|
Post by man on Jul 1, 2009 15:19:26 GMT -5
The best thing about the current WWE Diva roster is the Mickie James Thickness! Period! End Thread! ;D
|
|
|
Post by joker123 on Jul 1, 2009 15:23:42 GMT -5
I'm sorry, since when do you know the reasons for anything WWE does? And whether the foot thing is anything to do with it, she would have had to stop wearing skirts anyway because of the PG. And no one is saying Mickie James is the regular diva size. But you're are saying she's fat, when she's not. And if Mickie is so out of shape, why haven't we read any reports of people telling her to get into shape? I read earlier that Rosa Mendes was recently told to get into better shape, and she's been doing it. Did you think she was fat too? And since when has anyone said Natalya she isn't champion because of her looks? I think you're forgetting Bertha Faye was a women's champion at one time. And Beth Phoenix isn't exactly Michelle McCool/Maryse like. Natalya isn't champion because she's busy focusing on The Hart Dynasty. And actually, I prefer Kelly Kelly over Mickie James. Beth Phoenix is a heel, all the "ugly" (ITO) divas are heels. Why isn't Beth Phoenix wearing short clothes like Mickie James does? Because they won't let her look hot. That's why. There was a recent shoot on WWE.com, I think it was that one from Extreme Rules and Nattie had her ring attire on while everyone else was in bikinis, are you saying thats just a coincidence? Nattie isn't champion as a face, because they know the audience won't like her for her looks. I don't think Mickie is fat cause of the reports, I've looked at her body and it's clear she doesn't work out. Atleast Nattie has a bit of muscle, for one. I don't think Rosa Mendes is fat either and an online report won't change that. If all the ugly divas are heels, then why would they need to be pretty to hold a women's title? You're not making sense. It's not like there's no heels that hold women's titles. And if Mickie James is so fat, then why isn't she a heel? And why are Maryse & Michelle McCool heel, shouldn't they be face? Also, just because she's not in Kelly Kelly shape doesn't mean she doesn't work out. She might not eat as well as the others, or eat a bit more than the others, or maybe she just has a slower metabolism.
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Jul 1, 2009 15:23:22 GMT -5
I'm sorry, since when do you know the reasons for anything WWE does? And whether the foot thing is anything to do with it, she would have had to stop wearing skirts anyway because of the PG. And no one is saying Mickie James is the regular diva size. But you're are saying she's fat, when she's not. And if Mickie is so out of shape, why haven't we read any reports of people telling her to get into shape? I read earlier that Rosa Mendes was recently told to get into better shape, and she's been doing it. Did you think she was fat too? And since when has anyone said Natalya she isn't champion because of her looks? I think you're forgetting Bertha Faye was a women's champion at one time. And Beth Phoenix isn't exactly Michelle McCool/Maryse like. Natalya isn't champion because she's busy focusing on The Hart Dynasty. And actually, I prefer Kelly Kelly over Mickie James. Beth Phoenix is a heel, all the "ugly" (ITO) divas are heels. Why isn't Beth Phoenix wearing short clothes like Mickie James does? Because they won't let her look hot. That's why. There was a recent shoot on WWE.com, I think it was that one from Extreme Rules and Nattie had her ring attire on while everyone else was in bikinis, are you saying thats just a coincidence? FYI, Katie Lea was also in her usual attires in that shoot aswell. And the shoot before that natalya was in a bra and mini skirt, so id say no coincidence.
|
|
|
Post by sxexhxc on Jul 1, 2009 15:27:19 GMT -5
Beth Phoenix is a heel, all the "ugly" (ITO) divas are heels. Why isn't Beth Phoenix wearing short clothes like Mickie James does? Because they won't let her look hot. That's why. There was a recent shoot on WWE.com, I think it was that one from Extreme Rules and Nattie had her ring attire on while everyone else was in bikinis, are you saying thats just a coincidence? Nattie isn't champion as a face, because they know the audience won't like her for her looks. I don't think Mickie is fat cause of the reports, I've looked at her body and it's clear she doesn't work out. Atleast Nattie has a bit of muscle, for one. I don't think Rosa Mendes is fat either and an online report won't change that. If all the ugly divas are heels, then why would they need to be pretty to hold a women's title? You're not making sense. It's not like there's no heels that hold women's titles. And if Mickie James is so fat, then why isn't she a heel? And why are Maryse & Michelle McCool heel, shouldn't they be face? Also, just because she's not in Kelly Kelly shape doesn't mean she doesn't work out. She might not eat as well as the others, or eat a bit more than the others, or maybe she just has a slower metabolism. To say Mickie James isn't fat, is ignorance and intellectually- disabled. She isn't in the shape a WWE Diva should be in. I don't understand why people keep telling me to go out and see a REAL chick, a real chick is Mickie's size but Mickie's size isn't a WWE Diva's size. End of story, debate, argument and thread.
