|
Post by TheChamp420 on May 2, 2012 19:06:15 GMT -5
Brock vs Taker IMO
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on May 2, 2012 21:38:42 GMT -5
Who would be the most exciting to watch? I'd say Undertaker, but honestly, I don't think he's in the right shape to go at it with a man as dangerous as Lesnar. I'm afraid he could be hurt, especially as they both dislike each other in real life.. Plus, if Lesnar really don't care about the business, he could just ruin the entire streak.. Maybe The Rock would be an interesting choice. I don't know, Undertaker seemed in good shape at WM. I think it would be a good match.
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on May 3, 2012 2:11:38 GMT -5
To be honest, I don't even want Brock to be at Mania. It's time WWE quits acting like TNA, and gets rid of all the freaking legends. I'd rather see Punk vs. Cena II at Wrestlemania then see Brock compete.
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on May 3, 2012 4:16:43 GMT -5
Brock should face no one at Mania unless he signs on for another 6 months or more afterwards. His match with Goldberg was horrid. I don't want to see Brock taking up Mania space if he's gonna half ass it like last time. Now if he was staying with the company after that I'd love to see him face a returning Kurt Angle. Either that or someone that can be taken as a serious threat. Normally a big guy can be taken by anybody but Lesnar's different. He's big, and has a serious background now. I don't want to see Brock look weak against anyone smallish like Daniel Bryan. I think him and Sheamus for the title could be an awesome match.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 2:56:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2012 5:32:33 GMT -5
To be honest, I don't even want Brock to be at Mania. It's time WWE quits acting like TNA, and gets rid of all the freaking legends. I'd rather see Punk vs. Cena II at Wrestlemania then see Brock compete. The reason wwe has any thread of being good is because of the veterens. The WWE have in their employment, only 3 people who can wrestle that have debuted after 2002.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on May 3, 2012 5:59:08 GMT -5
To be honest, I don't see why everyone wants Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar purely because they had a little stare down at a UFC Event. I'd much rather see Brock Lesnar vs The Rock for the WWE Championship, and John Cena vs Undertaker.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 2:56:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2012 7:29:59 GMT -5
To be honest, I don't even want Brock to be at Mania. It's time WWE quits acting like TNA, and gets rid of all the freaking legends. I'd rather see Punk vs. Cena II at Wrestlemania then see Brock compete. The reason wwe has any thread of being good is because of the veterens. The WWE have in their employment, only 3 people who can wrestle that have debuted after 2002. Just wondering, who's #3 not counting Daniel Bryan and CM Punk?
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on May 3, 2012 7:47:18 GMT -5
Triple H or Undertaker.
|
|