|
Post by johnmctossy on Oct 15, 2010 21:10:14 GMT -5
I vote WWEUniverse4787
Theswa99: Your animation was slow, stiff i saw string and neither Jeff nor Santino had enough elevation during the twist of fate and the reaction wasn't very good
BenJ: This animation was to fast and choppy which made it really unrealistic but from the beginning the way he positioned looks awkward and everything was pretty fidgety
WWEUniverse4787: This animation was smoother then the rest it even though it was fidgety and i saw string it looked more realistic then the rest
|
|
|
Post by -The Autistic Animator- w.S.e on Oct 16, 2010 6:05:47 GMT -5
wweuniverse4787: Your Animation Was Stiff And The Person Who Got Hit Layed Down Like A Log But It Was A Good Speed Plus The Taunt Was A Great Tuch 7.1/10
theswa99: Your Animation Was To Slow And I Saw Some Sting Bot The Reaction Was Good But The Speed Sort Of Recked It 5/10
--BenJ--: Your Animation Was So Fast I Just Could Not See It Clearly. It Wasnt Choppy But No Taunt. Lower Vote 5.1/10
I Vote For Universe (My Tag Team Partner)
|
|
M
Main Eventer
BWF.
Joined on: Jul 9, 2010 21:38:40 GMT -5
Posts: 4,334
|
Post by M on Oct 16, 2010 6:55:33 GMT -5
Lets get into this. wweuniverse4787The animation looked very rushed (the taunt at the start and TBK's reaction) take your time, it was very choppy, animations don't need to go really really fast, slow it down a bit so we can see what is going on, it was also very stiff, look at every frame you do and see if it looks like the real move, saw string, this can easily be edited out in photofiltre. The airtime was good, Kendrick had a good reation and you had a good ending. Overall: 3.5/10--BenJ--:This is another animation that looked rushed (Jeff was standing wierd at the start), the animation was way too fast, slow it down a little bit, making it fast isnt making it better, it was a bit stiff with jeffs arms, and also you could of had more of an impact with a rope bounce. I loved the swing in the animation, Londons reaction and saw no string. Overall: 4/10theswa99I really liked this animation even though it was a bit slow, it was a t a good speed but could had been sped up a bit more, it also need a couple more frames, the animation wasn't too stiff but it was stiff at parts, i think it needed more of a reaction but youtube could of cut it off and i also saw string. Good things are the move flowed well and it had a good impact. Overall: 4.5/10Winner: theswa99
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Oct 16, 2010 7:48:19 GMT -5
Benj: 1 SWA: 1 WWEUniverse: 0
Is what I got...
(Cannot see animation from 2nd page. Will edit once I view the animations once more.)
I'll try a new way of voting. I'll eliminate the worst out of the three and move on with my reasons for vote.
SWA It seemed your motions were right, but it ended up very stiff. You moved the figures too much each frame, which made it seem choppy. The camera angle was all right and I don't see string. (Did you even use string? You're supposed too) Poor reactions.
All right, moving on to my reasons for voting.
I vote WWEUniverse. BenJ, yours was so fidgety that I had to view it multiple times to figure out what had happened. It looked like you didn't even use string, and the reactions were poor. The lighting changed about three times, which is extremely distracting. At the end, Jeff had a hand raised, you kind of forgot to move that down.
WWE: The reasons I voted for you were that your animation was a bit better on lighting and you actually used string. I'm pretty sure all animations posted require string. It actually had a reaction, though it was really delayed, it was better than none.
|
|
M
Main Eventer
BWF.
Joined on: Jul 9, 2010 21:38:40 GMT -5
Posts: 4,334
|
Post by M on Oct 16, 2010 9:44:20 GMT -5
Benj: 1 SWA: 1 WWEUniverse: 0 Is what I got... (Cannot see animation from 2nd page. Will edit once I view the animations once more.)I'll try a new way of voting. I'll eliminate the worst out of the three and move on with my reasons for vote. SWA It seemed your motions were right, but it ended up very stiff. You moved the figures too much each frame, which made it seem choppy. The camera angle was all right and I don't see string. (Did you even use string? You're supposed too) Poor reactions. All right, moving on to my reasons for voting. I vote WWEUniverse. BenJ, yours was so fidgety that I had to view it multiple times to figure out what had happened. It looked like you didn't even use string, and the reactions were poor. The lighting changed about three times, which is extremely distracting. At the end, Jeff had a hand raised, you kind of forgot to move that down. WWE: The reasons I voted for you were that your animation was a bit better on lighting and you actually used string. I'm pretty sure all animations posted require string. It actually had a reaction, though it was really delayed, it was better than none. I think Ben J used string but you can't see it
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Oct 16, 2010 10:52:59 GMT -5
Benj: 1 SWA: 1 WWEUniverse: 0 Is what I got... (Cannot see animation from 2nd page. Will edit once I view the animations once more.)I'll try a new way of voting. I'll eliminate the worst out of the three and move on with my reasons for vote. SWA It seemed your motions were right, but it ended up very stiff. You moved the figures too much each frame, which made it seem choppy. The camera angle was all right and I don't see string. (Did you even use string? You're supposed too) Poor reactions. All right, moving on to my reasons for voting. I vote WWEUniverse. BenJ, yours was so fidgety that I had to view it multiple times to figure out what had happened. It looked like you didn't even use string, and the reactions were poor. The lighting changed about three times, which is extremely distracting. At the end, Jeff had a hand raised, you kind of forgot to move that down. WWE: The reasons I voted for you were that your animation was a bit better on lighting and you actually used string. I'm pretty sure all animations posted require string. It actually had a reaction, though it was really delayed, it was better than none. I think Ben J used string but you can't see it From what I can see, every frame Hardy had a foot on the ground.
