|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Jul 24, 2014 11:48:10 GMT -5
I thought he was on RAW this week, then he's off on the 4th? Anyway, like you said Lesnar & Heyman are out for themselves so I can that happening. He wasn't on RAW this week, he won't be next week, then he's back. Nope. Cena's on Raw next week. He missed this week and he misses August 4th.
|
|
RollinsFan44
Main Eventer
12 UK Classifieds Refs.
Joined on: Feb 27, 2013 13:05:53 GMT -5
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by RollinsFan44 on Jul 24, 2014 11:59:45 GMT -5
I was thinking this over my head while watching Rollins with the case this past Monday on RAW, I can't see him legitmately cashing on Lesnar. It would hurt Lesnar as a character way too much. I can see Lesnar going over at Summerslam and best case scenario he keeps the title until Wrestlemania 31 where he faces Roman Reigns in a singles match. Roman goes over and Rollins becomes the first person to ever cash in at a Wrestlemania and still gets to keep his feud going with Reigns and Ambrose.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 11:29:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 12:03:50 GMT -5
I was thinking this over my head while watching Rollins with the case this past Monday on RAW, I can't see him legitmately cashing on Lesnar. It would hurt Lesnar as a character way too much. I can see Lesnar going over at Summerslam and best case scenario he keeps the title until Wrestlemania 31 where he faces Roman Reigns in a singles match. Roman goes over and Rollins becomes the first person to ever cash in at a Wrestlemania and still gets to keep his feud going with Reigns and Ambrose. .....have a inactive champion for that long?? Would you actually like that? No RAW's with the champion there...really? The BEST he could do, and I mean the BEST, this is still doubtful, but him wrestling every other PPV, and tbh I wouldn't like that, maybe if the titles weren't unified, maybe, but they are, and I wouldn't like that.
|
|
RollinsFan44
Main Eventer
12 UK Classifieds Refs.
Joined on: Feb 27, 2013 13:05:53 GMT -5
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by RollinsFan44 on Jul 24, 2014 12:16:23 GMT -5
I was thinking this over my head while watching Rollins with the case this past Monday on RAW, I can't see him legitmately cashing on Lesnar. It would hurt Lesnar as a character way too much. I can see Lesnar going over at Summerslam and best case scenario he keeps the title until Wrestlemania 31 where he faces Roman Reigns in a singles match. Roman goes over and Rollins becomes the first person to ever cash in at a Wrestlemania and still gets to keep his feud going with Reigns and Ambrose. .....have a inactive champion for that long?? Would you actually like that? No RAW's with the champion there...really? The BEST he could do, and I mean the BEST, this is still doubtful, but him wrestling every other PPV, and tbh I wouldn't like that, maybe if the titles weren't unified, maybe, but they are, and I wouldn't like that. I don't even want Brock as champion in the first place if I'm completely honest. But there's no logistical person to put as the champion at this point in time within the WWE in my opinion, I mean sure there's guys like Bray and Reigns and others on the active roster that have a ton of potential to be WWE World Heavyweight champion in the future. But it's too early to put the title on Bray or Reigns so soon in my opinion, hence why they should have Reigns go over Brock at 'Mania and tease the fact that "Oh yeah, this guy is truly on his way" and then you get the "Oh crap, here comes Rollins with his briefcase" factor, it would be historical as well because he'd be the first person to cash in at Wrestlemania as well, which would push Rollins further and give him some more bragging rights over his former tag team partner(s)
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 11:29:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 12:20:41 GMT -5
No way Jose'.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 11:29:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 12:29:16 GMT -5
.....have a inactive champion for that long?? Would you actually like that? No RAW's with the champion there...really? The BEST he could do, and I mean the BEST, this is still doubtful, but him wrestling every other PPV, and tbh I wouldn't like that, maybe if the titles weren't unified, maybe, but they are, and I wouldn't like that. I don't even want Brock as champion in the first place if I'm completely honest. But there's no logistical person to put as the champion at this point in time within the WWE in my opinion, I mean sure there's guys like Bray and Reigns and others on the active roster that have a ton of potential to be WWE World Heavyweight champion in the future. But it's too early to put the title on Bray or Reigns so soon in my opinion, hence why they should have Reigns go over Brock at 'Mania and tease the fact that "Oh yeah, this guy is truly on his way" and then you get the "Oh crap, here comes Rollins with his briefcase" factor, it would be historical as well because he'd be the first person to cash in at Wrestlemania as well, which would push Rollins further and give him some more bragging rights over his former tag team partner(s) Yeah, I suppose their isn't really anyone to put it on ATM, so in that factor, it does make sense. It would be cool for Regns to go over brock at wm.
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Jul 24, 2014 12:55:05 GMT -5
There is no doubt in my mind Lesnar is rolling into Mania as champion. He doesn't have to be on every show, Heyman can play it up that the fans don't deserve him every night. It might actual make title matches important again. I see Reigns winning at Mania, then Rollins screws him over in the biggest cash in ever.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Jul 24, 2014 13:21:55 GMT -5
I see Cena winning at Summerslam, Maybe due to a DQ or something and Brock will decimate him, Then Seth will come out and cash in. They wont put the title on Brock with his schedule. There is no way. The WWE WHC is WWE's crown jewel. They are not going to let someone who wrestles 2 times a year hold that belt and skip PPVs constantly.
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on Jul 24, 2014 13:27:53 GMT -5
It's Brock Lesnar face turn time. I mean he's been heel for two years or whatever since he came back. I believe there will be a beat down post match with Cesaro and Heyman also being part of the turn on Lesnar, setting Lesnar up for an almighty hero return the next time he's around.