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Jul 1, 2009 15:32:52 GMT -5
To say Mickie James isn't fat, is ignorance and intellectually- disabled. She isn't in the shape a WWE Diva should be in. I don't understand why people keep telling me to go out and see a REAL chick, a real chick is Mickie's size but Mickie's size isn't a WWE Diva's size. End of story, debate, argument and thread. Clearly she is or else she wouldn't have a job and she wouldn't be getting the pushes she's always getting.
|
|
|
Post by joker123 on Jul 1, 2009 15:32:48 GMT -5
If all the ugly divas are heels, then why would they need to be pretty to hold a women's title? You're not making sense. It's not like there's no heels that hold women's titles. And if Mickie James is so fat, then why isn't she a heel? And why are Maryse & Michelle McCool heel, shouldn't they be face? Also, just because she's not in Kelly Kelly shape doesn't mean she doesn't work out. She might not eat as well as the others, or eat a bit more than the others, or maybe she just has a slower metabolism. To say Mickie James isn't fat, is ignorance and intellectually- disabled. She isn't in the shape a WWE Diva should be in. I don't understand why people keep telling me to go out and see a REAL chick, a real chick is Mickie's size but Mickie's size isn't a WWE Diva's size. End of story, debate, argument and thread. Ok, you're not a mod, you don't decide when threads are over. I will however stop after this post. Mickie James ISN'T fat. The shape of a WWE Diva is very skinny, which she is not. But that doesn't make her fat. If she's not skinny, she's just average, that doesn't make her fat.
|
|
|
Post by man on Jul 1, 2009 15:37:18 GMT -5
To everyone here that's calling Mickie fat... this is from the heart...
Guys, on your best day you will never get with anyone even close to Mickie James hotness. That is a fact, my internet friends. And you can live with it!
|
|
|
Post by sxexhxc on Jul 1, 2009 15:45:53 GMT -5
To everyone here that's calling Mickie fat... this is from the heart... Guys, on your best day you will never get with anyone even close to Mickie James hotness. That is a fact, my internet friends. And you can live with it! Says who? I already have a girlfriend and I'd consider her better looking than Mickie James, who looks like a fat horse. And to Cam, I can't decide when threads are over, but I can decide when I am going to go out of them and with that, I'm out of here.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jul 1, 2009 15:54:33 GMT -5
To everyone here that's calling Mickie fat... this is from the heart... Guys, on your best day you will never get with anyone even close to Mickie James hotness. That is a fact, my internet friends. And you can live with it! Says who? I already have a girlfriend and I'd consider her better looking than Mickie James, who looks like a fat horse. And to Cam, I can't decide when threads are over, but I can decide when I am going to go out of them and with that, I'm out of here. Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out.
|
|
|
Post by man on Jul 1, 2009 15:55:51 GMT -5
Sure you do, sport... Her name is Zelda and you rescue her every night wearing a little green hat.
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Jul 1, 2009 16:10:00 GMT -5
Whats even funnier, is people like A.G. who can tell someone what their life consists of. Seriously dude, back off. Why would it matter if he does or doesn't have a girlfriend? I don't, but i'm fairly sure i've had more than quite few people in here ( not everyone ). But again, why would that even matter?
Are the girls i've had in better shape than Mickie, absolutely not. But they also aren't professional wrestling / celebrities. Like it or not, the WWE Divas are expected to be in shape. Working out is a part of being a professional wrestler.
Again, not saying she's fat or or looks terrible. But she has put on weight, much like Candice did. See what happened to Candice? Mickie will lose that weight, just watch.
- Triple S
|
|
|
Post by man on Jul 1, 2009 16:18:18 GMT -5
I laugh at anyone that puts down somebody who's very job is to look attractive on TV. And my point is that the goofs on this board that put Mickie down will NEVER get anyone even close to her sex appeal. Period.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jul 1, 2009 16:22:14 GMT -5
I laugh at anyone that puts down somebody who's very job is to look attractive on TV. And my point is that the goofs on this board that put Mickie down will NEVER get anyone even close to her sex appeal. Period. ...and typically, the people who claim they have or had someone hotter, conveniently can't back anything up with proof. As far as 'being in shape' being a necessity, this guy needs to go tell that to all of the guys who have a couple of extra pounds to lose too. Mickie looks absolutely fine.
