE's effort to make a stage for you. I hear ya, I think it's extremely lazy. Or cost cutting... You can call it whatever you want. I'll call it laziness. If WWE wanted to cut costs they wouldn't be paying $10 Million for Lesnar to wrestle 4 times a year.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Feb 28, 2015 1:58:35 GMT -5
You can call it whatever you want. I'll call it laziness. If WWE wanted to cut costs they wouldn't be paying $10 Million for Lesnar to wrestle 4 times a year. The amount of people wanting to see Lesnar wrestling is a hell of a lot higher than those that want different stages. Common sense really.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 23:37:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Stage's?
Feb 28, 2015 2:05:43 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2015 2:05:43 GMT -5
You can call it whatever you want. I'll call it laziness. If WWE wanted to cut costs they wouldn't be paying $10 Million for Lesnar to wrestle 4 times a year. The amount of people wanting to see Lesnar wrestling is a hell of a lot higher than those that want different stages. Common sense really. Yep. Couldn't care less about the stage. I'll take Brock all day though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 23:37:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Stage's?
Feb 28, 2015 2:06:05 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2015 2:06:05 GMT -5
You can call it whatever you want. I'll call it laziness. If WWE wanted to cut costs they wouldn't be paying $10 Million for Lesnar to wrestle 4 times a year. It's literally called cost cutting.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 28, 2015 2:17:56 GMT -5
I miss the unique stages, but it isn't a huge deal and a bit nitpicky tbh. In trying to be cost efficient, it doens't add much to the product, might as well cut it out. I personally wish they would go to a smaller setup (perhaps even using it for TV, but the current HD setup for PPVs to establish a bit more difference?). The current setup is just too big for every week if you ask me. I'm not saying go back to the RAW letters or neon entrance way, but the pre-HD stages were the perfect size. Not too big, not too small, imo.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 23:37:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Stage's?
Mar 1, 2015 1:03:47 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2015 1:03:47 GMT -5
WWE's stages used to be incredible, but I'm not too bothered over this. Some of my favourites were.. No Way Out 2009 HIAC 2009 Armageddon (all of them) Survivor Series 2003 Summerslam 2007 Royal Rumble 2004
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Mar 1, 2015 2:13:29 GMT -5
It's all because they are HD. I wish each PPV had its own design. It would give each show its own identity, but they all just blend together
|
|