And Rollins will be champion.
|
|
|
Post by Slim on Jul 24, 2014 13:36:48 GMT -5
I think Roman Reigns will win the title on Lesnar at WM, and then, Rollins cash in.
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Jul 24, 2014 13:45:56 GMT -5
I see Cena winning at Summerslam, Maybe due to a DQ or something and Brock will decimate him, Then Seth will come out and cash in. They wont put the title on Brock with his schedule. There is no way. The WWE WHC is WWE's crown jewel. They are not going to let someone who wrestles 2 times a year hold that belt and skip PPVs constantly. Like they did with the Rock last year?
|
|
|
Post by awesomeallamerican on Jul 24, 2014 13:53:23 GMT -5
Lesnar beats Cena at SummerSlam and surrenders the titles the next night on Raw citing the fact that he has accomplished anything and everything in WWE. That sets up a WrestleMania IV or Deadly Games-esque tournament at Night of Champions for the strap. It would be bad business to have Lesnar lose to anyone until WrestleMania XXXI at the earliest because you squander the momentum gained from ending the streak. Even if Lesnar is prone and Rollins cashes in it makes Lesnar look bad to some degree. I like the sound of that, as long as it doesn't mean Cena wins the tournament. It may not be much better, but I honestly think Batista would win the tournament if they go that route. That would allow the storyline of Triple H trying to bring the title back to The Authority to stay alive. Batista would likely get face reactions going up against the likes of Orton and Trips. You can have him hold it til Royal Rumble until Trips convinces Lesnar to come back and win the belt. Then Lesnar holds it til Mania and drops to the Rumble winner whether it's Bryan (health permitting) or Reigns. I think that's how you get Lesnar to Mania with the title. He doesn't have to hold it all the way from SummerSlam to Mania uninterrupted. People whined about The Rock holding it for three months, so Lesnar having it for eight months isn't realistic.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 11:29:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 14:00:12 GMT -5
I like the sound of that, as long as it doesn't mean Cena wins the tournament. It may not be much better, but I honestly think Batista would win the tournament if they go that route. That would allow the storyline of Triple H trying to bring the title back to The Authority to stay alive. Batista would likely get face reactions going up against the likes of Orton and Trips. You can have him hold it til Royal Rumble until Trips convinces Lesnar to come back and win the belt. Then Lesnar holds it til Mania and drops to the Rumble winner whether it's Bryan (health permitting) or Reigns. I think that's how you get Lesnar to Mania with the title. He doesn't have to hold it all the way from SummerSlam to Mania uninterrupted. People whined about The Rock holding it for three months, so Lesnar having it for eight months isn't realistic. I'd actually like that.
|
|
Dan.
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 5, 2009 12:46:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,989
|
Post by Dan. on Jul 24, 2014 14:14:04 GMT -5
nah, lesnar carries the belt (i mean 'title', sorry vince) to wrestlemania, loses it to Reigns, Reigns looks badass, huge pop, then BAM. Rollins cashes in, ultimate heat. sorta like Orton/Bryan at summerslam, except with people actually caring about the heel.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Jul 24, 2014 14:22:28 GMT -5
I see Cena winning at Summerslam, Maybe due to a DQ or something and Brock will decimate him, Then Seth will come out and cash in. They wont put the title on Brock with his schedule. There is no way. The WWE WHC is WWE's crown jewel. They are not going to let someone who wrestles 2 times a year hold that belt and skip PPVs constantly. Like they did with the Rock last year? IIRC, Rock defended the title each PPV he held it and it was only for 3 months. People are talking about a 8-9 month reign for Lesnar when he shows up maybe 2-3 times a year. That would be suicidal for WWE since WWE uses that belt to sell every PPV.
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Jul 24, 2014 14:34:17 GMT -5
Like they did with the Rock last year? IIRC, Rock defended the title each PPV he held it and it was only for 3 months. People are talking about a 8-9 month reign for Lesnar when he shows up maybe 2-3 times a year. That would be suicidal for WWE since WWE uses that belt to sell every PPV. It's not going to be suicidal. They used to have the titled defended 5 or 6 times a year and it made it more important. I think Lesnar will show at least to all the PPVs
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Jul 24, 2014 14:39:24 GMT -5
Nah, he's gonna feud with Dean for awhile. Give it a couple of months.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Jul 24, 2014 14:46:36 GMT -5
He'll be known as the one who beat the one in 21-1.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 24, 2014 15:27:03 GMT -5
Lesnar could wrestle a 6 hour match against Cena and still look like a man with enough energy to rip Rollins' arms off and eat them for breakfast if he tries to cash in. No I don't think he should even try it.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jul 24, 2014 15:37:21 GMT -5
IIRC, Rock defended the title each PPV he held it and it was only for 3 months. People are talking about a 8-9 month reign for Lesnar when he shows up maybe 2-3 times a year. That would be suicidal for WWE since WWE uses that belt to sell every PPV. It's not going to be suicidal. They used to have the titled defended 5 or 6 times a year and it made it more important. I think Lesnar will show at least to all the PPVs This isn't 1988 brother, and that wasn't a time when there were 4 WWE tv shows a week. Even then, the champ still worked every live show. Lesnar isn't working more dates and he's not going to work with anyone outside of Cena. We're getting Lesnar vs Cena for 2-3 PPVs and then Lesnar is going back home, without the title. He'll show up again around Mania time, at which point he'll likely face the Rock because that's the biggest money match the WWE can possibly come up with right now.
|
|