|
Post by Patriot174 on Nov 25, 2012 13:20:31 GMT -5
The fourth installment of the PPV that substitutes tender, loving care for tables, ladders, and chairs will take place on Sunday, December 16 when WWE makes its debut at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, Brooklyn.*
*JTG likely to not appear at the eventOfficial Theme SongJust Another WarWWE Music Group & Josey Scott Match CardSix-Man Tag Team Tables, Ladders, & Chairs MatchTeam Hell No (Kane, Daniel Bryan) & Ryback vs. The Shield (Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns) World Heavyweight Championship Chairs MatchSheamus vs. The Big Show World Heavyweight Championship Money in the Bank Contract Ladder MatchJohn Cena vs. Dolph Ziggler Intercontinental ChampionshipWade Barrett vs. Kofi Kingston United States ChampionshipAntonio Cesaro vs. R-Truth Rey Mysterio & Sin Cara vs. Team Rhodes Scholars "Santa’s Helper" No. 1 Contender’s Diva Battle RoyalAlicia Fox vs. Rosa Mendes vs. Layla vs. AJ Lee vs. Kaitlyn vs. Aksana vs. Tamina vs. Natalya vs. Naomi vs. Cameron *Match will take place during the Pre-Show streaming on WWE.com, YouTube.com/WWE, and Facebook.com/WWE starting at 7:30PM ET/4:30PM PT*Please keep all PPV talk, tweets, Touts and all that jazz in nyah. Spoilers...spoiler room...you know the deal. Thanks.
|
|
GoHabs76
Mid-Carder
xbl FinkBass42
Joined on: Apr 10, 2011 19:10:47 GMT -5
Posts: 143
|
Post by GoHabs76 on Nov 25, 2012 17:21:40 GMT -5
What exactly are the rules in a Chair match? Are you only allowed to hit your opponent with a chair? Seems kind of silly to me.
Hopefully Ambrose/Rollins/Reigns do something crazy, like triple powerbomb Ryback off a ladder through the announce table.
|
|
|
Post by y2yay on Nov 25, 2012 19:41:03 GMT -5
What exactly are the rules in a Chair match? Are you only allowed to hit your opponent with a chair? Seems kind of silly to me. Hopefully Ambrose/Rollins/Reigns do something crazy, like triple powerbomb Ryback off a ladder through the announce table. Yeah, a chair is a legal weapon in the match. Apparently if you hit someone in the groin with the chair though, that's a disqualification. ing Teddy Long....
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Nov 25, 2012 19:54:23 GMT -5
I wonder if Punk is even going to defend his title at TLC. In all the interviews hes had this week hes been saying that the match with The Rock has been set. Anyway, I'm just hoping that the tag titles get defended in a Table or Ladder match. That would be neat.
|
|
|
Post by y2yay on Nov 25, 2012 20:29:12 GMT -5
I wonder if Punk is even going to defend his title at TLC. In all the interviews hes had this week hes been saying that the match with The Rock has been set. Anyway, I'm just hoping that the tag titles get defended in a Table or Ladder match. That would be neat. I'm sure we'll see Ryback/Punk in a Tables Match or something.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 5:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2012 22:59:25 GMT -5
i want aksana vs eve vs kaitlyn
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Nov 26, 2012 0:35:39 GMT -5
Should be decent. I could see a possible AJ heel turn.
|
|
Maybe! Maybe! Maybe!
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
hulk hogan, we comin' for you, n-...i'll shut up now.
Joined on: Oct 5, 2012 7:35:47 GMT -5
Posts: 177
|
Post by Maybe! Maybe! Maybe! on Nov 26, 2012 5:28:33 GMT -5
*JTG not likely to be at this event.
COMIC GOLD. haha.
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Nov 26, 2012 8:31:08 GMT -5
A Chair match is still one of the most pointless and flatout dumb stipulations I've ever heard. It's no DQ, basically, but you're only allowed to use one weapon? Wow...
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Nov 26, 2012 10:31:17 GMT -5
A Chair match is still one of the most pointless and flatout dumb stipulations I've ever heard. It's no DQ, basically, but you're only allowed to use one weapon? Wow... yep, totally agreed. such dumb behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 26, 2012 11:04:31 GMT -5
Chair matches are just another horrible product of these stupid, ridiculous, and detrimental gimmick Pay-Per-Views.
