Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 11:54:56 GMT -5
Heel vs. Heel won't work but Lesnar vs. Orton is a fresh new match so I'm down. guessing Orton might turn face? Seems a bit to soon, it'd be the only way tho
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 11:56:47 GMT -5
Heel vs. Heel won't work but Lesnar vs. Orton is a fresh new match so I'm down. guessing Orton might turn face? Seems a bit to soon, it'd be the only way tho Yeah I'd imagine. I thought they were teasing it a few weeks ago when he and Kane were getting sick of doing Rollins' dirty work. It kinda went nowhere and got dropped though.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,253
|
Post by hbkowns on Oct 21, 2014 11:58:45 GMT -5
Well when Cena beats Orton then I see Orton feuding with Rollins. Which leaves Ambrose lost in the shuffle..
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 12:00:23 GMT -5
Here's what I think should happen: Cena loses at HIAC. Bada Boom. I'm assuming after HIAC, Rollins and Ambrose will be done. Even though I'd like for them to have one more match at TLC, I feel like it is. Seth v. Randy will be a future championship match. The question will be, will Seth, and Dean involve themselves during Lesnar v. Orton (when it happens, hopefully at Survivor Series, and as a stipulation match) in order to have Randy pin Lesnar and win the title? This could lead into Randy v. Seth v. Dean for the title. I wouldn't mind that at all. I was all for Lesnar winning the title from Cena, but with Lesnar defeating Undertaker, this elevates the chances of Lesnar losing cleanly very, very high. So, I'm hoping there will be some interference with Seth, Dean, or both. Now, how would Ambrose and Rollins be involved? At Survivor Series, Orton is facing Lesnar, Seth interferes attacking Orton. Brock joins in on the beatdown towards Orton. Then, Ambrose's theme hits to save Orton. Ambrose cleans house, hitting Dirty Deeds on both Seth, and Lesnar (maybe throw a couple kendo/chair shots in the mix), allowing Orton to pin Lesnar for the title. The next night on Raw, Orton is involved in a tag match with Ambrose facing Seth and Kane. As the match goes on, Orton and Ambrose pull victory. Triple H and Stephanie walk down to the ring distracting Orton, and Ambrose, while Kane and Seth take advantage and beat down the two. Seth then cashes in on Orton, making Seth the new WWE champion. Then, connecting all of the dots, the next Monday, Orton orders his rematch clause to take place at TLC. Dean Ambrose interrupts Orton demanding to be put in the TLC match with him and Rollins. Ambrose would say that without him, Orton wouldn't have been champion at all. There's my two cents. Not the best, but I think it would be interesting to say the least. Not sure where Brock or Cena would fit in the mix, but I honestly could care less about those two. I know I should've added Lesnar's rematch clause, but I didn't. Decent idea, but destroys Lesnar's credibility, which while you COULDN'T care less, is kind of the reason they're pushing his reign so hard. Lesnar should not lose via cash-in, it would be a huge mistake, as would losing with an interference. If Lesnar is going to lose, have Reigns/Ambrose/Rollins do it clean and get them over. If you want to build new stars, there are plenty of ways to do it, and beating Lesnar clean would be, by far, the best way to do it right now.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Oct 21, 2014 12:12:59 GMT -5
Here's what I think should happen: Cena loses at HIAC. Bada Boom. I'm assuming after HIAC, Rollins and Ambrose will be done. Even though I'd like for them to have one more match at TLC, I feel like it is. Seth v. Randy will be a future championship match. The question will be, will Seth, and Dean involve themselves during Lesnar v. Orton (when it happens, hopefully at Survivor Series, and as a stipulation match) in order to have Randy pin Lesnar and win the title? This could lead into Randy v. Seth v. Dean for the title. I wouldn't mind that at all. I was all for Lesnar winning the title from Cena, but with Lesnar defeating Undertaker, this elevates the chances of Lesnar losing cleanly very, very high. So, I'm hoping there will be some interference with Seth, Dean, or both. Now, how would Ambrose and Rollins be involved? At Survivor Series, Orton is facing Lesnar, Seth interferes attacking Orton. Brock joins in on the beatdown towards Orton. Then, Ambrose's theme hits to save Orton. Ambrose cleans house, hitting Dirty Deeds on both Seth, and Lesnar (maybe throw a couple kendo/chair