|
|
|
Post by jakewrestling99 on Oct 16, 2010 15:25:10 GMT -5
My Vote go's to theswa99
Reason: I thought it had a good reaction. Saw string, but it was still good 9/10
|
|
M
Main Eventer
BWF.
Joined on: Jul 9, 2010 21:38:40 GMT -5
Posts: 4,334
|
Post by M on Oct 16, 2010 19:06:06 GMT -5
Score Update --BenJ--: 6 theswa99: 5 wweuniverse4787: 4
Looking close.
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Oct 16, 2010 20:16:08 GMT -5
Score Update--BenJ--: 6 theswa99: 5 wweuniverse4787: 4 Looking close. Er, are you counting every vote? These votes suck.
|
|
M
Main Eventer
BWF.
Joined on: Jul 9, 2010 21:38:40 GMT -5
Posts: 4,334
|
Post by M on Oct 16, 2010 21:46:24 GMT -5
Score Update--BenJ--: 6 theswa99: 5 wweuniverse4787: 4 Looking close. Er, are you counting every vote? These votes suck. I was just going on from where Walker left off, if i only counted the good votes everyone would be on 1 or something
|
|
|
Post by wweuniverse47871 on Oct 17, 2010 1:41:39 GMT -5
Er, are you counting every vote? These votes suck. I was just going on from where Walker left off, if i only counted the good votes everyone would be on 1 or something This match is heaps close hopefully more people vote and I get a few more
|
|
|
Post by 1000wwemaster on Oct 17, 2010 13:43:46 GMT -5
I vote for TheSWA99 because it had/showed good impact
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Oct 17, 2010 21:31:42 GMT -5
Er, are you counting every vote? These votes suck. I was just going on from where Walker left off, if i only counted the good votes everyone would be on 1 or something Then that's too bad. A good vote is a good vote. It deserves to be counted, bad ones do not.
|
|
|
Post by wweuniverse47871 on Oct 17, 2010 21:55:12 GMT -5
Whats the actual score? Edit: I just counted and what I got waswweuniverse4787 - 4benj - 5the swa - 6So it looks preety close
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 7:17:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2010 15:17:47 GMT -5
Whats the actual score? Edit: I just counted and what I got waswweuniverse4787 - 4benj - 5the swa - 6So it looks preety close Did you include the jobber's votes?
|
|
|
Post by wweuniverse47871 on Oct 18, 2010 15:35:40 GMT -5
Whats the actual score? Edit: I just counted and what I got waswweuniverse4787 - 4benj - 5the swa - 6So it looks preety close Did you include the jobber's votes? I can't remeber I didn't include that guy that got banned though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 7:17:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2010 15:40:08 GMT -5
Did you include the jobber's votes? I can't remeber I didn't include that guy that got banned though. Well it's however Andeh! counts it that makes it the winner.
|
|
|
Post by wweuniverse47871 on Oct 18, 2010 15:42:37 GMT -5
Yeh ok I'll stop counting
|
|
|
Post by johnmctossy on Oct 18, 2010 16:18:50 GMT -5
Yeh ok I'll stop counting I hope my vote counts because this match as been somewhat confusing ever since WWEUniverse4787 uploaded the youtube version of his ani
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Oct 18, 2010 17:19:12 GMT -5
Yeh ok I'll stop counting I hope my vote counts because this match as been somewhat confusing ever since WWEUniverse4787 uploaded the youtube version of his ani It doesn't, you said who you voted for and then just commented. You need some (legit) reasons. My count as of Time of post: WWEUniverse:1 SWA: 1 BenJ: 1
|
|