|
|
Post by rustyy on Jul 24, 2014 16:00:34 GMT -5
Cena's going to win the title back, Brock's going to destroy Cena after the match, and then Rollins is going to take the title from Cena. Night of Champions or Hell in a Cell. Also, if you've been paying attention to the storyline, Seth and Brock are technically on the same team, or at least part of the same overall Authority plan. If HHH is happy with Brock as champion then it doesn't make sense to have Rollins march out to the ring and take the title from him. Brock's leaving TV, Cena's got movies to film, and we're heading into the down period before Mania season. It makes all the sense in the world to put the title on the Authority backed Seth Rollins while they build up Roman Reigns and have him chase the title. Then Cena can be a 17 time champion because we all know Seth isn't being Golden Boy. |
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jul 24, 2014 16:03:14 GMT -5
Cena's going to win the title back, Brock's going to destroy Cena after the match, and then Rollins is going to take the title from Cena. Night of Champions or Hell in a Cell. Also, if you've been paying attention to the storyline, Seth and Brock are technically on the same team, or at least part of the same overall Authority plan. If HHH is happy with Brock as champion then it doesn't make sense to have Rollins march out to the ring and take the title from him. Brock's leaving TV, Cena's got movies to film, and we're heading into the down period before Mania season. It makes all the sense in the world to put the title on the Authority backed Seth Rollins while they build up Roman Reigns and have him chase the title. Then Cena can be a 17 time champion because we all know Seth isn't being Golden Boy. Cena is getting to 17 no matter what. It's irrelevant to me when it happens. I think his 16th will be a transition to Rollins and then they'll make a big huge deal out of his 17th title reign, the one that actually surpasses Flair. |
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Jul 24, 2014 16:12:25 GMT -5
Then Cena can be a 17 time champion because we all know Seth isn't being Golden Boy. Cena is getting to 17 no matter what. It's irrelevant to me when it happens. I think his 16th will be a transition to Rollins and then they'll make a big huge deal out of his 17th title reign, the one that actually surpasses Flair. Seth will have a one month title reign, maybe 2 if he cashes in on Cena. Plus Lesnar's rematch clause if they even do that. Yeah I know he'll get to 17 but I'd rather not have 3 reigns in like 4 months. |
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Jul 24, 2014 16:53:57 GMT -5
Lesnar will drop the belt to Reigns, Bryan or Batista.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Jul 24, 2014 16:56:46 GMT -5
I don't see Seth Rollins successfully cashing the title on anyone, especially Brock Lesnar. I don't see WWE having Lesnar lose to anyone unless it's Cena or if Lesnar's champion till Wrestlemania ,like it's been speculated to happen, to Roman Reigns. Now if that happens, I could see Rollins cashing in on Reigns, but I don't see him being successful. I've been saying since Rollins won MITB that he'd be cashing in on Reigns and losing. It puts a cap on the shield break-up and puts Roman over even more. |
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Jul 24, 2014 17:17:47 GMT -5
I don't see Seth cashing in until almost MITB of next year. It just wouldnt make sense for current plans. The real money to be made here I feel would be to have Lesnar beat Cena at Summerslam, continue building up guys like Reigns/Ambrose/Rollins/Cesaro in main event feuds while Lesnar wrestles every other PPV, Reigns beat Lesnar at Wrestlemania, and Rollins to cash in on Reigns after Reigns has a 3 month run with the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Jul 24, 2014 17:21:56 GMT -5
I don't see Seth Rollins successfully cashing the title on anyone, especially Brock Lesnar. I don't see WWE having Lesnar lose to anyone unless it's Cena or if Lesnar's champion till Wrestlemania ,like it's been speculated to happen, to Roman Reigns. Now if that happens, I could see Rollins cashing in on Reigns, but I don't see him being successful. I've been saying since Rollins won MITB that he'd be cashing in on Reigns and losing. It puts a cap on the shield break-up and puts Roman over even more. The thing is, to me at least, I don't really see Seth Rollins as being World Champion material, at least not now. I see him getting the Jeff Hardy where it'll take a long time before getting the World Title. He's talented as f*** but I only see being an upper card. Dean Ambrose, he looks like he could be World Champion sooner than later. Roman Reigns, of course they're grooming him to be the next top guy. I just don't buy Seth Rollins being World Champion material, at least not yet. My opinion could change over time. It doesn't matter that he's put with Orton, HHH, Kane. At least they didn't have to put Ambrose and Reigns with anybody to get over. Ambrose, he's one of the most over guys right now. Roman Reigns, he gets a great reaction as well, maybe second to Ambrose. |
|
Zincdust
Main Eventer
WF 20+ Year Member
WF Day 1 Member
Redefining "Old Toy Weirdo"
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 15:13:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,473
|
Post by Zincdust on Jul 24, 2014 17:35:34 GMT -5
Could he cash it in on Lesnar? Sure; why not?