I'll still contend that it's one of the single worst decisions WWE has ever made.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Nov 26, 2012 14:46:20 GMT -5
Yep, I say it every time. If your going to have a ppv named TLC, EC, or HIAC only do ONE of each match. Look at the Royal Rumble. There's only one Royal Rumble at the Royal Rumble ppv. Why should the others be any different? Extreme Rules kinda gets a pass though.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Nov 26, 2012 18:01:57 GMT -5
I hope to WWE makes Team Hell No Vs Mysterio & Sin Cara Vs Prime Time Players for TLC, in a Triangle Tag Ladder Match. The first time teams are all fighting for the Tag Titles in god knows when, its a perfect time to pull this out.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 5:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2012 18:04:04 GMT -5
Yep, I say it every time. If your going to have a ppv named TLC, EC, or HIAC only do ONE of each match. Look at the Royal Rumble. There's only one Royal Rumble at the Royal Rumble ppv. Why should the others be any different? Extreme Rules kinda gets a pass though. That's exactly what I was going to post. I hate these stupid gimmick match pay per views as it's really devalued what a gimmick match is supposed to be all about. No one gives a crap about TLC, Hell in a Cell, or Elimination Chamber matches because we see them every year. Royal Rumble should be the only match with a pay per view built around it.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 26, 2012 23:25:23 GMT -5
Yep, I say it every time. If your going to have a ppv named TLC, EC, or HIAC only do ONE of each match. Look at the Royal Rumble. There's only one Royal Rumble at the Royal Rumble ppv. Why should the others be any different? Extreme Rules kinda gets a pass though. But even that doesn't help matters. It's interesting, at its core, one could classify Royal Rumble as a "gimmick Pay-Per-View", but it's a long standing tradition that has a specific purpose - to determine the number one contender for a Championship match at Wrestlemania. These other gimmick shows throw two guys into a stipulation simply for the sake of honoring the name of a Pay-Per-View. That's horrible, no matter how many of those matches are on the card. If they're going to do it, at least have the decency to book your angles far enough in advance that a major angle coincides with these shows in a big blow off match. This year, Punk/Cena would have actually made sense to be contested inside the cell. Unfortunately, circumstances prevented that, but that doesn't give WWE a pass. They've been doing this for years now. If the answer to the question "why are CM Punk and Ryback having a TLC match?" is "because it's the TLC Pay-Per-View", then that's a problem, and a product of horribly lazy booking.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Nov 26, 2012 23:30:35 GMT -5
Yep, I say it every time. If your going to have a ppv named TLC, EC, or HIAC only do ONE of each match. Look at the Royal Rumble. There's only one Royal Rumble at the Royal Rumble ppv. Why should the others be any different? Extreme Rules kinda gets a pass though. But even that doesn't help matters. It's interesting, at its core, one could classify Royal Rumble as a "gimmick Pay-Per-View", but it's a long standing tradition that has a specific purpose - to determine the number one contender for a Championship match at Wrestlemania. These other gimmick shows throw two guys into a stipulation simply for the sake of honoring the name of a Pay-Per-View. That's horrible, no matter how many of those matches are on the card. If they're going to do it, at least have the decency to book your angles far enough in advance that a major angle coincides with these shows in a big blow off match. This year, Punk/Cena would have actually made sense to be contested inside the cell. Unfortunately, circumstances prevented that, but that doesn't give WWE a pass. They've been doing this for years now. If the answer to the question "why are CM Punk and Ryback having a TLC match?" is "because it's the TLC Pay-Per-View", then that's a problem, and a product of horribly lazy booking. I hate it too. If I could change one thing about WWE I think the first thing I would do is change the ppv schedule. I miss the moments when a feud would boil and the gm or champ would say that its gonna be a Hell In A Cell or TLC match at the next ppv. Those are special moments. When they announced that Taker vs. HHH would be a HIAC even the people who didnt want to see that match again flipped their sh*t.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Nov 26, 2012 23:35:35 GMT -5
But even that doesn't help matters. It's interesting, at its core, one could classify Royal Rumble as a "gimmick Pay-Per-View", but it's a long standing tradition that has a specific purpose - to determine the number one contender for a Championship match at Wrestlemania. These other gimmick shows throw two guys into a stipulation simply for the sake of honoring the name of a Pay-Per-View. That's horrible, no matter how many of those matches are on the card. If they're going to do it, at least have the decency to book your angles far enough in advance that a major angle coincides with these shows in a big blow off match. This year, Punk/Cena would have actually made sense to be contested inside the cell. Unfortunately, circumstances prevented that, but that doesn't give WWE a pass. They've been doing this for years now. If the answer to the question "why are CM Punk and Ryback having a TLC match?" is "because it's the TLC Pay-Per-View", then that's a problem, and a product of horribly lazy booking. I hate it too. If I could change one thing about WWE I think the first thing I would do is change the ppv schedule. I miss the moments when a feud would boil and the gm or champ would say that its gonna be a Hell In A Cell or TLC match at the next ppv. Those are special moments. When they announced that Taker vs. HHH would be a HIAC even the people who didnt want to see that match again flipped their sh*t. I absolutely agree. It is, undoubtedly, my biggest gripe with the current product and has been for years. I thought I'd get used to it and maybe even "accept it" as tradition after a while, but it's just a horrible format. Hell in a Cell should happen because two guys hate each other, have had multiple matches in the past, and need one big last match to settle things, not because it's October and WWE needs a main event or two. It's just frustrating. They rely on gimmicks to get buys and render the ultimate blow offs useless. When in reality, they could use sharp writing and interesting angles that LEAD to big gimmick blowoffs to gain even more buys.
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Nov 27, 2012 21:41:05 GMT -5
I'd like to see a Tag Team Tables match with Hell No, PTP, and Car Stereo. Dude you need to change the stipulation for Ryback vs. Punk. It's a Tables match now. No, it isn't?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 5:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2012 21:44:20 GMT -5
I'd like to see a Tag Team Tables match with Hell No, PTP, and Car Stereo. Dude you need to change the stipulation for Ryback vs. Punk. It's a Tables match now. No, it isn't? Car Stereo lmao is it AM/FM?
|
|
E N I G M A
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 4, 2010 5:21:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,630
|
Post by E N I G M A on Nov 28, 2012 16:37:37 GMT -5
I want a Multi-Man TagMatch for the Titles, possibly leading to a dispute of TeamHellNO & ending in a title change.
|
|