shots in the mix), allowing Orton to pin Lesnar for the title. The next night on Raw, Orton is involved in a tag match with Ambrose facing Seth and Kane. As the match goes on, Orton and Ambrose pull victory. Triple H and Stephanie walk down to the ring distracting Orton, and Ambrose, while Kane and Seth take advantage and beat down the two. Seth then cashes in on Orton, making Seth the new WWE champion. Then, connecting all of the dots, the next Monday, Orton orders his rematch clause to take place at TLC. Dean Ambrose interrupts Orton demanding to be put in the TLC match with him and Rollins. Ambrose would say that without him, Orton wouldn't have been champion at all. There's my two cents. Not the best, but I think it would be interesting to say the least. Not sure where Brock or Cena would fit in the mix, but I honestly could care less about those two. I know I should've added Lesnar's rematch clause, but I didn't. Decent idea, but destroys Lesnar's credibility, which while you COULDN'T care less, is kind of the reason they're pushing his reign so hard. Lesnar should not lose via cash-in, it would be a huge mistake, as would losing with an interference. If Lesnar is going to lose, have Reigns/Ambrose/Rollins do it clean and get them over. If you want to build new stars, there are plenty of ways to do it, and beating Lesnar clean would be, by far, the best way to do it right now. Well, by your idea, WWE's only logic would be to have Reigns go over, but Reigns is injured right now. Lesnar's defeated Undertaker, and Cena twice. His standards are set very, very high. There's no way in my mind that neither Rollins or Ambrose can go over Lesnar clean. There's just not a way of convincing me that right now. If Lesnar is 'knocked out' from the curb stomp at Survivor Series, and Rollins wins via cash in, this sets up Rollins v. Lesnar later down the road, maybe at the Royal Rumble where Roman Reigns wins to go on to face Lesnar at WM. I know I didn't add a Lesnar idea above, but Rollins curb stomped Lesnar. Even though Heyman confronted Rollins, there still has to be hidden heat between Lesnar and Rollins. Lesnar misses TLC and returns as a face to face Rollins (champion), and the Authority. I still think this builds Rollins (and Ambrose) as credible stars.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 21, 2014 12:24:21 GMT -5
If I get Brock/Orton at TLC, I will squeal with joy. Do you mean Survivor Series? If you mean at TLC, would you just want to see Seth v. Rollins at TLC instead of having the championship involved? I think my idea is relatively doable, but WWE will probably give us the same crap they've been giving us for 3 months. I'm all for Orton v. Lesnar at Suvivor Series, then to have Orton v. Ambrose v. Rollins at TLC. I'll be there live so I'd want both.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 12:36:40 GMT -5
I think having Brock Lesnar at Survivor Series is kind of a waste.
TLC would be better and make more sense, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Oct 21, 2014 13:02:01 GMT -5
I have absolutely no interest in seeing Cena/Lesnar IV, the last 2 havent been that great. It'd be Lesnar/Cena V, or Lesnar/Cena VI if you wanna count Team Angle vs Team Lesnar from SS 2003.
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Oct 21, 2014 13:27:05 GMT -5
Brock Lesnar vs. Randy Orton has been set up perfectly. It'll be a shame if WWE doesn't go through with it.
|
|
|
Post by Halloween King on Oct 21, 2014 14:40:20 GMT -5
Orton is so much smaller than Lesner it's going to look like an old fashioned squash match.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Oct 21, 2014 14:52:28 GMT -5
My gut feeling is that they'll go with an Orton victory. Something is telling me this stipulation has purely been added because of Orton's recent hype over Twitter/Vine/Facebook etc with the whole RKO thing.
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Oct 21, 2014 16:57:16 GMT -5
I'm super close to St Louis. If WWE has Orton face Lesnar, I'd definitely make the trip to see Survivor Series.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Oct 21, 2014 16:58:44 GMT -5
it makes sense by giving us an opportunity for Lesnar to face another big name he hasnt yet. it gives a fresh match up for what i assume will be Royal Rumble (lmao)
which is why Cena will win
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 21, 2014 17:08:59 GMT -5
I think having Brock Lesnar at Survivor Series is kind of a waste. TLC would be better and make more sense, IMO. Sounds selfish. I'm down though.
