DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Aug 6, 2013 18:56:41 GMT -5
Sorry guys but that's obviously the WWE logo. It may look like the WWF one, but there's WWE Logos on the sides of the strap, and it would be pretty stupid to have the WWF logo and the WWE logo on the same belt. Yep there definitely are standard WWE logos on the side. That sucks... |
|
Dfreedom30
Mid-Carder
Fly for Freedom
Joined on: May 14, 2011 21:36:13 GMT -5
Posts: 156
|
Post by Dfreedom30 on Aug 6, 2013 19:07:22 GMT -5
It's most definitely the WWE logo on the center plate. It's just the glare that's making it appear to have the extension of the "F" on the right side of the "WW." Also, the prototype that was showed at the Mattel/WWE panel had the WWE logo featured on the Women's Championship.  |
|
|
|
Wwf logo?
Aug 6, 2013 19:36:24 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by JDSFullmetal on Aug 6, 2013 19:36:24 GMT -5
I'm 100% sure that is a WWE logo, mostly because that is the 2002-2010 belt(With the name plate) It would be a dumb move to put the WWF logo on a belt thats based on a post WWF design. What's the difference between the two? I thought just the logo. With the logo change they also added a name plate for center plate. |
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Aug 6, 2013 19:38:25 GMT -5
What's the difference between the two? I thought just the logo. With the logo change they also added a name plate for center plate. Never realized that. Thanks for clearing it up. |
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Aug 6, 2013 20:13:40 GMT -5
I would believe it if the strap didn't have a million WWE logos on it.
|
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Aug 6, 2013 20:31:23 GMT -5
Yea, it's been brought to our attention...
|
|
jeffro2000
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 16, 2011 14:23:29 GMT -5
Posts: 1,858
|
Post by jeffro2000 on Aug 6, 2013 21:25:13 GMT -5
As stated it is the WWE logo. While they can now use the WWF logo again (scratch) don't expect to see it on anything. As stated, they can't use it on anything new. Also, WWE seems to be phasing the F out anyway. They could always use the block logo on replica belts, but now don't in the past year.
They pulled all WWF replica belts overnight and have been replacing them with a WW style block. Nothing has changed with the Panda suit, it seems to be WWE's decision to do that.
|
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Aug 7, 2013 0:20:27 GMT -5
Can someone tell me why WWE couldn't use the WWF scratch logo in the first place? I never got why they blurred it out. Was that apart of the lawsuit?
|
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Aug 7, 2013 0:24:46 GMT -5
Can someone tell me why WWE couldn't use the WWF scratch logo in the first place? I never got why they blurred it out. Was that apart of the lawsuit? The World Wildlife Fund copyrighted WWF so in 2002 WWE had to change it and were never allowed to use it again. Recently though, the WWE won the right to use WWF scratch logo when showing archived footage. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 1, 2024 21:59:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2013 0:31:52 GMT -5
Can someone tell me why WWE couldn't use the WWF scratch logo in the first place? I never got why they blurred it out. Was that apart of the lawsuit? The World Wildlife Fund copyrighted WWF so in 2002 WWE had to change it and were never allowed to use it again. Recently though, the WWE won the right to use WWF scratch logo when showing archived footage. Yeah. Stupid animal lovers. Ruined it all  |
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Aug 7, 2013 0:45:11 GMT -5
Can someone tell me why WWE couldn't use the WWF scratch logo in the first place? I never got why they blurred it out. Was that apart of the lawsuit? The World Wildlife Fund copyrighted WWF so in 2002 WWE had to change it and were never allowed to use it again. Recently though, the WWE won the right to use WWF scratch logo when showing archived footage. Thanks. I knew about the WWF v. WWF lawsuit, I was just never that educated on it because I was so young. I'm glad they recently won the right to use the scratch logo again, though. Defiantly not the same with at least 30 blurs on your screen. |
|
|
|
Post by poindizzle on Aug 7, 2013 11:49:46 GMT -5
I flipped the pic on it's side and it's simply too blurry to tell for sure. I can simultaneously see how it can and cannot be the WWF logo, but the most telling thing to me is the side plate clearly having the WWE logo.
EDIT: Sorry, didn't realize that there was a second page to this thread. Guess this makes my point kind of moot, huh?
|
|
