Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 15:55:26 GMT -5
Except after it's over Ambrose has no where to go but down. Rollins has MitB so he's a guaranteed world champ. Wish I could say the same about Dean. John Cena Unsuccessfully cashed it in. Its not guaranteed that he will be champ.
|
|
|
Post by Boy Wonder on Sept 25, 2014 16:14:36 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Sept 25, 2014 16:32:21 GMT -5
Except after it's over Ambrose has no where to go but down. Rollins has MitB so he's a guaranteed world champ. Wish I could say the same about Dean. John Cena Unsuccessfully cashed it in. Its not guaranteed that he will be champ. He's John Cena lol. He's a 15 time world champion. Sandow would be a better example, but WWE has never cared about him, and he was never protected.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,246
|
Post by hbkowns on Sept 25, 2014 18:32:17 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Geeze. Really? Ambrose a poor mans Punk? I swear everybody here severely overrates Punk in every way conceivable. And I don't even see the similarity between the two. Both were Indy guys, that's about it.
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Sept 25, 2014 19:57:17 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Geeze. Really? Ambrose a poor mans Punk? I swear everybody here severely overrates Punk in every way conceivable. And I don't even see the similarity between the two. Both were Indy guys, that's about it. This exactly. I can't stand how the iwc overrates punk and puts him on god like levels. Dean is nothing like him.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2014 22:08:20 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Ambrose is better than Punk.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Sept 25, 2014 23:17:03 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Ambrose is better than Punk. THIS. And I'm a huge Punk fan!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2014 0:32:55 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Geeze. Really? Ambrose a poor mans Punk? I swear everybody here severely overrates Punk in every way conceivable. And I don't even see the similarity between the two. Both were Indy guys, that's about it. Agreed. Both were "names" on the Indy scene....similarities begin & end there.
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Sept 26, 2014 11:00:08 GMT -5
that would be an interesting feud but Ambrose has to be a heel and must go over
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Sept 26, 2014 14:26:44 GMT -5
i'd like to see them to a series of interviews aired on raw with him, similar to how jr and mankind did back in the 90s. build him.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Sept 27, 2014 0:30:38 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2014 22:44:54 GMT -5
After RAW I can see this happening some time soon
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Sept 29, 2014 23:27:33 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Ambrose is better than Punk. No, no he is not. A better face maybe, but not better at being a heel. Ambrose is a nice guy an awkward guy I've heard, but still nice, so he has to act like an bunghole, Punk is an bunghole and you can tell. He's just a pumped up version of his actual self. I'd take Punk over Ambrose any day of the week. Dean Ambrose is Dean Ambrose, not a poor mans Punk. I'll never get why people make that comparison. Yes, they both wrestled indies, yes they are good on the mic and in the ring, past that they are not the same at all.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2014 23:50:31 GMT -5
Ambrose is better than Punk. No, no he is not. A better face maybe, but not better at being a heel. Ambrose is a nice guy an awkward guy I've heard, but still nice, so he has to act like an bunghole, Punk is an bunghole and you can tell. He's just a pumped up version of his actual self. I'd take Punk over Ambrose any day of the week. Dean Ambrose is Dean Ambrose, not a poor mans Punk. I'll never get why people make that comparison. Yes, they both wrestled indies, yes they are good on the mic and in the ring, past that they are not the same at all. I'll agree the comparison between the two really isn't there, but I'll disagree on Punk being better. Ambrose cuts a better promo, and Punk was always overrated in the ring. Though I think Ambrose desperately needs a better finisher.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Sept 30, 2014 0:24:14 GMT -5
No, no he is not. A better face maybe, but not better at being a heel. Ambrose is a nice guy an awkward guy I've heard, but still nice, so he has to act like an bunghole, Punk is an bunghole and you can tell. He's just a pumped up version of his actual self. I'd take Punk over Ambrose any day of the week. Dean Ambrose is Dean Ambrose, not a poor mans Punk. I'll never get why people make that comparison. Yes, they both wrestled indies, yes they are good on the mic and in the ring, past that they are not the same at all. I'll agree the comparison between the two really isn't there, but I'll disagree on Punk being better. Ambrose cuts a better promo, and Punk was always overrated in the ring. Though I think Ambrose desperately needs a better finisher. Well, to each their own. I'd fire Ambrose to bring back Punk if that were a choice. My opinion may change eventually but for now I like Punk's promos and work a lot better than Dean's.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 0:25:04 GMT -5
I'll agree the comparison between the two really isn't there, but I'll disagree on Punk being better. Ambrose cuts a better promo, and Punk was always overrated in the ring. Though I think Ambrose desperately needs a better finisher. Well, to each their own. I'd fire Ambrose to bring back Punk if that were a choice. My opinion may change eventually but for now I like Punk's promos and work a lot better than Dean's. Personally, I'd rather bring back a heel Punk to feud the two.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Sept 30, 2014 0:26:38 GMT -5
Well, to each their own. I'd fire Ambrose to bring back Punk if that were a choice. My opinion may change eventually but for now I like Punk's promos and work a lot better than Dean's. Personally, I'd rather bring back a heel Punk to feud the two. Me too, I could see that being a great rivalry and Punk said he'd want Ambrose to retire him. Mania main event career vs title, Punk vs Ambrose. Book it Vince/Hunter. I'm not saying I want Ambrose released, just if I had the choice between the two, that would be it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 0:27:55 GMT -5
Personally, I'd rather bring back a heel Punk to feud the two. Me too, I could see that being a great rivalry and Punk said he'd want Ambrose to retire him. Mania main event career vs title, Punk vs Ambrose. Book it Vince/Hunter. I'm not saying I want Ambrose released, just if I had the choice between the two, that would be it. The IWC might literally explode if that were to headline Mania.
|
|
|
Post by "The Perfect Ten" Mizard on Sept 30, 2014 6:20:25 GMT -5
Great, Cena vs poor mans Punk Ambrose is better than Punk. CM Punk's response to this.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 5:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 6:37:12 GMT -5
Ambrose is better than Punk. THIS. And I'm a huge Punk fan! I'd like to third this.
|
|