|
|
Post by slappy on Apr 16, 2014 4:35:42 GMT -5
Good.
I am sick to death of the rematch clause.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 5:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2014 4:37:24 GMT -5
The gm/authority/whoever decides when the person invokes their rematch clause, not the superstar. I guess that's the excuse for Orton, as Triple H wants evolution to take on the shield, and not have Orton worry about Bryan. And AJ I believe is injured or something
|
|
|
|
Post by Slim on Apr 16, 2014 4:38:44 GMT -5
AJ may have her rematch. Orton with Triple H and Batista will be against the shield. Daniel Bryan might be against Kane.
|
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Apr 16, 2014 4:43:21 GMT -5
I've been wondering the same thing. Maybe they're doing Shield vs Evolution since there have been so many Orton and Bryan matches in recent months.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Apr 16, 2014 5:33:35 GMT -5
Does anyone really care that we're not gonna see Bryan vs. Orton for the 8,000th time?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Apr 16, 2014 7:21:21 GMT -5
I'm not a fan of Kane vs. Daniel Bryan, however I'm glad it's not Randy Orton/Bryan again. I would've enjoyed Bryan/Batista to be honest, but I can't hide my excitement for Evolution vs. The Shield.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 5:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2014 12:07:11 GMT -5
Rematch clause is intellectually- disabled anyway.
|
|
becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Apr 17, 2014 10:22:25 GMT -5
The Rock also has a rematch clause for the then WWE Championship that he lost at Wrestlemania 29 to John Cena....
|
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Apr 17, 2014 13:31:44 GMT -5
They actually addressed Orton's rematch clause on RAW, the night after WrestleMania.
Orton brought it up because HHH was facing Bryan that night, and HHH more or less said it was on hold.
But considering it was two weeks ago, and there hasn't been 14 different replays of the moment on either RAW or Smackdown, I fully expect it to be ignored.
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Apr 17, 2014 13:43:39 GMT -5
All I know is I do not want to see Orton vs. Daniel Bryan again,nor do I want to see Kane in the title picture.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 5:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2014 13:53:32 GMT -5
Bryan vs. Cesaro. Let's get this done WWE.
|
|
becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Apr 17, 2014 19:46:00 GMT -5
Bryan vs. Cesaro. Let's get this done WWE. It will be done somewhere down the road. But its still too soon to do it now... |
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Apr 17, 2014 21:44:55 GMT -5
I've almost always hated rematches. I don't need to see Bryan vs Orton for the millionth time.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 5:47:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2014 8:44:20 GMT -5
Rematch clause is intellectually- disabled anyway. Yes. For example it sucks that at the end of one PPV where a title changes hands you know in a month at the next PPV you're going to get the exact same match. |
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Apr 18, 2014 9:19:08 GMT -5
They will eventually. Even if it's a throw away match on Main Event.
|
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Apr 18, 2014 10:58:54 GMT -5
Because storylines/feuds (usually) start fresh after WrestleMania.
|
|