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Oct 21, 2014 17:35:02 GMT -5
I would like to see Orton/Lesnar, but I'm not confident that we will see Orton vs. Lesnar. I hope I'm wrong, but I can see us getting Lesnar vs. Cena III.
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Oct 21, 2014 17:39:01 GMT -5
Do you mean Survivor Series? If you mean at TLC, would you just want to see Seth v. Rollins at TLC instead of having the championship involved? I think my idea is relatively doable, but WWE will probably give us the same crap they've been giving us for 3 months. I'm all for Orton v. Lesnar at Suvivor Series, then to have Orton v. Ambrose v. Rollins at TLC. I'll be there live so I'd want both. If we get Rollins/Ambrose and Lesnar wrestling at TLC, I would care less what the rest of the card looks like. Being my first PPV attending live, I would love Rollins/Ambrose in a TLC Match and Lesnar vs. Orton for the title, maybe in a Tables Match if we get Orton/Lesnar at Survivor Series. It's wishful thinking, but Ambrose/Rollins seems more possible.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 17:42:13 GMT -5
Here's what I think should happen: Cena loses at HIAC. Bada Boom. I'm assuming after HIAC, Rollins and Ambrose will be done. Even though I'd like for them to have one more match at TLC, I feel like it is. Seth v. Randy will be a future championship match. The question will be, will Seth, and Dean involve themselves during Lesnar v. Orton (when it happens, hopefully at Survivor Series, and as a stipulation match) in order to have Randy pin Lesnar and win the title? This could lead into Randy v. Seth v. Dean for the title. I wouldn't mind that at all. I was all for Lesnar winning the title from Cena, but with Lesnar defeating Undertaker, this elevates the chances of Lesnar losing cleanly very, very high. So, I'm hoping there will be some interference with Seth, Dean, or both. Now, how would Ambrose and Rollins be involved? At Survivor Series, Orton is facing Lesnar, Seth interferes attacking Orton. Brock joins in on the beatdown towards Orton. Then, Ambrose's theme hits to save Orton. Ambrose cleans house, hitting Dirty Deeds on both Seth, and Lesnar (maybe throw a couple kendo/chair shots in the mix), allowing Orton to pin Lesnar for the title. The next night on Raw, Orton is involved in a tag match with Ambrose facing Seth and Kane. As the match goes on, Orton and Ambrose pull victory. Triple H and Stephanie walk down to the ring distracting Orton, and Ambrose, while Kane and Seth take advantage and beat down the two. Seth then cashes in on Orton, making Seth the new WWE champion. Then, connecting all of the dots, the next Monday, Orton orders his rematch clause to take place at TLC. Dean Ambrose interrupts Orton demanding to be put in the TLC match with him and Rollins. Ambrose would say that without him, Orton wouldn't have been champion at all. There's my two cents. Not the best, but I think it would be interesting to say the least. Not sure where Brock or Cena would fit in the mix, but I honestly could care less about those two. I know I should've added Lesnar's rematch clause, but I didn't. Decent idea, but destroys Lesnar's credibility, which while you COULDN'T care less, is kind of the reason they're pushing his reign so hard. Lesnar should not lose via cash-in, it would be a huge mistake, as would losing with an interference. If Lesnar is going to lose, have Reigns/Ambrose/Rollins do it clean and get them over. If you want to build new stars, there are plenty of ways to do it, and beating Lesnar clean would be, by far, the best way to do it right now. Agreed 1 million percent.......having Lesnar lose via cash in would be a colossal mistake. 1) he isn't going to be around enough to seek revenge in a meaningful program 2) It utterly defeats the purpose of his huge push and the work they have put into his "aura" if you will.
|
|
|
Post by "The Perfect Ten" Mizard on Oct 21, 2014 17:58:40 GMT -5
I want Orton to win against Cena at Hell in the Cell. We all know that Orton wouldn't win against Lesnar but the build up and actual match would be quite good.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 18:12:33 GMT -5
Orton is so much smaller than Lesner it's going to look like an old fashioned squash match. Orton is bigger than Cena ?? Lol
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 16:57:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2014 18:18:55 GMT -5
Hands down the best thing Miz has ever done.
|
|