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Jul 1, 2009 16:26:04 GMT -5
Whats even funnier, is people like A.G. who can tell someone what their life consists of. Seriously dude, back off. Why would it matter if he does or doesn't have a girlfriend? I don't, but i'm fairly sure i've had more than quite few people in here ( not everyone ). But again, why would that even matter? Are the girls i've had in better shape than Mickie, absolutely not. But they also aren't professional wrestling / celebrities. Like it or not, the WWE Divas are expected to be in shape. Working out is a part of being a professional wrestler. Again, not saying she's fat or or looks terrible. But she has put on weight, much like Candice did. See what happened to Candice? Mickie will lose that weight, just watch. - Triple S Too bad Candice's handles were billowing out of her tights in those pics; Mickie's aren't because she barely has any (love handles, not tights). And just because a girl is thick, doesn't mean she's fat. Sara Del Rey is a perfect example. She doesn't have freaky huge thighs because she's fat, she has freaky huge thighs because she can squat something like 300+ pounds.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Jul 1, 2009 16:26:39 GMT -5
Got a little muffin top. That's all.
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Jul 1, 2009 16:42:37 GMT -5
I'm sorry, since when do you know the reasons for anything WWE does? And whether the foot thing is anything to do with it, she would have had to stop wearing skirts anyway because of the PG. And no one is saying Mickie James is the regular diva size. But you're are saying she's fat, when she's not. And if Mickie is so out of shape, why haven't we read any reports of people telling her to get into shape? I read earlier that Rosa Mendes was recently told to get into better shape, and she's been doing it. Did you think she was fat too? And since when has anyone said Natalya she isn't champion because of her looks? I think you're forgetting Bertha Faye was a women's champion at one time. And Beth Phoenix isn't exactly Michelle McCool/Maryse like. Natalya isn't champion because she's busy focusing on The Hart Dynasty. And actually, I prefer Kelly Kelly over Mickie James. Beth Phoenix is a heel, all the "ugly" (ITO) divas are heels. Why isn't Beth Phoenix wearing short clothes like Mickie James does? Because they won't let her look hot. That's why. There was a recent shoot on WWE.com, I think it was that one from Extreme Rules and Nattie had her ring attire on while everyone else was in bikinis, are you saying thats just a coincidence? Nattie isn't champion as a face, because they know the audience won't like her for her looks. I don't think Mickie is fat cause of the reports, I've looked at her body and it's clear she doesn't work out. Atleast Nattie has a bit of muscle, for one. I don't think Rosa Mendes is fat either and an online report won't change that. best HEEL diva in the WWE and shes far from "ugly" and they don't make her cover up either. so your logic once again is a flawed one.
|
|
|
Post by Wrestlaholic on Jul 1, 2009 16:46:27 GMT -5
She's damn perfect.
|
|
|
Post by S on Jul 1, 2009 17:23:47 GMT -5
If all the ugly divas are heels, then why would they need to be pretty to hold a women's title? You're not making sense. It's not like there's no heels that hold women's titles. And if Mickie James is so fat, then why isn't she a heel? And why are Maryse & Michelle McCool heel, shouldn't they be face? Also, just because she's not in Kelly Kelly shape doesn't mean she doesn't work out. She might not eat as well as the others, or eat a bit more than the others, or maybe she just has a slower metabolism. To say Mickie James isn't fat, is ignorance and intellectually- disabled. She isn't in the shape a WWE Diva should be in. I don't understand why people keep telling me to go out and see a REAL chick, a real chick is Mickie's size but Mickie's size isn't a WWE Diva's size. End of story, debate, argument and thread. My GOD! since when does a certian person need to conform to a certian shape... without variation, things would be pointless. Beth Phoenix isn't the 'cookie cutter' shape', yet she is one of the most successful divas they have. If you want a past example, look at Chyna, she won the IC title and wasn't the right shape to be a WWE diva. You have your opinion and thats fine, but dont think for a second that we are gonna stop giving our opinions because you say its the end of it
|
|
sevb30
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 14, 2008 12:55:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,378
|
Post by sevb30 on Jul 1, 2009 17:32:14 GMT -5
I'm glad almost 90 percent of us have some sense in here on this issue. Beauty comes in more than one size, it's fun to enjoy the sexiness of the divas being differing sizes.
|
|
|
Post by Kenny Powers on Jul 1, 2009 17:33:00 GMT -5
That outfit didn't do her any favors.
|
|