Could he SUCCESSFULLY cash in on Lesnar? Absolutely not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Karate on Jul 24, 2014 17:37:49 GMT -5
I've been saying since Rollins won MITB that he'd be cashing in on Reigns and losing. It puts a cap on the shield break-up and puts Roman over even more. The thing is, to me at least, I don't really see Seth Rollins as being World Champion material, at least not now. I see him getting the Jeff Hardy where it'll take a long time before getting the World Title. He's talented as f*** but I only see being an upper card. Dean Ambrose, he looks like he could be World Champion sooner than later. Roman Reigns, of course they're grooming him to be the next top guy. I just don't buy Seth Rollins being World Champion material, at least not yet. My opinion could change over time. It doesn't matter that he's put with Orton, HHH, Kane. At least they didn't have to put Ambrose and Reigns with anybody to get over. Ambrose, he's one of the most over guys right now. Roman Reigns, he gets a great reaction as well, maybe second to Ambrose. No doubt Reigns gets the second best reactions to Ambrose. Thing with Rollins is that he had no character the entire run with the Shield. Reigns didn't have one either but he didn't need one. He got over without it and still has more charisma then Rollins. He comes across very awkward and forced on the mic 75% of the time. He's as good as it gets in the ring but he has that Jeff Hardy appeal right now. Being the Authorities lacky is doing him no favors either. If they were treating him as the chosen one and less like a puppet he might be seen in a different light. Right now Rollins doesn't deserve the world title. And I don't think he will for a long time. Dean deserves the belt more then both of them right now and I've been an avid supporter of Reigns since well over a year ago. Dean is lighting the world on fire while Roman is being saddled with storylines that have no meaning. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 0:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 21:09:44 GMT -5
Not unless he wants to be slaughtered...
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jul 24, 2014 21:26:54 GMT -5
Brock Lesnar is a beast. His tenure in UFC only solidified this. Then he comes back breaking arms and ending the streak...If you have him win and then right away lose the World Title to a guy half his size, its going to completely kill everything they've done to build him up as an unstoppable monster.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Jul 24, 2014 22:36:26 GMT -5
I still think that Lesnar will win and hold the title until Reigns wins the royal rumble and challenges lesnar for the wwe title at mania, wins. seth cashes in on reigns.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 0:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2014 1:48:35 GMT -5
It's Brock Lesnar face turn time. I mean he's been heel for two years or whatever since he came back. I believe there will be a beat down post match with Cesaro and Heyman also being part of the turn on Lesnar, setting Lesnar up for an almighty hero return the next time he's around. And Rollins will be champion. There's no way in hell that Paul Heyman is turning on Brock, not at this point. also, Cesaro is done with Heyman, so that makes no sense either. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 0:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2014 1:53:26 GMT -5
I like the sound of that, as long as it doesn't mean Cena wins the tournament. It may not be much better, but I honestly think Batista would win the tournament if they go that route. That would allow the storyline of Triple H trying to bring the title back to The Authority to stay alive. Batista would likely get face reactions going up against the likes of Orton and Trips. You can have him hold it til Royal Rumble until Trips convinces Lesnar to come back and win the belt. Then Lesnar holds it til Mania and drops to the Rumble winner whether it's Bryan (health permitting) or Reigns. I think that's how you get Lesnar to Mania with the title. He doesn't have to hold it all the way from SummerSlam to Mania uninterrupted. People whined about The Rock holding it for three months, so Lesnar having it for eight months isn't realistic. I agree that Brock shouldn't hold it for that long. but really, there's no way in hell Batista is getting face reactions, even against Orton and HHH. Batista holding the belt until the royal rumble would be a MASSIVE mistake. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 0:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2014 1:59:05 GMT -5
IIRC, Rock defended the title each PPV he held it and it was only for 3 months. People are talking about a 8-9 month reign for Lesnar when he shows up maybe 2-3 times a year. That would be suicidal for WWE since WWE uses that belt to sell every PPV. It's not going to be suicidal. They used to have the titled defended 5 or 6 times a year and it made it more important. I think Lesnar will show at least to all the PPVs Do you mean Lesnar will go to all the ppv's? That's what it sounds like you mean, and that is really not true, he only has limited apearences. NO WAY is he apearing at all the PPV's. |
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Jul 25, 2014 2:00:42 GMT -5
I don't think Rollins will cash in until after WrestleMania. I could see some Shield triple threat matches for the title at Extreme Rules/Payback/Money in the Bank etc next year.
I could also see Rollins cashing in on Cena at the end of Hell in a Cell after Cena regains from Lesnar, but I just don't know where the belt would go from there. I think they want Reigns to win it from someone older/more established at WrestleMania next year. So I guess it could go Cena>Lesnar>Cena>Rollins>Bryan>Batista>Reigns or something, but that's a lot of title changes for a six or seven month period. And if Bryan's not back, I don't know who'd transition the title from Rollins to Batista. I guess it'd be Cena again.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 25, 2014 2:03:02 GMT -5
I seriously doubt that unless they want to  him over and have Lesnar retain.. -_- I think he'll cash in Reigns, probably near the very end of his one year cash in time. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mask of Truth on Jul 25, 2014 3:15:03 GMT -5
I vote nay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Jul 25, 2014 6:25:33 GMT -5
There's a difference between "could" and "will". If Lesnar's champ, then it's entirely possible Seth could cash in.
|
|
TeamratedCDS
Superstar
Joined on: May 12, 2014 20:11:12 GMT -5
Posts: 858 
|
Post by TeamratedCDS on Jul 25, 2014 6:42:07 GMT -5
Brock would shove that briefcase up Rollins a**. This turning Rollins into an ATM machine.
I don't think so, Tim.
|
|
